10 films that saved their franchise
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

Review: The Wackness

Karina Longworth
By Karina Longworth posted 1 year ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Note: This review appeared in slightly different form during the Tribeca Film Festival.

I saw The Wackness last spring at a special screening held for the critics participating in the Moving Image Institute last week. Afterwards, Sony Classics president Michael Barker was asked about critical response to the film thus far. Barker disclaimed that “most major critics” hadn’t yet reviewed the film, but then said something surprisingly candid about the makeup of the film’s detractors. “What’s the demographic of the critics who don’t like it?” he began, starting a statement with a question in expert post-Robert Evans mogul style. “Female. Single. Mothers with teenage kids––they don’t like the movie.”

Who ever is doing research over at Sony deserves a raise. I fit just two of those descriptors, and I don’t like it, either.

Maybe it’s true that even professional critics struggle to get beyond their own natural demographic biases. A certain (very young, very male) segment of the film blogosphere lashed out at Sony for buying The Wackness towards the close of Sundance––not because they didn’t like the film, but because they loved the film so much that they were moved to protect it from what they saw as the risk of a mis-managed mainstream release. I thought this campaign was absolutely inane at the time—in the virtually non-existent narrative buying climate of Sundance 2008, the boys should have been happy that their pet project was picked up at all––but having finally seen the thing, I’m at no loss to explain why those writers have embraced this film. With its full-on, fully uncritical glorification of adolescent male self-indulgence and permanent immaturity, The Wackness is a kind of cinematic embodiment of certain tendencies that make the sub-AICN movie web go round.

Jonathan Levine’s second feature (his first as both writer and director), The Wackness is a semi-autobiographical period piece set in the summer of 1994. Luke Shapiro––a white, middle-class, graduating high school loner turned self-styled weed vendor with slang, costume and taste in mix tapes loosely adapted from the machine-gun toting black guys who supply him with product––serves smoke to the shrink stepdad of his long-time crush (played by Juno sidekick Olivia Thirlby, here slinging a different brand of hyper-silly slang) in exchange for psychiatric sessions. Though Luke longs for the easy out of psychotropic drugs (his plea: “Nah! I’m mad depressed, yo!”), Dr. Squires (a turned-up-to-11 Ben Kingsley; every note of this performance is a “Fuck it!” shrug-off of the restraints of taste) refuses to prescribe them. Instead, the good doctor insists that what both patient and doctor really need is to get laid.

So begins a friendship oblivious to the 40-something year age difference between the two voting-age boys, but nonetheless susceptible to all of the textbook Unlikely Friendship cliches in the Indiewood universe. But if Levine shows little insight in his sketch of the way these boys play together, at least he show some inspired (if improbably reductive) paranoia in drawing the landscape on which they play. New York circa 1994 is depicted as a fading Babylon, each resident squirming in the summer heat and struggling to break free from the recently-installed Mayor Giuliani’s apparently omnipotent social control. America’s Mayor, though never seen, is referenced as a scourge more than once by nearly everyone encountered on Luke’s travails. When Luke and Squires’ big boys night out in search of ass ends in a jail cell, the message is hammered home: Giuliani’s mad emasculating, yo!

Though there’s something to be said for “ejaculation=social defiance” as a driving metaphor, The Wackness soon mellows into a story of first love, and it loses all credibility in the process. It’s never clear why we’re supposed to take Luke seriously as a protagonist or sympathize with his plight (which amounts to losing his virginity for realsies, and, far less convincingly, to saving his family home by upping his pot proceeds), but as long as the option is open to laugh at him, The Wackness has a certain goofy charm. But Levine asks us to make a whiplash-inducing transition to emotional investment in the film’s final 45 minutes, and the film suffers for this dive for depth. Boys just want to have fun? Sure, fine, whatever––there are worse ways for the kids to spend their summer afternoons than on a Giuliani-mocking stoner comedy set to De La Soul and early Biggie. But to ask us to take the cartoon character at the center of this farce as a legitimate tragic hero is to insult the audience. Or maybe I just couldn’t roll with it because I’m a girl, yo.

Will kids go see it? MOnths ago, I assumed it was a sure thing, but maybe all those blog boys were right to worry. I haven’t seen the kind of blanket advertising that might be necessary to convince the kids that The Wackness is Juno for boys, both an education in recent popular culture history and a handbook to timeless touchstones of adolescence (ie: speaking in racially slippery slang and trying to get girls drunk enough that they’re willing to fuck you in public). But there’s still a chance the film will be well served by the community of (young, male) web critics cheering it on. And can you really begrudge their enthusiasm? The Wackness is an un-critical celebration of out-of-control adolescent male id, of being a walking hard-on who is never wrong. Just like their websites.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • News » about : single white female said

    [...] blogs related to [single white female] Mirth and Woe:(C)Rap Tuesday afternoons. Maths, then double Music. Double Music, as if single Music wasn’t bad enough. The entire experience was made a complete joy by the two teachers (names changed in case they are of a vengeful bent): Mrs Clarkson, a joyless harpy who taught us to sing by shouting at us a lot; and Mr Willis, six feet of beanpole in a three-piece suit toped with an afro. We weren’t sure exactly what his role was in the entire set-up, but he forced us to listen to classic(Quote from : ?Mirth and Woe:(C)Rap?) Well on my birthday I wanted to go out to see some art. I trained in art, have a master’s, so of course I like to look at it. Chicago at the moment my current favorite place to see it. Well, next to France. Especially in gigantic rooms of contemporary works with big white walls and if possible in the hands of Alan Bates ( yes, I know he’s gone) with An Unmarried Woman playing in my mind. I might say in the “studio” of that Alan Bates as his model or something equally ridiculous. But fantasies, (Quote from : ?“Broadly” speaking…antidada-dote?) Jump to the full entry & travel map San Diego, California, United States It’s been a couple of weeks since I’ve written. I was planning to jump straight in and tell you all about Fiji but just before I left New Zealand I had an amazing trip so I’m going to put in a little bit about that first! I nearly wasn’t going to do the Tongariro crossing but in the end I thought I may as well. And I was so glad I did! It’s basically a long walk across a mountain range (well, a small mountain range (Quote from : ?Crossing datelines, time zones and borders - San Diego, California, United States?) Give It Up This is conference coverage of the Search Marketing Expo Advanced 2008 event. There was an “embargo” on releasing these session notes until this time. Enjoy these outstanding SEO tips. Give It Up! - No more secrets time. In this session, our panel of noted SEOs all share some of their favorite and largely overlooked SEO tips. Then we turn to the audience for more sharing. Attendees vow not to blog what’s discussed for the now traditional 30 day waiting period. Search reps in the a(Quote from : ?Give It Up?) Note: This review appeared in slightly different form during the Tribeca Film Festival. I saw The Wackness last spring at a special screening held for the critics participating in the Moving Image Institute last week. Afterwards, Sony Classics president Michael Barker was asked about critical response to the film thus far. Barker disclaimed that “most major critics” hadn’t yet reviewed the film, but then said something surprisingly candid about the makeup of the film’s detractors. “What’s th(Quote from : ?Review: The Wackness?) [...]

  • love is cartoon said

    [...] the critics participating in the Moving Image Institute last week. Afterwards, Sony Classics presidehttp://blog.spout.com/2008/07/03/review-the-wackness/I LOVE CARTOONS!These are all pieces that I personally own and have collected as part of a [...]

  • Erin D. said

    This review is so fantastic. The Wackness just looked to me like Roger Dodger 2.0, I do not get the hype.

    But then again, I’m a single female so perhaps I am not meant to know.

  • alex said

    why cant drake and josh be back on the screens plzz i need them i need sexy josh

  • alex said

    god u r hot josh lol get back to me plzzzzzzzzzzz u will make my day