<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stumbling on the Road to Haneke Rehab</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84590</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 01:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84590</guid>
		<description>Don't make me come over there T. 
First Law of The Center of the Universe: If I'm reading it, it's for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t make me come over there T.<br />
First Law of The Center of the Universe: If I&#8217;m reading it, it&#8217;s for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.Holly</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84580</link>
		<dc:creator>T.Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84580</guid>
		<description>Wow, that was angry; who do *you* think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that was angry; who do *you* think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.Holly</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84579</link>
		<dc:creator>T.Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84579</guid>
		<description>Yeah, really.  I mean, who do think this stuff is written for?  Just because you get it on-line doesn't mean it's *for* you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, really.  I mean, who do think this stuff is written for?  Just because you get it on-line doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s *for* you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Garrett</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84572</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84572</guid>
		<description>Message received. I'm just saying: There's more than one way to read between the lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Message received. I&#8217;m just saying: There&#8217;s more than one way to read between the lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84555</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84555</guid>
		<description>I'm not going to tell a person who gets paid to write how to write, but I found the sentence misleading and I don't think clarifying it would've required the use of a bludgeon.

I can see I've already shut the door of discourse with my earlier snippy comment so I'll just leave it at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to tell a person who gets paid to write how to write, but I found the sentence misleading and I don&#8217;t think clarifying it would&#8217;ve required the use of a bludgeon.</p>
<p>I can see I&#8217;ve already shut the door of discourse with my earlier snippy comment so I&#8217;ll just leave it at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Garrett</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84550</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84550</guid>
		<description>Silly me, I thought the BO numbers would make that point perfectly clear. Maybe that's why I put them in the very next sentence. But now that you've pointed it out to me I see the error of my ways: Always better to bludgeon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly me, I thought the BO numbers would make that point perfectly clear. Maybe that&#8217;s why I put them in the very next sentence. But now that you&#8217;ve pointed it out to me I see the error of my ways: Always better to bludgeon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84543</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84543</guid>
		<description>It's true "saying something resonated with a certain aud is hardly casting a pic as a niche hit", but it's not casting a film as a stiff either, which Funny Games certainly seems to be.

Also, do you guys talk in Varietese like that when you're just standing around the watercooler shooting the shit?

I think I'm done being a jerk now. You may carry on about your business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true &#8220;saying something resonated with a certain aud is hardly casting a pic as a niche hit&#8221;, but it&#8217;s not casting a film as a stiff either, which Funny Games certainly seems to be.</p>
<p>Also, do you guys talk in Varietese like that when you&#8217;re just standing around the watercooler shooting the shit?</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m done being a jerk now. You may carry on about your business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84531</guid>
		<description>By the way, I'm not ashamed to admit I really liked the movie, although I watched the original the night before and definitely preferred it. My roommate hated it. It's a divisive film. It is polarizing audiences. Some argue it's trash, others say it makes a statement and takes an interesting position on American moviegoers' obsession with violence. To each their own. I'm watching Benny's Video this weekend on Netflix. Haneke may frustrate the viewers but his films always have meat to chew on, which is more than I can say for this week's new releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I&#8217;m not ashamed to admit I really liked the movie, although I watched the original the night before and definitely preferred it. My roommate hated it. It&#8217;s a divisive film. It is polarizing audiences. Some argue it&#8217;s trash, others say it makes a statement and takes an interesting position on American moviegoers&#8217; obsession with violence. To each their own. I&#8217;m watching Benny&#8217;s Video this weekend on Netflix. Haneke may frustrate the viewers but his films always have meat to chew on, which is more than I can say for this week&#8217;s new releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84527</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84527</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... maybe before we jump all over Variety for editorial gaffes, people should be a little more careful with their headlines, don't you think? Haneke has 1 N, not 2. Please post a correction. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; maybe before we jump all over Variety for editorial gaffes, people should be a little more careful with their headlines, don&#8217;t you think? Haneke has 1 N, not 2. Please post a correction. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Garrett</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84526</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84526</guid>
		<description>Karina -- thanks for alerting me to the production gaffe, which our web folk have now fixed.

I must take issue with your interpretation of my item, however. Saying something resonated with a certain aud is hardly casting a pic as a niche hit; there's a big reason for that qualifier.  

The fact is, some people LOVED the movie, and I'm not ashamed to say a dear friend is one of them. His description of the heated response at a Pasadena screening last weekend prompted me to write the item. 

It certainly wasn't a studio flack.

Anyway, thanks again for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karina &#8212; thanks for alerting me to the production gaffe, which our web folk have now fixed.</p>
<p>I must take issue with your interpretation of my item, however. Saying something resonated with a certain aud is hardly casting a pic as a niche hit; there&#8217;s a big reason for that qualifier.  </p>
<p>The fact is, some people LOVED the movie, and I&#8217;m not ashamed to say a dear friend is one of them. His description of the heated response at a Pasadena screening last weekend prompted me to write the item. </p>
<p>It certainly wasn&#8217;t a studio flack.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Kenny</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84517</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/2008/03/21/stumbling-on-the-road-to-hanneke-rehab/#comment-84517</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Maybe they're being, like, meta. As in the movie, itself, no? 

Probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Maybe they&#8217;re being, like, meta. As in the movie, itself, no? </p>
<p>Probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
