<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Porn and Peter Bart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2008/04/21/porn-and-peter-bart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/04/21/porn-and-peter-bart/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pornographer X</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/04/21/porn-and-peter-bart/#comment-104475</link>
		<dc:creator>Pornographer X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=2692#comment-104475</guid>
		<description>What are you smoking?  I find it amusing that someone who has no
part whatsoever in the porn industry goes off the whim making assumptions.
Sales are not suffering due to any economic woes, but moreso due to the proliferation of thieves pushing stolen content via virus infected tubesites</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you smoking?  I find it amusing that someone who has no<br />
part whatsoever in the porn industry goes off the whim making assumptions.<br />
Sales are not suffering due to any economic woes, but moreso due to the proliferation of thieves pushing stolen content via virus infected tubesites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kb</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/04/21/porn-and-peter-bart/#comment-96089</link>
		<dc:creator>kb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=2692#comment-96089</guid>
		<description>This piece didn't make sense. It felt hurried, it used half a dozen terms I had never heard without explaining them, and the observations seem vapid when delivered in the breathlessly cheeky tone of the piece. 

Correction, the observations 'are' vapid... Emasculation? Culture of adolescents? the Age of Unsexiness? Oh come ON - what a load of callow verbiage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This piece didn&#8217;t make sense. It felt hurried, it used half a dozen terms I had never heard without explaining them, and the observations seem vapid when delivered in the breathlessly cheeky tone of the piece. </p>
<p>Correction, the observations &#8216;are&#8217; vapid&#8230; Emasculation? Culture of adolescents? the Age of Unsexiness? Oh come ON - what a load of callow verbiage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/04/21/porn-and-peter-bart/#comment-92968</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=2692#comment-92968</guid>
		<description>I think its more than just the retreat into male adolescence, its also a sign of prolonged adolescence.  Marketers are recycling the same peer-pressure driven, hypersexualized images that appeal to male adolescents to stimulate the consumerism of 20somethings and 30+ males.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its more than just the retreat into male adolescence, its also a sign of prolonged adolescence.  Marketers are recycling the same peer-pressure driven, hypersexualized images that appeal to male adolescents to stimulate the consumerism of 20somethings and 30+ males.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
