<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stop-Loss at SXSW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: actionman</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/#comment-119460</link>
		<dc:creator>actionman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/#comment-119460</guid>
		<description>Stop-Loss is a great film.  It's hardly anti-American.  In fact, it's extremely pro-soldier and pro-military.  It's just that the filmmakers are disgusted -- and rightfully so -- with political policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop-Loss is a great film.  It&#8217;s hardly anti-American.  In fact, it&#8217;s extremely pro-soldier and pro-military.  It&#8217;s just that the filmmakers are disgusted &#8212; and rightfully so &#8212; with political policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/#comment-118451</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/#comment-118451</guid>
		<description>Why would a government adopt a policy of stop loss after a major conflcit. It's brutal on our forces whether it's being discloused or not. I don't agree with the policy because it's socialst in nature. When secret societies dictate our war policies so that their children are excluded from war , we have abandoned our democratic process to allow a submersive process of collusion to dictate our nations 
political policies. Don't we have a right to know how our government works ? 

Is the military program of Stop Loss directly related to the repercussion of Watergate and should these policies be halted ? When Mark Felt { Deep Throat }  leaked the information that a policy of war had been signed into our Executive that would exclude certain members and sectors of our society from having to serve in the military , are the current policies of Stop Loss what they had in mind ? Although the Stop Loss policy has some redeeming benefits , it's long term goals are mainly responsible for the fatigue and exhaustion of our current troops. The personal effort in the military has become so desperate that you have some soldiers serving in war zones while taking psychological medications and sleeping pills. Considering the long and short term effects of this policy , it appears genocidal in nature and unfair to the military personnel that have so boldly volunteered to serve and defend our country. Please take a minute through the holiday season and think about the people defending your nation and write your legislators and demand the program of Stop Loss be stopped. 

Reference = All The President's Men / Un Censored - Warner Editions 1st Edition - ( Simon And Shuster are all Censored ) 
Reported that Mark Felt Leaked that A System To Delete The Need For War was signed into the Executive and that a Black Operational Government had been incorporated into our government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would a government adopt a policy of stop loss after a major conflcit. It&#8217;s brutal on our forces whether it&#8217;s being discloused or not. I don&#8217;t agree with the policy because it&#8217;s socialst in nature. When secret societies dictate our war policies so that their children are excluded from war , we have abandoned our democratic process to allow a submersive process of collusion to dictate our nations<br />
political policies. Don&#8217;t we have a right to know how our government works ? </p>
<p>Is the military program of Stop Loss directly related to the repercussion of Watergate and should these policies be halted ? When Mark Felt { Deep Throat }  leaked the information that a policy of war had been signed into our Executive that would exclude certain members and sectors of our society from having to serve in the military , are the current policies of Stop Loss what they had in mind ? Although the Stop Loss policy has some redeeming benefits , it&#8217;s long term goals are mainly responsible for the fatigue and exhaustion of our current troops. The personal effort in the military has become so desperate that you have some soldiers serving in war zones while taking psychological medications and sleeping pills. Considering the long and short term effects of this policy , it appears genocidal in nature and unfair to the military personnel that have so boldly volunteered to serve and defend our country. Please take a minute through the holiday season and think about the people defending your nation and write your legislators and demand the program of Stop Loss be stopped. </p>
<p>Reference = All The President&#8217;s Men / Un Censored - Warner Editions 1st Edition - ( Simon And Shuster are all Censored )<br />
Reported that Mark Felt Leaked that A System To Delete The Need For War was signed into the Executive and that a Black Operational Government had been incorporated into our government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NatyP</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/#comment-78765</link>
		<dc:creator>NatyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/#comment-78765</guid>
		<description>I have been reading a lot of comments and opinions on this film lately, and honestly all of the commentary is making me what to see this movie more. I have always been a big fan of Kimberly Pierce's work, and have faith that she will carry out an important message in this new project of hers. She always does such a great job of bringing to light subject matters that are normally ignored or overlooked. I guess I'm not going to formulate an opinion until I actually watch the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading a lot of comments and opinions on this film lately, and honestly all of the commentary is making me what to see this movie more. I have always been a big fan of Kimberly Pierce&#8217;s work, and have faith that she will carry out an important message in this new project of hers. She always does such a great job of bringing to light subject matters that are normally ignored or overlooked. I guess I&#8217;m not going to formulate an opinion until I actually watch the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop Loss to Premiere at SXSW with Controversial Trailer &#124; TakePart Blog Network</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/#comment-71156</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop Loss to Premiere at SXSW with Controversial Trailer &#124; TakePart Blog Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/#comment-71156</guid>
		<description>[...] returns from war in Iraq, only to be told her has to go back and the new trailer is already fueling conversations in the blogosphere about it&#8217;s anti-war message and whether it goes too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] returns from war in Iraq, only to be told her has to go back and the new trailer is already fueling conversations in the blogosphere about it&#8217;s anti-war message and whether it goes too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty Harry</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/#comment-68997</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirty Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/01/28/stop-loss-at-sxsw/#comment-68997</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the link. But you know it's gonna suck. And you know we're gonna be right that it sucks --and anti-American, and pro-lose-in-Iraq.

My record is spotless in these matter, Karina. Just hope you believe that I'd love to be wrong. How I'd love to be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the link. But you know it&#8217;s gonna suck. And you know we&#8217;re gonna be right that it sucks &#8211;and anti-American, and pro-lose-in-Iraq.</p>
<p>My record is spotless in these matter, Karina. Just hope you believe that I&#8217;d love to be wrong. How I&#8217;d love to be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
