Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world
RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

Joe Swanberg and Spout

Paul Moore
By Paul Moore posted 11 months ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon

Spout loves JoeIt’s no secret Karina and I have been advocates of Joe Swanberg’s films since his debut, Kissing on the Mouth, hit festivals two years ago. In light of the recent debate about conflict of interest in the film blog community, I think it’s a good time to clarify our relationship as critics/fans versus the sponsorship/distributor ventures we’ve been getting into, most recently with Butterknife.

For Spout, some may say it’s a conflict of interest for a company employing ardent supporters writing about Swanberg to then distribute his work online, as if our support has been engineered for two years to help Butterknife. So, before the record is even bent, I’ll set it straight.

We have felt since seeing Kissing on the Mouth that Joe is a filmmaker to watch. Trying to spread the word about his movies is what we do. There was no talk of distributing his work until recently. That said, after Spout’s promotion of Four Eyed Monsters in June, Joe contacted me and said he had an idea for a web series he would be shopping around later in the year. In September, he shot the first four episodes of Butterknife and showed me a rough cut. It was unanimous here, everybody wanted to show it and we bought the Internet distribution rights.

So, we officially switch hats here. We will be promoting Butterknife on SpoutBlog in the coming months. I think we’d be covering it anyway as we have all of Joe’s work, but it is true we now have more than an altruistic reason to promote it.

And now… a shameless promotion: Sign up to get notified when Butterknife is released at butterknife.spout.com.

Add your comments

  • Noralil Ryan Fores said

    While I’m glad you posted this explanation, I by and large think it should be unneccessary. Worse perhaps than promoting indie filmmakers who actually have some artistic merit, is falling the way of journalistic laziness. No one in this film journalism business is objective. It’s just different degrees of tempered subjectivity.

    I think this is a great idea, and although I have my hesitation’s about Swanberg’s work from time to time, I think the fact you’ve given him an outlet is well done.

    Good job, dudes.

  • Paul said

    Thanks Noralil,
    I also feel the explanation should be unnecessary because my favorite film distributors are also avid film lovers. It only makes sense for fans/critics to–when given the opportunity–help in distributing work they really believe in.