Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

More on JUNO and the “Crossover” Issue

Karina Longworth
By Karina Longworth posted 1 year ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

So. Tired. Of. Talking. About. Juno.

Look, let’s get one thing straight: in that post that I wrote earlier this week,  I wasn’t making a statement about Juno’s quality. I’ve done that elsewhere, but at this point it seems like my energy would be best directed elsewhere–it’s not THAT offensive, and it’s certainly better than Little Miss Sunshine. All I was saying, is that the idea that this film has “crossed over” from an “indie” sphere to mainstream success is a fiction created and promoted by Fox Searchlight in order to align Juno with past “crossover” successes. This is working for them, so that’s great. But the idea that Juno is “small”, that it’s some kind of an underdog––either at the box office or within the clusterfuck of award’s season––is categorically insane.

It’s also somewhat troubling to think that if this kind of marketing coup works so well once, it’ll almost certainly work again, and at some point, there won’t be room in the marketplace for actual “small” films that have actually “crossed over”, because they’ll be pushed out of the conversation by studio films (I don’t care how much Juno cost to produce–it was paid for by a studio and it has the full benefit of a studio’s marketing apparatus) masquerading as “small” “crossovers.”

I don’t think I have anything left to say about this, but feel free to have at it/me in the comments.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • M. Robert Turnage said

    I love the fact that the discussion of film is more often than not a discussion of film marketing. Much like how sex advice columns more often than not wind up being relationship advice columns, what we say we do and what we actually do are not really related.

  • Karina Longworth said

    Well, sometimes people have relationships with the people they have sex with. Sometimes the way a film is marketed is more interesting to talk about than the film itself.

  • David Poland said

    I am so sick of that game.

    Can’t someone have an opinion of a film AND an opinion
    about the world into which the film is being sold? It’s
    like people are pained about the fact that the people who
    fund movies care more about marketing than the movies and
    then the messenger has to be shot.

    And shooting Karina??? Of all of us?

    You know, I am now Mr Old School to people like Karina and
    Stu VA and the Reverse Shot kids. I am some industry rotted
    fogey… and great! I can take it. I don’t write for
    everyone. I write for me. And like anyone else
    who is trying to do something good, there is no choice. If
    you are writing for others, you are very unlikely to do
    work that is remotely interesting.

    And unlike Traditional Media, no one is forcing anyone to read it.

  • M. Robert Turnage said

    >Sometimes the way a film is
    >marketed is more interesting
    >to talk about than the film itself.

    This is very true. My favorite example of marketing overshadowing the film itself is ‘The Blair Witch Project’.