Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

Oscars: Will JUNO Benefit From a Split Decision?

Karina Longworth
By Karina Longworth posted 1 year ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

The hot new meme in Oscar prognostication: what if the two “serious” Best Picture frontrunners split the sane vote, thus clearing a path for Juno to take the year’s top prize with a mere fraction of the Academy’s total support? Scott Feinberg elaborates:

[Juno] is heating up at just the right time. Also, I am presently of the belief that No Country for Old Men and There Will Be Blood will split the vote of those who feel the need to support a completely ’serious’ film, and that Juno—which might have enough passionate support anyway—would be the most obvious beneficiary…

I believe to this day that Little Miss Sunshine would have won Best Picture last year had Martin Scorsese not been in the Best Director race… Try as they might, No Country backers will not be able to elicit the same sense of obligation among Oscar voters to seize this opportunity to honor the Coens, and so there will be no coattail effect this year—in fact, I think we probably will see a Picture-Director split.

It could happen. But ST Van Airsdale––otherwise known as The Reeler, now also blogging at Vanity Fair’s Little Gold Men awards sub-site––really, really hopes it doesn’t.

[N]ot everyone wins come February 24, and, frankly, I don’t want to see Juno within a thousand feet of the Kodak Theater. I want her and her twee champions stopped at the metal detector…Juno could conceivably sneak to victory with less than a third of the Academy in its corner, thus completing its underdog lap around Hollywood and bulletproofing the myth of the Academy as a meritocratic institution. It would be politics as usual, and two years after Crash, we just can’t have that.

Look, I’m on the record on this: If Juno wins, it will be equivalent to Oliver! being declared, in the same year in which 2001 and Faces were nominated in other categories, as the best film of 1968. But it could also be a good thing in the long run: in the wake of that shame, the Academy took a sharp turn the following year and gave Best Picture to Midnight Cowboy, and nine nominations to They Shoot Horses, Don’t They. If There Will Be Blood falls to a film that blatantly rips off So I Married an Axe Murderer, I can only imagine what the disgruntled, disenfranchised Academy voters might do next year as a corrective.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • Christopher Campbell said

    You better stop hating on Oliver! or I will come over and sing “Who Will Buy” in the highest little-boy falsetto I can reach.

  • goran said

    Babe was much more tolerable than Braveheart.

  • ‘Juno’ Gets Set to Crash the Oscar Party - Film School Rejects said

    [...] Airsdale is referring to the tight race that has begun to unfold in the race for best picture. As Karina Longworth explains, “The hot new meme in Oscar prognostication: what if the two “serious” Best [...]

  • jack said

    I wasn’t at all surprised to see it lose. No Country for Old Men was the obvious winner to me, regardless of it being inferior to Michael Clayton, Atonement, There Will Be Blood, and especially Juno. The only two I saw Juno winning were total no brainers. Best Original Screenplay and Ellen Page’s Best Actress Award. I guess I was wrong again. Ellen was robbed, there’s no doubt about it. The Academy is all about shedding light on decent films while letting the truly great ones go unawarded. Juno deserved every award it was nominated for. No Country wasone of this movies that I found to be terribly boring and uneventful.
    And Slumdog this year? Really? Psh. Academy sucks.