Comments on: Margot at the Wedding http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/14/margot-at-the-wedding/ Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:19:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: leevee http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/14/margot-at-the-wedding/#comment-45590 leevee Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:54:49 +0000 http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/14/margot-at-the-wedding/#comment-45590 Saw Margot last night and thought I'd look up some reviews to figure out why it got written in the first place, much less made into a movie. The acting was always ACTING, except for Jack Black who was being Jack Black. What was the point, anyway? For some reason the experience reminded me of Naomi Wolf being interviewed. Words, emotionally delivered, self-involved, sounds thoughtful...when read word for word, says nothing. Saw Margot last night and thought I’d look up some reviews to figure out why it got written in the first place, much less made into a movie. The acting was always ACTING, except for Jack Black who was being Jack Black. What was the point, anyway?

For some reason the experience reminded me of Naomi Wolf being interviewed. Words, emotionally delivered, self-involved, sounds thoughtful…when read word for word, says nothing.

]]> By: Brad Wilke http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/14/margot-at-the-wedding/#comment-22676 Brad Wilke Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:13:52 +0000 http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/14/margot-at-the-wedding/#comment-22676 Nice of you to re-address my comment, but since "Margot" has yet to open in Seattle and I was out of town for "Hannah"'s run at the NWFF, I am not able to respond in kind. Perhaps next time... Nice of you to re-address my comment, but since “Margot” has yet to open in Seattle and I was out of town for “Hannah”’s run at the NWFF, I am not able to respond in kind. Perhaps next time…

]]>