Films We’re Looking Forward to in 2009
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

Portland postcard 1: city of theaters

By posted 2 years ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Greetings from Portland, the city that apparently has more movie theater seats per capita than any other city in the country. My man Jason and I are out here visiting my brother, Bill, who is a huge film lover–6-foot-4, to be exact (so sorry for the bad pun). For people who are into great community film-watching experiences, this seems to be the place to live. Not only are there theaters all over the city keeping up with the first-run pace of much larger cities like New York and LA, there are several alternative theater experiences to take advantage of. Personally, I’m much more excited about these than I am about catching a new film now that will hit my local art theater back home two or three months later. I can wait. What I can’t do back home is drink a good microbrew while I’m enjoying an affordable, well-chosen film in a community setting (ie: not my livingroom).

Take the Laurelhurst Theater. This movie theater landmark since 1923 shows second runs and classics on four screens for $3 a show, while you fill up on pizza and wash it down with microbrews. The McMenamin brothers have also made a huge name for themselves in Portland, by refurbishing historic buildings, showing $3 films, and serving exceptionally delicious pub grub and their own micro-brewed beers. They have four theater locations, including one in an old elementary school. And get this: The Academy Theater not only has “real” food, beer and wine, it also offers inexpensive babysitting on site! A complete date at an affordable price–what a novel concept!

So all of us not from Portland (or Austin or the few other places in the country that have their theater groove on) are thinking “Of course! That’s the way to see films! That’s the way to keep historic theaters as theaters, and to repurpose other great old buildings into film destinations rather than driving film-lovers all out to the suburbs!” If we’re all thinking that, where are the McMenamins of Indianapolis and Pittsburgh and Louisville? When will every other place jump on the train? Are the rest of us really not cool enough to support these kinds of theaters in small and mid-sized cities across the map?

Finding the movie of me

Paul Moore
By Paul Moore posted 2 years ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Since SXSW 2005 I’ve been hearing about the Duplass brothers and this film I’ve got to see, The Puffy Chair. What I hadn’t heard until recently was the story of the Duplass brothers and their near abandonment of filmmaking.

In an interview with Erik Davis at Cinematical, Jay Duplass, director of The Puffy Chair, tells the story of the night he and his brother made a short film that became the darling of the Sundance Film Festival.

“Well, we had been making really bad movies all through our 20s and we were just depressed, sitting in our apartment, thinking we’re gonna have to quit because it was draining money and, well, we felt it just wasn’t going to happen. We’re obviously not cut out to make movies. And Mark, who is sort of like the bully and pusher in our relationship, gets up and is like, “Screw it, we’re making a movie today. We’re not leaving this apartment until we make a movie.” All we had was our parents home video camera and, uh, I came up with this idea of a guy who tries to put back the personal greeting on his answering machine. So Mark said, “That’s it!” He walked out the door–we didn’t write a script, we didn’t do anything–he came back in and tried to perform this scene. He ended up crying and falling to the ground–it was all out of our own fears of desperation and being failures–and it all happened in one take. It was the first time I was on set and felt I was capturing something unique and beautiful.”

I imagine these “bad movies” the Duplasses were making. They can be found everywhere (I’ve got a few of my own attempts sitting in a box somewhere) and the scenario around making them reminds me of the making of a high school play. The theater teacher decides to do To Kill a Mockingbird because the kids will be able to picture themselves acting out great performances like Gregory Peck and Robert Duvall. Over the months, they rehearse, bond, get artsy and have a great time. Then opening night comes and all the parents proudly watch their kids’ work. But the parents have seen Gregory Peck and Robert Duvall in the film version and the high school performance is a mimicry of a classic. The parents, luckily, are mostly entertained anyway because these are their kids and the kids are learning.

The Duplasses (along with the rest of us) are learning. We’ve all made films with wedged-in dialogue explaining unnecessary plot points, and actors trying to muster up interest in what they’re saying, offering long, contemplative looks to convey depth. They were just little films that seemed so glorious until the outside world watched them. What I love about the Duplass brothers is that, in a moment of desperation, they stopped mimicking their favorite films and found the film about themselves–the film only they could make. Maybe I’ll get there myself someday.

Can gems shine through YouTube?

By Dave DeBoer posted 2 years ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

With YouTube blowing up more and more all the time, (surpassing MySpace in popularity with more than 100 million videos watched every day), it seems like filmmakers are struggling to find a home in this cluttered and dense community.

As Paul pointed out in his last post, there is an advantage to getting on the YouTube train. But it’s not all good. It seems to me the greatest advantage of the service–that anyone can post a video–is also the greatest disadvantage. If you are a filmmaker trying to get your work noticed, how is it possible to let your stuff shine through such a dense forest?

Even though some local filmmakers here in GR are finding it an effective channel, for me, YouTube is still not the best place to find a gem of a short film. But who knows what the future will hold. What do you think?

Somebody’s listening

Paul Moore
By Paul Moore posted 2 years ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

YouTube apparently does more than provide some laughs for free. It’s starting to help big entertainment executives connect to what real people want.

It looks like a new TV show, Nobody’s Watching