<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TCM Taunts Striking Writers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/05/tcm-taunts-striking-writers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/05/tcm-taunts-striking-writers/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ndriley97</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/05/tcm-taunts-striking-writers/#comment-78786</link>
		<dc:creator>ndriley97</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/05/tcm-taunts-striking-writers/#comment-78786</guid>
		<description>My critisms of the WGA (not that I like the sleazy producers either) are as follows:

1) Bunch of spoiled rich kids who trot around in red T-shirts holding red flags as if they were downtrodden mining workers or something. They need to get a life - what they do is not labor, and they are not a labor union; they are a trade organization at best.

2) It seems hypocritical to demand revs from reality TV. Isn't reality TV supposed to be spontaneous and by definition does not use any writers? What am I missing here?

3) Hard to feel sympathetic for a bunch of people who sit around bouncing superballs in writers' labs all day, or irritating us in Starbucks with their clickity-clack laptops. Of course, producers are even worse, being among the lowest forms of life on the planet in terms of how the treat other people. Indeed, neither group attracts much sympathy from the general public.

4) It is about time the Ivy League and Seven Sisters English majors found another way to supplement their trust fund incomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My critisms of the WGA (not that I like the sleazy producers either) are as follows:</p>
<p>1) Bunch of spoiled rich kids who trot around in red T-shirts holding red flags as if they were downtrodden mining workers or something. They need to get a life - what they do is not labor, and they are not a labor union; they are a trade organization at best.</p>
<p>2) It seems hypocritical to demand revs from reality TV. Isn&#8217;t reality TV supposed to be spontaneous and by definition does not use any writers? What am I missing here?</p>
<p>3) Hard to feel sympathetic for a bunch of people who sit around bouncing superballs in writers&#8217; labs all day, or irritating us in Starbucks with their clickity-clack laptops. Of course, producers are even worse, being among the lowest forms of life on the planet in terms of how the treat other people. Indeed, neither group attracts much sympathy from the general public.</p>
<p>4) It is about time the Ivy League and Seven Sisters English majors found another way to supplement their trust fund incomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter W</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/05/tcm-taunts-striking-writers/#comment-73865</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/05/tcm-taunts-striking-writers/#comment-73865</guid>
		<description>Well, the ad is Spanish and only running in Spain, so the ad is aimed at Spanish viewers who may not yet be familiar with TCM's classic movie content.

Info found at the post about this ad on Adland, which is a working link unlike the one you have above.
http://commercial-archive.com/node/142586</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the ad is Spanish and only running in Spain, so the ad is aimed at Spanish viewers who may not yet be familiar with TCM&#8217;s classic movie content.</p>
<p>Info found at the post about this ad on Adland, which is a working link unlike the one you have above.<br />
<a href="http://commercial-archive.com/node/142586" rel="nofollow">http://commercial-archive.com/node/142586</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hudson</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/05/tcm-taunts-striking-writers/#comment-73359</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/05/tcm-taunts-striking-writers/#comment-73359</guid>
		<description>This is one of the most bizarre ads I've ever seen in any medium. It just throws up all sorts of questions. What interest would TCM have in insulting one side or the other in this standoff? 

And: Who's this ad aimed at, actually? Current and potential TCM viewers, presumably. But is that really a "they don't make 'em like they used to" sort of crowd? What does TCM know about its viewers that I might not guess - that they watch the channel as a preferable alternative to new movies rather than as a supplement to them?

And this after a year widely regarded as one of the best for movies in a long while, particularly American movies. 

Just baffling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the most bizarre ads I&#8217;ve ever seen in any medium. It just throws up all sorts of questions. What interest would TCM have in insulting one side or the other in this standoff? </p>
<p>And: Who&#8217;s this ad aimed at, actually? Current and potential TCM viewers, presumably. But is that really a &#8220;they don&#8217;t make &#8216;em like they used to&#8221; sort of crowd? What does TCM know about its viewers that I might not guess - that they watch the channel as a preferable alternative to new movies rather than as a supplement to them?</p>
<p>And this after a year widely regarded as one of the best for movies in a long while, particularly American movies. </p>
<p>Just baffling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
