Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world
RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

The Dark Knight Review

Paul Moore
By Paul Moore posted 2 months ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon

Maybe you’re somebody who has no qualms when hundreds of millions of dollars are spent on a movie that amounts to a couple great chase scenes and a rock ‘em, sock ‘em fight with the hero’s girlfriend tied to some time-sensitive death contraption. But I always feel teased. Like I just got back from a date where my interest was exploited for a free meal. The Dark Knight is a diamond in a mound of cubic-zirconia gemstones, two and a half hours of blockbuster at it’s finest, a movie worth the price of a concert ticket.

Please, allow me to clear my head of my immediate reactions: The Dark Knight is the shit! It is so awesome I can not stare into the light of its awesomeness without seeing spots. Better than I hoped–and I was hoping for a lot–there were even points where I sat looking at the screen thinking, “Can Christopher Nolan (writer/director) possibly sustain my amazement any further?” The answer: Yeppers, and with a choke-on-its-way-down ending. I’ll shut off the blathering even though I want to keep going.

Christopher Nolan does what I wanted Jon Favreau to do with Iron Man. Kick ass and kick more ass while always staying a step ahead of me (Heath Ledger as The Joker is as mystifying and sensual as Hannibal Lecter). Then–so I don’t feel he just took my money for a couple great chase scenes–he knocks me in the head. When I walked out of the theater I couldn’t balance out the world. I laid awake in bed rethinking the Iraq war based on something a guy in a bat costume said, and that’s when I knew I’d gotten my money’s worth.

Tonally, The Dark Knight picks up right where Batman Begins left off. The soft, sour notes in the concluding refrain of Batman Begins have grown in volume. The closing of the first movie suggests that donning a cape and mask to inspire fear in the ruthless and hope in the innocent has, in fact, unlocked the frenzied fantasies of Gotham’s sociopaths, which crescendos in the opening bank heist of Dark Knight. Heath Ledger’s Joker is so exceptionally twisted and brilliant, I can imagine casting agents boycotting future assignments to cast comic book villains. He’s a sociopath, a terrorist and he’s totally magnetic. If The Joker weren’t killing people, he’d make the perfect role model: Resolute, determined, brimming with self-confidence and unshaken by the material things of this world. He’d be a monk on his way to sainthood, if only he didn’t live to see the world suffer.

There is no effort to explain where The Joker comes from, except for his own self-made mythology which changes whenever he tells it. Nolan won’t offer false comfort in “understanding” where The Joker comes from, but just the reality that some evil cannot be explained and must be faced. Gary Oldman returns as James Gordon (minus the befuddled old man in the Batmobile antics, thank god). And Maggie Gyllenhaal has replaced Katie Holmes as district attorney Rachel Dawes (again, god, thanks). Aaron Eckhart takes a prominent role as “The White Knight,” D.A. Harvey Dent, a surprisingly worthy double for Batman/Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale). Harvey Dent and The Joker orbit Batman like protons and electrons vying to change the very molecular makeup of our hero, and they do.

Take all the brilliant action of the first movie and give it the psychological sparring up there with Anton Chigurh and Sheriff Bell in No Country for Old Men. It’s an art film with comic book heroes to geek out on. Ah, how refreshing for the hero to be challenged so far beyond his nemesis having a bigger, better contraption! The Joker is a spirit, a moral contaminant awakening uncomfortable admiration and shame over our silly values. He’s the most compelling defense for water boarding. Like a walking Sophie’s Choice, his sole purpose is to strip away any pretense of nobility and reveal what humans are truly capable of when only given the choice to kill or be killed. He’s Batman’s true nemesis because he preys not on Batman’s body, but the very hope he has in his city and the people in it. For us, he’s the enemy we won’t let ourselves believe in.

I’m still thinking about it.

Add your comments

  • Fallingstar said

    All great movies have highly central spiritual themes,
    and this movie certainly has not disappointed,
    the most central and pervasive theme that I found
    in my initial viewing was well portrayed in the figure of
    the White Knight , whose face was half burned off seemingly as
    a potent symbol of the unquenchable power of the flames of
    sedition (see footnote), and who was regardless remembered with
    kindness and mercy by his friends upon his death.
    This is a very good analogy for the plight of many people
    today, as many of us, due to our environment and lack of
    education no longer have eyes to see, nor ear to hear the
    spiritual melodies and beauty of the well beloved of the world,
    and this when it is when they are so abundant around us.
    Every person and their creation is a reflection of the divine,
    there is as much to be learned from the villans as the heros.
    If we are to be just to one another we must strive
    to be obedient to the councils of those stainless and
    luminous beings who manifest their teachings to us in
    mysterious ways, such as in very good movies. This is one
    small contribution to bringing back an awarness of the
    beauty of the Well Beloved, Happy viewing…

    “Liberty must, in the end, lead to sedition,
    whose flames none can quench.”

    (Baha’u'llah, Gleanings from the Writings of Baha’u'llah, p. 335)

  • futurefree said

    Nice try, “Fallingstar,” but I know Harry Knowles when I hear him! As usual it was the Baha’u'llah quote that gave you away, you sneaky man!

  • Main_Street_Avenger said

    Outside of the usual entertainment media, the consensus from the general public is that this movie is a plotless, terribly acted rip-off waste of money and 3 hours of your viewing life, so that tells me I should keep hold of my cash and wait for something else better to come along. No contest.

  • John Machado said

    SPOILER ALERT

    I wanted to add a bit to your TDK discussion on the podcast. I was right there with you when you started to discuss parallels with recent events of Iraq, terrorism, torture, spying, GW Bush, etc. I also felt uncomfortable with the idea that some would see this as support for the illegal and unconstitutional choices made my the American administration under the guise of “protecting” us. But then in the final act the film flips this over and rejects this way of thinking. But your review stops before you reach these important points. In the end we are offered choices. A choice between concluding that when dealing with terrorists you must act like a terrorist or realizing that rejecting this false choice is really the only way to beat terrorism. Terrorism wants to create just that, terror. If we become afraid and sacrifice the values (society, stability, rule of law, etc.) that the terrorists want to destroy, then what have we really gained? The first choice was the final choice made by Harvey Dent (Two Face). He became the evil he was trying to fight. Now the choice to reject the thinking of the terrorists and preserve civilization is embodied in the two boats on the harbor that are wired to explode. These civilians are given the option to possibly save themselves by giving into their fear of the unknown (the people on the other boat or the Joker) by killing others (in essence doing the bidding of the terrorist). In the end the choice to preserve civilization and reject the chaos and fear wins out, even if it means that there may be a higher chance of you or a loved one dying (people on boat or Rachel in the case of Bruce). In the end Batman also sides with civilization rather than Two Face and the Joker. He does not kill the Joker and the spying equipment is destroyed. [On a side note, I think there could also be an anti capital punishment thread here. On the boats there is the debate with the civilians over whether to sacrifice the criminals on the other boat in order to save themselves (society). In the end the civilians realize they would also be murderers and again no better than what they feared (criminals, terrorists, etc.). Even the criminals realized that killing an entire boat of innocent people because you are afraid was wrong (ie. bombing civilian populations in Iraq because someone said there might be WMDs in the country). This is once again paralleled by Batman not killing the criminal (Joker), even though the criminal killed those close to him.] Well that was longer than expected, but I felt that these were important “lessons” from the film that could be added to your original discussion.

    I enjoy listening to your podcast. Best, John

  • TV Comics said

    SPOILER ALERT: I had a really hard time feeling any emotion for Rachael when she died. I felt like I didn’t care about her character at all.

  • The PHA : links for 2008-07-16 said

    [...] The Dark Knight Review | SpoutBlog It’s unbelieveable how awesome The Dark Knight sounds right now. [...]