It looks like John Waters has a new muse. In an interview with Pop Candy’s Whitney Matheson, the filmmaker discusses his upcoming Christmas movie Fruitcake––“imagine The Little Rascals if John Waters had directed it”––and has nothing but effusive praise for the film’s star, Johnny Knoxville:
Yeah, I love Johnny. He really personifies every male character that’s a good guy that I could write that would live in Baltimore. I think Jackass is very much in the spirit of what my early films were. He’s an anarchist, and I’m always happy to hang around anarchists. He’s a cultural anarchist.
Knoxville, of course, starred in Waters’ most recent feature, A Dirty Shame. And Waters has been vocal about his admiration of the prank punk turned actor before; he memorably stuck Jackass Number 2 in the (wait for it) number 2 slot of his Top Ten Films of 2006 list for Artforum, declaring it a triumph that Knoxville and his boys had the “number-one-grossing movie in America on its opening weekend—and the male stars eat shit and drink horse semen for real. They’re nude a lot, too. If this isn’t cultural terrorism, I don’t know what is.”
By now, we’re used to Waters cheerfully celebrating mainstream culture for co-opting his once-shocking provocations. I’ve never been entirely sure how I feel about it––complimenting a product of a Viacom subsidiary as an act of “cultural terrorism” is a little much, don’t you think?––but I don’t know…there’s something vaguely interesting about the idea of him taking this superfamous guy who he’s convinced is an “anarchist”, and putting him in a children’s film. Maybe Waters is finally co-opting his aesthetic back.
Also, Jackass is the closest mainstream culture gets to taking all the most macho things available (skateboarding, bro-ing out, hurting yourself on purpose) and turning them totally queer.
p.s. I love yr blogs
I had never really thought of how far jackass had pushed the limits of mainstream cinema before now. I dont know that i would go as far as considering it “cultural terrorism” though. That would imply that jackass was made to change society, or at least makes us think about it. Instead it was just a group of young males with too much spare time and way too much money. Jackass wasnt really anything more than a ltitle humiliation blended nicely with a healthy dose of anarchy. The impression I got was that Bam Margera was the ringleader and Johnny Knoxville was the sweet little frontman. Funny and irreverant as Johnny is, I think i was a slight cockup on your behalf to consider him to be the new Divine. It really is a chalk and cheese comparison and I find it hard to draw and similarities between the two. Dont get me wrong, great movies will be made… i just dont see johnny knoxville peforming felacio or eating excement anytime soon