http://blog.spout.com/2008/05/16/archaelogists-divided-on-indiana-jones/ Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:49:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 http://blog.spout.com/2008/05/16/archaelogists-divided-on-indiana-jones/#comment-99646 Christopher Thu, 22 May 2008 19:16:38 +0000 http://blog.spout.com/?p=2930#comment-99646 But, Patrick, Temple of Doom didn't involve a Biblical artifact either. But, Patrick, Temple of Doom didn’t involve a Biblical artifact either.

]]> http://blog.spout.com/2008/05/16/archaelogists-divided-on-indiana-jones/#comment-99611 patrick Thu, 22 May 2008 16:10:30 +0000 http://blog.spout.com/?p=2930#comment-99611 the thing i'm wondering is, how did they expect this new IJ to succeed cinematically without having Indy go after some Biblical artifact? the thing i’m wondering is, how did they expect this new IJ to succeed cinematically without having Indy go after some Biblical artifact?

]]>