Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

Titicut Follies. Clip of the Day.

Karina Longworth
By Karina Longworth posted 1 year ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon


Alternative Reel recently placed Frederick Wiseman’s groundbreaking 1967 cinema verite doc Titicut Follies at the number 2 spot in their list of the Top Ten Banned Films of The 20th Century (what made number 1? Why, Cannibal Holocaust, of course!). The film, which offers a cold and often disturbing look at the lives anf treatment of criminally insane patients at a mental hospital inside a Massachusetts prison, was unavailable outside of educational use for 25 years, after the state Supreme Court declared it violated the patients’ rights to privacy. It’s now widely available––so widely available, in fact, that after about four seconds of digging, I found the film in its entirety on Google Video (see above). It’s an upload from a VHS tape, so it’s not perfect quality, but it’s adequate. For a wider screen, go directly to the Google Video page.

More on Titicut Follies:

Reverse Shot

Senses of Cinema

Bright Lights Film Journal

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • Paul Moore said

    Titicut Follies is on of those movies that ended and I immediately knew I’d never see film the same way. At the time I watched it, there was a bootleg copy some AV nerd had made when his college professor ponied up the $400 for 16mm print to show his class. Knowing it’s up on Google Video makes me feel the world is a better place.

  • cinetrix said

    Two quick clarifications and one fun fact.

    It’s the Supreme Judicial Court in Massachusetts, a commonwealth, and the hospital is not inside a prison, although it is administered by the DOC and the DMH and located on the same grounds as Old Colony correctional facility.

    And now the fun fact: A compromise–blurring the faces of those inmates at Bridgewater State Hospital for the Criminally Insane deemed incapable of giving informed consent–was proposed in 1989, three years before the PBS broadcast. It was during the first flush of home video, and the judge apparently didn’t understand that it was technologically impossible for Wiseman to blur the faces frame by frame even if he wanted to. [He didn't.] http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE4DC1431F933A0575AC0A96F948260

  • cinetrix said

    Sorry, should read four years, not three.

  • ilk said

    Since it appears to be gone, I suggest looking for it here.
    http://tinyurl.com/6×64hv

  • julie said

    fascinating

  • julie said

    although harsh, the subject matter needs to be told

  • julie tavares said

    impotant piece of work!