<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex and the City: Not Just For Rich White Chicks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2008/06/06/sex-and-the-city-not-just-for-rich-white-chicks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/06/06/sex-and-the-city-not-just-for-rich-white-chicks/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sex videolari</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/06/06/sex-and-the-city-not-just-for-rich-white-chicks/#comment-135869</link>
		<dc:creator>sex videolari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=3078#comment-135869</guid>
		<description>Hiland makes a good point, but consider that Dante placed those who do violence to others and themselves in the 7th ring of Hell, whereas he placed all the flatterers, hypocrites, seducers and false counselors in the 8th. In other words, JACKASS isn't as serious an immoral abomination as SEX &#38; THE CITY and, of course, Oprah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiland makes a good point, but consider that Dante placed those who do violence to others and themselves in the 7th ring of Hell, whereas he placed all the flatterers, hypocrites, seducers and false counselors in the 8th. In other words, JACKASS isn&#8217;t as serious an immoral abomination as SEX &amp; THE CITY and, of course, Oprah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sex and the City Mega-Post at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/06/06/sex-and-the-city-not-just-for-rich-white-chicks/#comment-105910</link>
		<dc:creator>Sex and the City Mega-Post at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=3078#comment-105910</guid>
		<description>[...] the Spout Blog, Steven Boone talks to three black women about Sex and the City. The article opens: The most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Spout Blog, Steven Boone talks to three black women about Sex and the City. The article opens: The most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: white chicks &#124; Hottags</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/06/06/sex-and-the-city-not-just-for-rich-white-chicks/#comment-103883</link>
		<dc:creator>white chicks &#124; Hottags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=3078#comment-103883</guid>
		<description>[...] chicks    pay per click advertising Sex and the City: Not Just For Rich White ChicksThe second most idiotic comment I’ve heard in reference to Sex and the City is, “That show’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chicks    pay per click advertising Sex and the City: Not Just For Rich White ChicksThe second most idiotic comment I’ve heard in reference to Sex and the City is, “That show’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filmfledgling</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/06/06/sex-and-the-city-not-just-for-rich-white-chicks/#comment-103831</link>
		<dc:creator>filmfledgling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=3078#comment-103831</guid>
		<description> As a 27 y.o. black gay male, I became a fan of the show for it's sense of reality (in terms of storylines and relationships, not the closet space in a struggling columnist's apt.) yes, I cringed at the "Samantha's got Jungle Fever" episode, and it's unfortunate that most of the Af-am representation on the show amounted to stereotypes (trans/drag prostitutes, "loud" black women at a club, etc.), but then again that is probably apart of the reality for well off white Manhattanites, no?  

I haven't seen the film yet, so I can't judge how Hudson's character was framed, but ultimately, in such a white film people are going to conveniently see it as a "mammy/magical negro" role, when there could be something deeper going on.

All in all, I respect the SATC franchise for what it is, and don't expect a deeper agenda from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a 27 y.o. black gay male, I became a fan of the show for it&#8217;s sense of reality (in terms of storylines and relationships, not the closet space in a struggling columnist&#8217;s apt.) yes, I cringed at the &#8220;Samantha&#8217;s got Jungle Fever&#8221; episode, and it&#8217;s unfortunate that most of the Af-am representation on the show amounted to stereotypes (trans/drag prostitutes, &#8220;loud&#8221; black women at a club, etc.), but then again that is probably apart of the reality for well off white Manhattanites, no?  </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the film yet, so I can&#8217;t judge how Hudson&#8217;s character was framed, but ultimately, in such a white film people are going to conveniently see it as a &#8220;mammy/magical negro&#8221; role, when there could be something deeper going on.</p>
<p>All in all, I respect the SATC franchise for what it is, and don&#8217;t expect a deeper agenda from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a line dress</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/06/06/sex-and-the-city-not-just-for-rich-white-chicks/#comment-103824</link>
		<dc:creator>a line dress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=3078#comment-103824</guid>
		<description>[...] a 23 year old co-worker who looked like Wally Cleaver. The second most idiotic comment I??ve heardhttp://blog.spout.com/2008/06/06/sex-and-the-city-not-just-for-rich-white-chicks/Business Line Headlines Monday, November 19, 2001 The HinduAgriculture Cotton prices seen stable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a 23 year old co-worker who looked like Wally Cleaver. The second most idiotic comment I??ve heardhttp://blog.spout.com/2008/06/06/sex-and-the-city-not-just-for-rich-white-chicks/Business Line Headlines Monday, November 19, 2001 The HinduAgriculture Cotton prices seen stable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/06/06/sex-and-the-city-not-just-for-rich-white-chicks/#comment-103716</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=3078#comment-103716</guid>
		<description>I haven't read any perspectives on &lt;i&gt;SATC&lt;/I&gt; from POC, so thank you for this.  It seems that Hudson couldn't be cast as Carrie's equal, I wonder if the mostly-white female demographic would be uneasy with the introduction of a black woman of stature equal or greater to their own.

"They were white women dipped in chocolate."

So true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read any perspectives on <i>SATC</i> from POC, so thank you for this.  It seems that Hudson couldn&#8217;t be cast as Carrie&#8217;s equal, I wonder if the mostly-white female demographic would be uneasy with the introduction of a black woman of stature equal or greater to their own.</p>
<p>&#8220;They were white women dipped in chocolate.&#8221;</p>
<p>So true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/06/06/sex-and-the-city-not-just-for-rich-white-chicks/#comment-103708</link>
		<dc:creator>laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=3078#comment-103708</guid>
		<description>sex and the city is old news, yet every other post here is about it. seriously, no one fucking cares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sex and the city is old news, yet every other post here is about it. seriously, no one fucking cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
