I *really* didn’t want to do back-to-back Lindsay Lohan posts, but I just can’t pass up an opportunity to talk about A Star is Born. Blame Jeff Wells.
Okay: back in June, I wrote a column for the Huffington Post, in which I placed Ms. Lohan’s downward spiral in a trajectory of wrecked childstars that possibly began with Judy Garland. I wrote:
Lindsay and Judy have an awful lot in common. Both were child stars, raised by stage mothers far more interested in their daughter’s fame than in their actual well-being. Judy’s life-long drug addiction began when her mother (in cahoots with Louis B. Meyer) put her on uppers to lose weight; if Lindsay’s mom isn’t actually doing drugs with her daughter, she’s at the very least accompanying Lindsay to clubs and turning a blind eye on her daughter’s substance abuse…[W]hen that letter from the producer of Georgia Rule leaked, all I could think of was Garland’s famous suspension at MGM in the late 40s, which inevitably led to the end of her career in movies. The drugs that kept [Judy] slim and energetic in musicals as a teen and 20-something had taken their toll by her 30s, and through a combination of her declining looks and her inability to show up on time, she became virtually unemployable. She lived out the last decade of her life broke, semi-homeless, and all but forgotten by the producers who made millions off of her as a teenager.
Four years after Judy Garland was dropped from her MGM contract, she famously tried to make a comeback by producing and starring in a musical remake of A Star is Born. In that film, Garland played an up-and-coming singer/actress whose rise to the top of the Hollywood ladder parallels her alcoholic actor husband’s fall. At the end of the film (spoiler alert!), the husband, whose stage name is Norman Maine, gets arrested for drunk driving and, in an attempt to spare his wife further embarrassment and bother, walks into the ocean. Seen today, with Garland’s drug-fueled demise far in the rearview, A Star is Born plays like a failed attempt on the part of the former childstar to publicly exorcise her crippling demons. Needless to say, that didn’t work; Star also didn’t do much to revitalize her film career.
As news of Lohan’s latest arrest spread across the web this afternoon, various self-appointed experts have rushed to diagnose the damage done by this incident to Lohan’s career. E! Online speculates that Lohan will almost surely lose a role currently on her slate, and Perez Hilton says (caps, of course, his), “NO ONE is going to want to work with her now. And IF they do hire her, Lohan will most likely be forced to pay for her own insurance on films, which will be VERY COSTLY.” Jeffrey Wells puts it like this (again, emphasis his):
She can’t be an “actress” any more because there’s no accepting her as anyone other than herself — the dumbest and most arrogant meltdown case in Hollywood history…It goes without saying that she’s become the industry’s youngest-ever Norman Maine. If this was a movie, the classy sad solution would be to walk into the Pacific…and stay there.
This, just a week after Jeremy Blake, in response to the suicide of girlfriend Theresa Duncan, allegedly did the same thing with a different ocean. Nobody seemed to think Blake’s walk into the Atlantic was “classy”–in fact, a friend of Blake and Duncan told the New York Post that he thought it was “cliche” and “calculated.” But I guess Blake wasn’t famous/famously messed up enough for his walk into the sea to qualify as a career “solution.”
In other news, Lindsay has a movie coming out this weekend!
You should get your facts on Garland straight. Long after her dismissal from MGM, she became one of the highest paid performers of her time. Garnered Oscar nom’s for not only A Star is Born, but also Judgement at Nuremburg; starred in several tv specials and her own weekly show — received Emmy nom’s; a Tony,Grammys. Her Paladium, Palace & Carnegie Hall concerts are literally the stuff of legends. She continued to perform to sell out crowds until the year before she died. And all of this despite her addiction. Try actually looking at some photos of her through 68–a stunning woman, the epitome of class, total talent. So, you see, the 60’s was hardly the horrific last decade you painted in your comments. Thanks.
“she became one of the highest paid performers of her time.”
…and at that point, she owed so much in back taxes that she had to funnel the money directly to the IRS.
“starred in several tv specials and her own weekly show”
Her CBS show was canceled due to poor ratings, even after CBS attempted to revamp it to dilute Judy’s personality.
“try actually looking at some photos of her through 68–a stunning woman,”
I agree — stunningly ravaged by life-long eating disorders and addiction.
I love her too, but it wasn’t rosy, happy times.
My comments were addressing the misinformation in the original post which stated “famous suspension at MGM in the late 40s, which inevitably led to the end of her career in movies. The drugs that kept [Judy] slim and energetic in musicals as a teen and 20-something had taken their toll by her 30s, and through a combination of her declining looks and her inability to show up on time, she became virtually unemployable. She lived out the last decade of her life broke, semi-homeless, and all but forgotten by the producers who made millions off of her as a teenager” Simply wrong-as I’ve already outlined, some of her greatest accomplishments were after her MGM career ended; her tv specials were hugely successful and are what led to CBS wanting her for the series–yes, the series was canceled after 1 year. The analysis for that could go on for pages, but the historical perspective based on the reviews of the series dvd’s, is that it was an excellent production. Regardless of her mismanagement of her income and IRS problems, she was very much employed throughout her last decade, contrary to your statement. As far as beauty, well, I guess that is in the eye of the beholder. A Johnny Mercer biographer stated she was as her most alluring during the series (her early 40’s) and I feel her appearances on Hollywood Palace, What’s My Line, Merv Griffin, into 1968 further attest to that. But again, beauty is so subjective. In conclusion, it seems to me misleading to completely omit all of the accomplishments to focus only on the negative–why show only 1/2 of the picture? Thanks again.
[...] From blog.spout.com [...]
Speaking of the amazingly talented and uniquely beautuful Judy Garland, there is an exciting and popular new group on Yahoo called The Judy Garland Experience. The group is huge, and has the most diverse collection of Garland fans anywhere! The membership includes Garland family members, other celebrities, authors, film makers, fans of all ages, and more. The only one missing is you!
There is always a lively discussion going on, and the groups photo and audio files are simply amazing. This week they are having an audio retrospective of Judy’s many concerts at the Palace 1951-1967, with interviews, promos, backstage shennanigans caught on tape, tracks from several of her concerts there, and Miss Joan Crawford (who joined Judy on stage one hot August night in 1967). Please stop by our little Judyville and check it out. You may never want to leave!
http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/thejudygarlandexperience/?yguid=291582832
Ok first of all To compare Lindsay Lohan to Judy Garland, would be like comparing Patrick Ewing to Michael Jordan. Not even in the same league. Judy Garland was dishing out two movies a year as opposed to Lindsay Lohan’s what? Five mainstream films? I agree with these other people who have commented on this forum. You really need to get your facts straight. Judy was on uppers to maintain her weight but being so busy and stressed out with all the work she was doing, her company insisted she take downers to help her sleep better. Thats where her addiction really came from. She was taking pain
killers and muscle relaxers until the
addiction took over her life. Thus ending in her dieing in the hallway of a London hotel. As for Lyndsay Lohan shes became an alcoholic and cokehead for no legitimate reason at all. Judy
Garland had gone through five failed marriages before her breakdown. Read her bio you’ll find she didnt have it
easy at all. But as for Lyndsay Lohan. She’s a joke with no acting ability whatsoever. If the drugs hadn’t taken her over then the crappy ratings would have. Do your homework. Later
hi
I think it’s dumb to compare Lindsay Lohan to Judy Garland. Judy made much more of an impact than Lindsay ever will. Comparing Lindsay to Judy is like comparing a happy meal to fillet minion . Lindsay is a joke.