Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

Hancock twist is a lemon. WARNING: Hancock spoiler alert

By Adam Forrest posted 1 year ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

hancockI get suspicious when a movie becomes famous for its twist.

Sure there’s the kind of twist that makes you want to watch the whole thing over again right away (like in The Sixth Sense, Memento, and A History of Violence). But when the best running gag in a movie is the character doesn’t like to be called an “asshole,” you can’t rely on a twist to give the film more juice.

Hancock hits a point where you can practically feel the filmmaker say, “Oh shit, this is going nowhere, so we better surprise them.” And then the twist comes with the subtlety of saying “Oh by the way, I forgot to mention…”

M. Night Shyamalan has become the master of the BTW twist. “Oh by the way, Samuel L. Jackson’s a bad guy,” (“They called me Mr. Glass!” Scary.) “Oh by the way, this Village is in modern times.” And now Peter Berg pulls a Shyamalan: “Oh by the way, Will Smith and Charlize Theron have been married for 3,000 years.” (Any reason for 3,000? It’s longer than shit, but just shy of eternity?)

So, the twist goes like this:

For inexplicable reasons when two superheroes are together their powers fade (no X-Men like battle scenes in the future for this franchise!). So, when Charlize Theron just starts telling Hancock they’re “the last ones,” she also throws in a little bit about how she became a bigamist once she saw Hancock no longer recognized her, post skull fracture, which was brought on by her bootylicious presence.

Anyway, lesson to script doctors: if the movie isn’t already humming along, no twist can make your movie roar.

Oh by the way, I’m writing this naked.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • Alex said

    I know I’ve cut other movies less slack for having such a poorly realized story, but it’s because I was having so much fun with it that I give it a pass. Plus, it feels like poor editing choices rather than poor writing. There’s a story there, and it was probably all shot, but the test audiences probably hated it, forcing the producers to say, “Let’s cut out everything that isn’t a gag or an action sequence except for Charlize’s exposition in the hospital.”

    There has to be a longer, fleshed-out director’s cut that explains everything. I came out of the movie feeling like I got up to go to the bathroom a couple of times and no one filled me in on what I missed.

  • Alex said

    And one more thing… am I really the only person who knew from the trailer that Charlize was super too? I didn’t see it as a BTW twist at all. Why else would she be in the movie? To elicit chants of “Mr. F!” from the audience whenever we see her with Jason Bateman? Come on!

  • badMike said

    I’m not sure what you’re saying when the filmmaker’s chose to include the “twist.” It was painfully obvious from Charlize’s atrocious overacting from the first scene on when she acts either shifty or bug-eyed around Will Smith. The twist must have always been a part of the script.

    I was more shocked by the needless, excessive cursing. Who was this movie really meant for? The whole product felt like a kids movie, except for the out-of-place foul language. I couldn’t figure out what tone they were going for.

  • ryan said

    It was not a twist ending like M night’s the so called twist was revealed about midway, those huge action sequences resulting from the so called twist could not be just thrown in there to fix the movie script, it was obviously planed, its a superhero movie and you have to take that at face value. It goes more like this: delinquent superhero becomes reformed but still has amnesia, meets his superhero wife , past comes back to haunt him, they almost die, good guys win. I like it that it was a comic book style movie that did not take it self so seriously, a refreshing twist from the regular formula. Regarding the bigamist comment they are separated and alive for at least 3000 years so I don’t think they need to go to the courthouse and get a divorce certificate for her not to be a bigamist. I did think it would be possible for them to hook up safely in remote locations considering they both can fly so the permanent separation not exactly needed but its a comic book style movie I don’t think everything needs to be explained.

  • scott said

    Well, I thought it was a great movie with a great shocking twist, turned out to be a love story, we all loved it!
    A++

  • Chris said

    Scott = studio plant

    I mean, really. He’s got to be, right? Nobody in real life thinks, let alone writes, something like this.