SXSW
Advertisement



Jesse James Under Consideration?



We thought WB was dumping it when they skimped on TV ads and kept it away from regional critics. But were they saving their wad for the Academy all along?

 jessejamesad.png

Go to Variety.com this morning, and chances are you’ll be greeted by a full-page For Your Consideration ad on behalf of The Assassination of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford. Which is interesting, considering that when the film premiered in September, Warner Brothers all but declined to promote it, spending the bare minimum on advertising and making it virtually impossible for non-coastal critics to write reviews. Whether it’s a last-ditch salvage job or it was part of the plan all along, maybe Warner Brothers understands that this is a film with limited mainstream appeal that nonetheless deserves a chance to play in the awards game?
Maybe, maybe not. For me, the overall takeaway from the ad (I took a screencap and pasted it above, just to make sure it wasn’t an early morning hallucination) is that the studio is still working against the movie’s strengths. Looking what they’re specifically flogging in the ad: Andrew Dominik for Best Adapted Screenplay, at the exclusion of Roger Deakins for Cinematography, which should be a lock? Sounds like a contractual obligation. Maybe more egregiously, the ad has room for the names of five producers, but no push for Casey Affleck as Best Supporting Actor?

I know, I know––gift horse, mouth, blah blah blah. Tell me why I’m wrong in the comments.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • bodytext


Related Posts:

4 Comments

  1. Posted November 26, 2007 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    You’re right.

  2. Posted November 26, 2007 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    You’re not wrong. It’s totally contractual obligation. Especially considering only 3 producers are eligible for a best picture statue, anyway!

  3. Cherie
    Posted November 28, 2007 at 5:31 am | Permalink

    I absolutely agree with you on the fact that Warner Bros. pretty much sabotaged this film. Which is a shame, as it is a brilliant movie.

    Moreso, the performances of Affleck and Pitt were outstanding. Heck, Pitt even won Best Actor at Venince! Both are awards worthy, IMO. I certainly think it was Affleck’s best performance, and it just may be Pitt’s best role as well.

    I seen this film twice while it was here in Cleveland and am astounded by the lack of support from the studio.

  4. Lisa
    Posted December 19, 2007 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    Casey Affleck should win the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. He was amazing!

One Trackback

  1. By Movie Marketing Madness » Quick Takes: 11/27/07 on November 27, 2007 at 11:01 am

    [...] is wondering what exactly the thinking is behind the names included on Warner Bros.’ “For Your [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*