Advertisement



Cronenberg calls Haggis a [bleep]hole



Today in filmmaker catfights: the director of the first CRASH throws a bone to the Haggis-haters.

The hands-down quote of the day comes from David Cronenberg. The filmmaker was recently asked how he felt about Paul Haggis naming his “race relations are hard” Oscar winner Crash less than a decade after Cronenberg released his own film, about car crash fetishists, with the same title. According to IMDB, there were at least five films called Crash before Cronenbeg’s, but his, based on a J.G. Ballard book of the same name, was certainly the most well-known. And according to the New York Post, Cronenberg thinks Haggis plagiarized on purpose:

I’ve told [him] that he was a [bleep]hole basically for doing that. And so have many other people. It’s very disrespectful, not only to me, but to J.G. Ballard, who wrote the book . . . I made my movie . . . in a very respectful way. Haggis just co- opted the title, and he knew what he was doing.

Did he, though? Could Haggis have really thought that the titular confusion would *help* his movie? I guess there could have been a cunning plot afoot, but I don’t want to give Haggis too much credit.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • bodytext


Related Posts:

3 Comments

  1. Posted October 31, 2007 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    All that matters Karina, is that Haggis was called an asshole. I’d have preferred “pretentious, overrated, asshole,” but don’t want to sound ungrateful.

    Haven’t seen Cronenberg’s “Crash,” but no doubt its better than Haggis’s. “Clambake” is better than Haggis’s.

    Want to know how much I hated Haggis’s “Crash?” I liked “Elah” better. Both are sharp sticks under the fingernails, “Elah” just the lesser.

  2. Scott
    Posted October 31, 2007 at 5:25 pm | Permalink

    I think the point of disrespect is valid. Clearly Haggis set out to eclipse the previous association. He couldn’t possibly play ignorant to the confusion. It left the two films to tussle: “Did you see Crash?” “I’ve always meant to.” or “I love that film” or “Gosh no. Sex and cars?” It could only give Haggis’ film an air of controversy from any resulting confusion.

    Handy.

  3. taylor
    Posted February 11, 2008 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    RE: Dirty Harry

    Just curious, why did you go to see “Elah” if you hated Haggis’s “Crash”?

    Seems a bit masochistic to me.

2 Trackbacks

  1. By Cronenberg: "Paul Haggis es un "#&&!@" on October 31, 2007 at 1:26 pm

    [...] Vía | Spout Blog [...]

  2. [...] Vía | Spout Blog [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*