Comments on: Jesse James Under Consideration? http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/26/jesse-james-under-consideration/ Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:54:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Lisa http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/26/jesse-james-under-consideration/#comment-47316 Lisa Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:55:40 +0000 http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/26/jesse-james-under-consideration/#comment-47316 Casey Affleck should win the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. He was amazing! Casey Affleck should win the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. He was amazing!

]]> By: Cherie http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/26/jesse-james-under-consideration/#comment-33992 Cherie Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:31:09 +0000 http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/26/jesse-james-under-consideration/#comment-33992 I absolutely agree with you on the fact that Warner Bros. pretty much sabotaged this film. Which is a shame, as it is a brilliant movie. Moreso, the performances of Affleck and Pitt were outstanding. Heck, Pitt even won Best Actor at Venince! Both are awards worthy, IMO. I certainly think it was Affleck's best performance, and it just may be Pitt's best role as well. I seen this film twice while it was here in Cleveland and am astounded by the lack of support from the studio. I absolutely agree with you on the fact that Warner Bros. pretty much sabotaged this film. Which is a shame, as it is a brilliant movie.

Moreso, the performances of Affleck and Pitt were outstanding. Heck, Pitt even won Best Actor at Venince! Both are awards worthy, IMO. I certainly think it was Affleck’s best performance, and it just may be Pitt’s best role as well.

I seen this film twice while it was here in Cleveland and am astounded by the lack of support from the studio.

]]> By: Movie Marketing Madness » Quick Takes: 11/27/07 http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/26/jesse-james-under-consideration/#comment-32951 Movie Marketing Madness » Quick Takes: 11/27/07 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:01:00 +0000 http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/26/jesse-james-under-consideration/#comment-32951 [...] is wondering what exactly the thinking is behind the names included on Warner Bros.’ “For Your [...] [...] is wondering what exactly the thinking is behind the names included on Warner Bros.’ “For Your [...]

]]> By: Mark Rabinowitz http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/26/jesse-james-under-consideration/#comment-32130 Mark Rabinowitz Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:00:05 +0000 http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/26/jesse-james-under-consideration/#comment-32130 You're not wrong. It's totally contractual obligation. Especially considering only 3 producers are eligible for a best picture statue, anyway! You’re not wrong. It’s totally contractual obligation. Especially considering only 3 producers are eligible for a best picture statue, anyway!

]]> By: Karsten http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/26/jesse-james-under-consideration/#comment-31802 Karsten Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:25:48 +0000 http://blog.spout.com/2007/11/26/jesse-james-under-consideration/#comment-31802 You're right. You’re right.

]]>