<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Watch?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2005/11/21/why-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2005/11/21/why-watch/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dvd</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2005/11/21/why-watch/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>dvd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spoutblog.com/2005/11/21/why-watch/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Although I know all too well what it's like to have too little time on one's hands, I generally disagree with the practice of turning off a film. If one were to go into every film blindly, with no expectations, then it would be a different matter. But don't we seek out films by Bergman, Bunuel, Kubrick and Cassavetes because we've heard these great things about them? Hasn't their worth been validated to a certain extent by third parties? When I'm watching a film and it doesn't grab me in the first twenty or thirty minutes (which is all the time, because I have trouble watching films on small screens), I'll generally give it the benefit of the doubt. I know that it means something to someone - or, most likely, a great many people - and I want to understand what that meaning is. Curiosity conquers boredom - curiosity inverts boredom.

And even if I'm not ready to accept an idea or the film that presents it, I need to see the whole film to understand that idea, and how I might relate to it. I've seen too many pictures that change drastically and alter the audience's perception of them mid-course to think otherwise.

But of course, I'm a bit of a hypocrite - if someone turned off Aliens Vs. Predator halfway through, I wouldn't blink an eye.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I know all too well what it&#8217;s like to have too little time on one&#8217;s hands, I generally disagree with the practice of turning off a film. If one were to go into every film blindly, with no expectations, then it would be a different matter. But don&#8217;t we seek out films by Bergman, Bunuel, Kubrick and Cassavetes because we&#8217;ve heard these great things about them? Hasn&#8217;t their worth been validated to a certain extent by third parties? When I&#8217;m watching a film and it doesn&#8217;t grab me in the first twenty or thirty minutes (which is all the time, because I have trouble watching films on small screens), I&#8217;ll generally give it the benefit of the doubt. I know that it means something to someone - or, most likely, a great many people - and I want to understand what that meaning is. Curiosity conquers boredom - curiosity inverts boredom.</p>
<p>And even if I&#8217;m not ready to accept an idea or the film that presents it, I need to see the whole film to understand that idea, and how I might relate to it. I&#8217;ve seen too many pictures that change drastically and alter the audience&#8217;s perception of them mid-course to think otherwise.</p>
<p>But of course, I&#8217;m a bit of a hypocrite - if someone turned off Aliens Vs. Predator halfway through, I wouldn&#8217;t blink an eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
