Recently, IFC’s Evan Shapiro defended his company’s production and distribution of new chapters in R. Kelly’s Trapped in the Closet saga by comparing the “hip hopera” pioneer to postmodern trash god John Waters. Trapped, according to Shapiro, “challenges the traditional mores and sexual stereotypes of the current climate as boldly — and hysterically — as many films coming out of Hollywood or the indie movement.”
In the current climate of posture-as-polemic, it’s impossible to gauge exactly how seriously Shapiro intended us to take that provocation, but I certainly kept it in mind whilst watching Chapter 13 of Trapped (the first Chapter to be produced under the IFC deal), which premiered on IFCTV.com last night. New episodes are set to premiere every evening on the site for the next ten days.
From the first shot, it’s immediately apparent that Trapped’s production values have been elevated somewhat since Chapter 12 was released two years ago. The story has moved out of the closets and cupboards and kitchens of Slyvester and crew, and on to the streets of Chicago (or, at least, a decent facsimile thereof). There are sophisticated camera movements, and lush, dissolve-heavy montages. Whereas the soundtracks of previous episodes barely allowed Kelly the time to take a breath, Chapter 13 concludes with a musical interlude that’s actually about the passing of time.
Although Kelly still reads and/or sings each actor’s lines for them, he seems to be trying to create distinct vocal characters for some of the players in the story. In the previous twelve chapters, the only character that Kelly seemed to make an effort to differentiate was Bridget, the overweight white woman who has an affair with (wait for it) the midget. In Chapter 13, his new attitude towards acting is most noticeable in a scene in which the nosey neighbor glimpsed briefly in Chapter 7 fights with her husband. This is, I guess, a natural progression, as the shorts move from being primarily R. Kelly songs to being primarily mini-movies, but if it continues, it could have profound implications on Trapped’s signature, quasi-Brechtian manner of storytelling.
Elsewhere it seems as though Trapped’s unique logic has been smoothed down into something more traditionally cinematic. I particularly miss what I like to call The Two Kellys Effect, which was used in Chepater 11 and to greater effect in Chapter 12. At the end of Chapter 11, when Sylvester (played on screen by Kelly), James, Twan, Bridget and the midget are all in the kitchen pointing guns at one another, a second Kelly walks out of (where else?) the kitchen closet and delivers the chapter’s final bit of narration directly to the camera. Chapter 12 consisted of two parts: an argument between Cathy (the woman Sylvester wakes up next to in Chapter 1), her husband Rufus, and Rufus’ lover Chuck; and a phone call between Cathy and her friend Gwendolyn (who is also Sylvester’s wife). This part of the story itself didn’t demand Kelly’s presence as Sylvester on screen, but during the argument section, he appears a cigar-smoking apparition, fading in and out of the scene, visible to us but not to Cathy, Chuck and Rufus.
The Two Kellys Effect was, to my mind, Trapped in the Closet’s best chance at transcending camp value and approaching some kind of legitimate self-awareness as epic theater. The removal of that device is something of a double-edged sword. It certainly makes it easier to immerse oneself in the story, thus making Trapped feel more like a traditional drama, but I thought the appeal of Trapped was that it wasn’t a traditional drama — and that even when it begins to approach typical soap territory, it immediately takes a turn for the baroquely bizarre that’s virtually unparalleled elsewhere in contemporary culture.
Maybe Kelly’s artistic vision has changed; maybe the influx of IFC cash has given him the chance to fully realize his vision for the first time. Anything’s possible, I suppose. I just hope that Shapiro and Kelly and friends understand one thing: Trapped in the Closet isn’t really Trapped in the Closet without multiple alienation effects.
[...] Read the rest here. Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]
First of all, thank you for such an insightful review of “Trapped” Chapter 13. Regardless of how one feels about the entire project, or the individual episodes, “Trapped” evokes strong opinions, such as yours.
I can assure you, that I do take seriously my point of view (which you call a “provocation”), that with “Trapped”, Kelly follows in the footsteps of John Waters.
“Trapped”, like many of Waters’ films have, exists on the fringe of mainstream culture, but also on the forefront of the current (or next) cultural shift.
Yes, there are many traditional elements to his storytelling that allow us to define it as a ”soap”. But those elements are also universal to many great stories - no matter the era.
I believe that, in his latest ten chapters, Kelly uses pop music composition, musical theater techniques, independent film sensibilities, controversial (even outlandish) cultural iconography and of-the-moment currency, to weave a truly modern epic, with Barnum-esque scale.
New York Magazine’s website compared “Trapped” a modern Dickens novel - albeit with a bit of irony, I imagine - the way we are releasing it day by day, and how Kelly’s audience hangs on every chapter.
Regardless of how you feel, you have to admit, somehow, “Trapped” has become a minor cultural phenomenon. But, it’s more than that.
“Trapped” gives us a glimpse into the future of storytelling - good old fashion drama, married to current cultural movements, distributed at once to an on-demand community of fans and detractors, who make the conversation ABOUT the work, its own self-generating content.
As to your creative constructive criticism on Chapter 13… I think, if you remain tuned in to all the new chapters, you will NOT be disappointed. Kelly takes his characters, and his writing, to a whole new, crazy level of brilliance, outrage and alienation.
evan shapiro
general manager
ifc tv
[...] Shapiro, general manager of IFC, wrote a long comment on my review of Chapter 13 of Trapped in the Closet. I’ve pasted it below; my response is after the jump. [...]
Comparing Kelly to Hollywood Squares washup John Waters is ludicrous. Can we please be finished with the white people wondering whether or not R Kelly knows what he’s doing? OF COURSE HE KNOWS, HE CREATED IT and all these RACIST HIPSTERS can do is pat themselves on the back for getting the joke, sorta.
[...] all this Trapped in the Closet hullabaloo in the air (yes, I just typed “hullabaloo”, and no, Firefox’s automatic spell [...]
[...] Assessing the first IFC-produced chapter of Trapped in the Closet, I wrote that “From the first shot, it’s immediately apparent that Trapped’s production values have been elevated somewhat since Chapter 12 was released two years ago” and expresed concern that this and other noticeable changes “could have profound implications on Trapped’s signature, quasi-Brechtian manner of storytelling.” Then IFC TV’s general manager was like, “No you didn’t.” [...]
i think that r. kelly’s trapped in the closet series is fantastic and i can’t wait until he finally releases the rest of trapped in the closet series. keep up the great work always god bless
ALL I WANNA KNO IS WEN IS CHAPTERS 23-32 COMING OUT I BEEN WAITING FOR THEM TO COME I KNO THEY SAID IN THE SUMMER OF 2009 BUT I NEED TO KNOW THE EXACT DATE CAUSE I REALLY REALLY CANT WAIT TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS NEXT BUT I KNO ONE THING FOR SURE THE PACKAGE IS DEFENITLY NOT AIDS BECAUSE ALL OF THEM WOULDNT HAVE IT I MEAN WHEN SYLVESTER SLEPT WITH CATHY SHE DIDNT SLEEP WITH RUFUS.SYLVESTER WENT HOME & SLEPT WITH GWEN BUT THAT WAS AFTER SHE SLEPT WITH JAMES SO GWENDOLY JAMES BRIDGET & THE MIDGET DNT HAVE IT NOBODY DOES REALLY CUZ IT WOULDNT MAKE ANY SENSE I THINK CATHY GOT SOME PEOPLE TO BEAT UP CHUCK THAT’S ALL BUT I GUESS I JUS HAVE 2 WAIT & SEE IF IM RIGHT OR WRONG I CANT WAIT ‘TIL THEY COME OUT IM DEFINATLY GONE BE WATCHING