Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

The Sexy Tramp: Monsieur Verdoux and Charlie Chaplin as Stud

Lauren Wissot
By Lauren Wissot posted 1 year ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

For weeks I’d been raving to anyone and everyone that the recent re-release of Chaplin’s controversial 1947 Monsieur Verdoux, in which the Tramp sheds moustache and cane to become a gold digging serial killer of wealthy widows, is one of the finest films of the year. So I wasn’t surprised when an actress/comedienne friend of mine on the west coast emailed to say she’d just rented and laugh-out-loud adored it. What did give me pause was her follow-up, “That scene where he woos the rich woman in the parlor at the beginning, and also the one where he’s in the flower shop ordering roses…is it wrong for me to have the hots for a clown? Chaplin is so fuckin’ sexy!”

My answer: not only is it not wrong, but Chaplin wouldn’t have been believable mesmerizing his prey in Monsieur Verdoux if he hadn’t finally allowed his natural sexual charisma to shine through. For his entire career up until then Chaplin had been masking his virility beneath a shabby overcoat like a drag queen packing away her package. Monsieur Verdoux is perhaps the closest character to the real, really-young-women loving, multiple wed Hollywood legend than any other role he ever undertook. Verdoux’s seducing and serial killing of old coots seems like a screen-friendly substitute for Chaplin’s real-life seduction and serial impregnation of teenage girls.

That Chaplin couldn’t keep his dick in his pants was slave to his insatiable libido, is part of the hedonistic fabric of Tinseltown lore. His indulgence in erotic escapades with the underage rivaled that of Mae West with her muscle boys. The difference was that Miss West was out and proud, always playing a version of her raunchy self, while Chaplin was a closeted pervert, one of the richest, most powerful men in the motion picture business, forever acting the hard knocked innocent. (It ain’t for nothing that director Richard Attenborough chose the equal parts talented and hunky Robert Downey Jr., a man every bit as uncomfortable with his sexuality as Chaplin, to portray the titular character in his 1992 tabloid biopic.)

Where Miss West had her knowing smirk, Monsieur Verdoux has that devilish twinkle in his eyes that acts as a magnet for the Prince Charming-vulnerable women. Patient, doting, seemingly obsessed with the widows’ wellbeing, Verdoux is the ultimate paternal ego feeder, not unlike Chaplin must have been to his little Lolitas. And because Verdoux has convinced himself that it’s all for the good of his invalid wife and young child at home, he’s a carefree companion, a guilt-free assassin. Through the lens of this HUAC era flick it’s easy to view Chaplin’s many marriages as attempted “legitimizations” of his girl fetish rather than symbols of true love, the most natural way for a deviant to exculpate himself.

And though the Tramp was chaste he certainly didn’t lack passion––Chaplin’s signature character was forever dreamy and lovesick, and ultimately as childlike as the jailbait Chaplin collected. There was Hetty Kelly who Chaplin fell for when she was just 15, soon followed by child actress Mildred Harris (at age 16), Lita Grey (also at age 16), then the old maids Georgia Hale (at age 19) and finally Oona O’Neill (at age 18). (And these are just the well known nubile virgins!) As predatory as Chaplin seems to have been, and setting aside the inevitable talk of daddy issues, these girls were swept up in the very sexual allure of Hollywood that Chaplin embodied, and helped invent. He was the Big Bad Wolf––the sexiest character in the storybook. While the Tramp may be a near eunuch, no doubt Sir Charles Chaplin would have been a larger-than-life lay.

Movie stars, like politicians, are media giants for a reason. Big charisma, massive talent and huge ambition – all prerequisites for stardom. Why should their erotic appetites be any smaller? Besides, it’s naïve to think one can separate the creative force from the sexual (after all, creative has its roots in “to create,” be it babies or blockbusters!) Chaplin’s lust for his art, an all-consuming fire, wasn’t put out when he called cut at the end of the day.

A new print of Monsieur Verdoux is currently making the rounds of rep houses, courtesy of The Film Desk. It opens in Seattle on Friday. It’s also available on DVD, in Volume 2 of The Chaplin Collection.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • hunnybunch said

    “Hetty Kelly who Chaplin fell for when she was just 15…” — you fail to mention that he was 19 years old at the time.

    although he *should* have kept “his dick in his pants”, as you say, calling chaplin a pedo is harsh. true, he was far from being a saint, but you should also get some of your facts straight. eg. lita’s mother presented her daughter as of age when she was signed onto “gold rush” and then kept pushing her daughter into a relationship with her employer. and oona became pregnant *after* she was married to chaplin.

    as for his first wife: yes, he *did* bed her when he was nearly 30 years old (something screams panettiere/ventimiglia in the back of my head…), but the gold-digger also tricked him into the marriage by pretending to be pregnant.

  • dddd said

    If there was such a thing as detecting lies, then every boy or man over 14 and under 100 years of age would be in trouble. Men have always been attracted to teenage virgins. It called normal. In most countries girls were legally married at 12 years of age for thousands of years. Enough with the hatred. almost every straight guy on earth lover teenage girls even if they pretend they don’t.

  • Laura August said

    Oh man, I love my fellow Chaplin fans!

    The first thing I wanna do is jump up and defend the guy–being that I too am a Chaplin fan. But…
    ..
    ….c’mon, yeah, he did sort of have a thing for the young things. The really, REALLY young things!

    We’re so silly to immediately illuminate the “gold digging” gals as soon as a harsh word is raised to dear Mr. Chaplin. It is what it is. He was older, he “should have known better”, but really, he learned his lesson, didn’t he? His attraction was natural to his own disordered and strange self, as it was for the girls who fell for him. Daddy issues abound!
    Oona was an adult when they were married, and he was, for all accounts, a happily marrried man till his death. That sort of redeems the guy don’t it?

    By the way, if I were 16 and Charlie Chaplin’ came a knockin at my door, you’d have to physically restrain me. That requires saying.. That man was so charming, even when he was an asshole, who didn’t adore him? He could have his pick.

    He kind of liked to run the show, ya know?

  • nadia greene said

    i don’t care what he did, he was a sweet man trying to make everybody else happy all the time. if i was born in those days i would have fucked him too. no matter how old i was or he. i am a true fan of him and i don’t like it would people talk bad about him. people overlook at how talented he was and how he made people laugh and forget about their problemss when i watch him on the computer and television i am happy the whole day! I LOVE U CHARLIE!

  • Kat said

    You state that in the film Monsieur Verdoux that Chaplin was a serial killer of ‘old coots.’ What the hell did that make him? He was well into his sixties when he did the film. Did that make him a young buck? While there is no doubt that he was a genius on many levels, Chaplin exploited women. He was a pedophile who preyed on underage kids decades younger than him. Meanwhile, he mocked older women in his films, such as Verdoux, The Great Dictator, Limelight, A King in New York, and Modern Times. He used women, young and old, to his own ends, as long as he got off or got a laugh out of his viewership. This is what art and ‘greatness’ is in a patriarchy, however. While I don’t deny the man was a good filmmaker, I’ve lost a lot of respect for him due to this and have gotten a bad taste in my mouth for the films of his I used to like. I’m surprised he didn’t dump Oona for a 14 year old after she aged a little. I’m not being harsh, I’m telling it like it is whether ppl like it or not.