<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe Swanberg and Spout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/15/joe-swanberg-and-spout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/15/joe-swanberg-and-spout/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Moore</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/15/joe-swanberg-and-spout/#comment-22505</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/15/joe-swanberg-and-spout/#comment-22505</guid>
		<description>Thanks Noralil,
I also feel the explanation should be unnecessary because my favorite film distributors are also avid film lovers. It only makes sense for fans/critics to--when given the opportunity--help in distributing work they really believe in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Noralil,<br />
I also feel the explanation should be unnecessary because my favorite film distributors are also avid film lovers. It only makes sense for fans/critics to&#8211;when given the opportunity&#8211;help in distributing work they really believe in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noralil Ryan Fores</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/15/joe-swanberg-and-spout/#comment-21883</link>
		<dc:creator>Noralil Ryan Fores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/15/joe-swanberg-and-spout/#comment-21883</guid>
		<description>While I'm glad you posted this explanation, I by and large think it should be unneccessary. Worse perhaps than promoting indie filmmakers who actually have some artistic merit, is falling the way of journalistic laziness. No one in this film journalism business is objective. It's just different degrees of tempered subjectivity. 

I think this is a great idea, and although I have my hesitation's about Swanberg's work from time to time, I think the fact you've given him an outlet is well done. 

Good job, dudes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m glad you posted this explanation, I by and large think it should be unneccessary. Worse perhaps than promoting indie filmmakers who actually have some artistic merit, is falling the way of journalistic laziness. No one in this film journalism business is objective. It&#8217;s just different degrees of tempered subjectivity. </p>
<p>I think this is a great idea, and although I have my hesitation&#8217;s about Swanberg&#8217;s work from time to time, I think the fact you&#8217;ve given him an outlet is well done. </p>
<p>Good job, dudes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
