AdLand points to this print ad, purchased by Turner Classic Movies, which backhandedly “supports” the striking writers. A mock-up of a crumpled screenplay cover page, the ad encourages striking screenwriters to “keep it up” because, “After all, the greatest movies have already been written.”
It’s only surprising that TCM, a brand built on heavy fetishism of the old studio system, would so blatantly taunt the WGA, in that it’s a surprise to see ANYONE express an AMPTP-sympathetic position these days. But the ad has sparked an interesting conversation over at LAist. Of course, the ad is condescending. But is it actually more sinister than that?
“Heck, while we’re invoking the “classic” era of movies, I wonder why we don’t just bring back the Red Scare. We could take care of them commies in the WGA with some well times congressional hearings,” gripes commenter Ross A. Lincoln, to which commenter notgoth responds, “After sitting through numerous crappy sequels movies last year and terrible TV shows … TCM have a point.” This suggestion is immediately shut down by both Lincoln (”The reason there are so many shitty sequels isn’t because the writers are begging to do it. It’s the studio, with their eye on turning a quick buck for minimum expense.”) and commenter spoon, who points out that business hasn’t changed much since the “classic” era. “Remember, studio execs are the ones who wanted to cast Ryan O’ Neal as Michael Corleone in the Godfather, and Ronald Reagan as Rick in Casablanca. Their values and judgement haven’t changed much.”
It seems like there are two separate questions here. First: who’s responsible when contemporary Hollywood movies end up being really, really bad––the scribe who wrote the shit script, or the studio who payed her/him to do it? Second: if TCM is essentially selling nostalgia for the era of the studio contract system, when films were allegedly “better”, does buying into that nostalgia necessitate a wilful denial of the economic imperatives––not to mention unlawful vertical integration––that kept that system running? Discuss.
This is one of the most bizarre ads I’ve ever seen in any medium. It just throws up all sorts of questions. What interest would TCM have in insulting one side or the other in this standoff?
And: Who’s this ad aimed at, actually? Current and potential TCM viewers, presumably. But is that really a “they don’t make ‘em like they used to” sort of crowd? What does TCM know about its viewers that I might not guess - that they watch the channel as a preferable alternative to new movies rather than as a supplement to them?
And this after a year widely regarded as one of the best for movies in a long while, particularly American movies.
Just baffling.
Well, the ad is Spanish and only running in Spain, so the ad is aimed at Spanish viewers who may not yet be familiar with TCM’s classic movie content.
Info found at the post about this ad on Adland, which is a working link unlike the one you have above.
http://commercial-archive.com/node/142586
My critisms of the WGA (not that I like the sleazy producers either) are as follows:
1) Bunch of spoiled rich kids who trot around in red T-shirts holding red flags as if they were downtrodden mining workers or something. They need to get a life - what they do is not labor, and they are not a labor union; they are a trade organization at best.
2) It seems hypocritical to demand revs from reality TV. Isn’t reality TV supposed to be spontaneous and by definition does not use any writers? What am I missing here?
3) Hard to feel sympathetic for a bunch of people who sit around bouncing superballs in writers’ labs all day, or irritating us in Starbucks with their clickity-clack laptops. Of course, producers are even worse, being among the lowest forms of life on the planet in terms of how the treat other people. Indeed, neither group attracts much sympathy from the general public.
4) It is about time the Ivy League and Seven Sisters English majors found another way to supplement their trust fund incomes.