<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bogdanovich and Cuban, The New Odd Couple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2008/07/09/bogdanovich-and-cuban-the-new-odd-couple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/07/09/bogdanovich-and-cuban-the-new-odd-couple/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: futureoffilm</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/07/09/bogdanovich-and-cuban-the-new-odd-couple/#comment-108177</link>
		<dc:creator>futureoffilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 22:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=3315#comment-108177</guid>
		<description>Cuban is constantly carping on the cost of marketing. This may well be a legit concern, so i understand where he's coming from as a distributor (Magnolia). What I can't understand is the benefit of day-and-date (before-date?) for Landmark. Is anyone else concerned that the owner of the nations largest art house chain doesn't seem to care about theatrical release?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuban is constantly carping on the cost of marketing. This may well be a legit concern, so i understand where he&#8217;s coming from as a distributor (Magnolia). What I can&#8217;t understand is the benefit of day-and-date (before-date?) for Landmark. Is anyone else concerned that the owner of the nations largest art house chain doesn&#8217;t seem to care about theatrical release?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
