<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gawker: Scorn as Publishing Model and the Return of Sincerity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2007/12/03/gawker-scorn-as-publishing-model-and-the-return-of-sincerity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2007/12/03/gawker-scorn-as-publishing-model-and-the-return-of-sincerity/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jlichman</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2007/12/03/gawker-scorn-as-publishing-model-and-the-return-of-sincerity/#comment-37209</link>
		<dc:creator>jlichman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2007/12/03/gawker-scorn-as-publishing-model-and-the-return-of-sincerity/#comment-37209</guid>
		<description>wait, does this all boil down to gawker being the mumblecore of blogs?

because if so, who is their bishop allen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait, does this all boil down to gawker being the mumblecore of blogs?</p>
<p>because if so, who is their bishop allen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnes Varnum</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2007/12/03/gawker-scorn-as-publishing-model-and-the-return-of-sincerity/#comment-37176</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnes Varnum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2007/12/03/gawker-scorn-as-publishing-model-and-the-return-of-sincerity/#comment-37176</guid>
		<description>Just so no one claims I'm a total square, I do indulge in a little guilty pleasure with completely over-the-top sites, like PerezHilton.com as an example, but I'm pretty sure there was a period of time where I didn't quite realize what Gawker was all about. It can be tough to distinguish personal voices and corporate messaging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so no one claims I&#8217;m a total square, I do indulge in a little guilty pleasure with completely over-the-top sites, like PerezHilton.com as an example, but I&#8217;m pretty sure there was a period of time where I didn&#8217;t quite realize what Gawker was all about. It can be tough to distinguish personal voices and corporate messaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Beware: CNet &#38; Gawker&#160;by&#160;Resources</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2007/12/03/gawker-scorn-as-publishing-model-and-the-return-of-sincerity/#comment-37171</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Beware: CNet &#38; Gawker&#160;by&#160;Resources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2007/12/03/gawker-scorn-as-publishing-model-and-the-return-of-sincerity/#comment-37171</guid>
		<description>[...] Karina Longworth over at Spout adds some more insider info about Gawker and shares her own always perceptive take. Tags: media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Karina Longworth over at Spout adds some more insider info about Gawker and shares her own always perceptive take. Tags: media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
