
Though I first buzzed about an Academy Award nomination for Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight more than a month before his death, I now want to take it all back. I feel all the talk of Ledger’s posthumous Oscar chances will cloud my mind when I finally do see it, and it will probably also cloud the Academy’s judgment, too. Six months from now, when the nominations are announced on January 22 (coincidentally the one-year anniversary of Ledger’s death), if Ledger is not recognized for his role as The Joker, there will surely be an uproar — actually, Hollywood might just up and self-implode.
I’m not the only one annoyed by all the Oscar buzz. Terry Gilliam, who directed Ledger in The Brothers Grimm and the upcoming The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, is calling “bullshit” on the whole thing, particularly against Warner Bros., which Gilliam accuses of exploiting Ledger’s death and chance of a posthumous Oscar for publicity purposes. Considering most Oscar campaigns for live actors are really just part of movie marketing, he has a good point.
Sure, I would love to see Ledger honored. I’ve believed in his Oscar worth since 10 Things I Hate About You . But in February, if he receives a posthumous award, it will surely feel, at least in good percentage, that it’s because he died young. In that case, why not also give supporting noms sight unseen to Rob Knox for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and Brad Renfro for The Informers? Despite the more than 10 posthumous nominations in Oscar history, however, it’s not obligatory for the Academy to hand out such accolades every time someone dies before his final movie is released. Just check out the following list of talent who probably deserved posthumous Oscar recognition as much as Ledger does:
- Jean Vigo for L’Atalante - One of the greatest, most influential films of all time, L’Atalante premiered in France in 1934, a few months before Vigo died of tuberculosis at the age of 29. It eventually made its way to the U.S. 14 years later, just in time for the debut of the Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film. And considering the first recipient, Vittorio De Sica (for Shoeshine), would win again two years later (for Bicycle Thieves), the Academy should have recognized Vigo’s film, even if it was more than a decade old. Unfortunately, it would be many decades before L’Atalante received the kind of esteem it deserves.
- James Dean for Rebel Without a Cause - Dean starred in only three feature films, one of which, East of Eden, was released prior to his death. He received posthumous Oscar nominations for that film and his final appearance in Giant, which came out a year later. But wouldn’t it have been wonderful if he’d also been nominated for his most iconic role in Rebel Without a Cause? Sure, he’d have posthumously gone up against himself in 1956, but that’s what movie gods like him were made to do.
- Richard Harris for Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets - Not only should Harris have received a nomination, he should have won, too. It doesn’t matter that it wasn’t the greatest performance by the actor, who’d previously been nominated for 1963’s This Sporting Life and 1990’s The Field. It’s that Harry Potter fans would have tuned in and saved that year’s telecast from being the least-watched in years. Just imagine how many people will be tuning in to next year’s show just because of the (inevitable) Ledger nom.
- Heather O’Rourke for Poltergeist III - I know that I’m only one of maybe three people who like the third Poltergeist movie, but even if you think the movie itself is bad, you have to give little Heather O’Rourke credit for giving creepily terrific performances throughout the series. Compare her talent to some other young actresses who’ve been nominated. Especially Abigail Breslin of Little Miss Sunshine. And had she lived, she’d probably be a better actress today than Oscar-winner Anna Paquin.
- F.W. Murnau for Tabu - His Sunrise was pretty successful a few year earlier at the 1st Academy Awards, but he wasn’t even nominated. In fact, the man who also gave us Nosferatu, Faust and The Last Laugh was never nominated for an Oscar, a fact that might have been different had the Oscars been founded a decade earlier or had he not died tragically in a car accident at age 43. I’m sure, at least, that Floyd Crosby, when winning for his cinematography work on Tabu, raised the statue to the sky and said, “this is for Murnau.”
- Peter Sellers for The Fiendish Plot of Dr. Fu Manchu - Whether or not you believe the Academy hates on comedic actors, you should agree that Sellers should have won an Oscar before he died. Or after he died. If he’d been nominated for this critical and commercial failure, though, it would of course have been one of those “he deserved it for ______, but this will do” kind of situtations.
- Stanley Kubrick for Eyes Wide Shut - If Scorsese can finally win with The Departed, Kubrick should have finally won posthumously with what is often thought of as his worst film. If anything, he at least deserved to be nominated instead of M. Night Shyamalan.
- Adrienne Shelly for Waitress - Didn’t it seem like a sure thing that writer-director-actress would get the nomination this year? Considering Diablo Cody had already (unofficially) won the actual Oscar before the nominations were even announced, could it have hurt to include the tragically murdered Shelley? Or were there already too many ladies on the screenwriting ballot this year?
- Thelma Ritter for What’s So Bad About Feeling Good? - If ever there was a supporting actress who should have won an Oscar, Ritter was she. After six nominations (four of them consecutive), a posthumous seventh should have come with this movie (even if I’ve never personally seen it, I bet she’s great as usual). Unfortunately, the ballots were likely already in when she had her heart attack in February 1969. Also, she probably would have lost to Ruth Gordon anyway.
- Brandon Lee for The Crow - Laugh all you want, but in a crazy year that saw John Travolta recognized with a nomination and Tom Hanks recognized with a win for one of his silliest performances ever, would it have been so strange if the Academy had given Lee the slot filled by Morgan Freeman (obviously Oscar had little love for The Shawshank Redemption as it was)?
Here is the truth, the movie is good and everyone should go see it (i get more money for it too) This roll is and was Heaths BEST preformance ever saddly he WILL be nominated due to a sympathy vote, it was good possibly great just NOT OSCAR GREAT, I hate to say that about a film i worked on but if an oscar is bestowed due to guilt of a young tallented actors tragic death it will just be an insult!, It sounds mean but it wasnt that good, it was good just not that good
That is the worst list i have ever seen, are you talking about the merit of the preformance or just a sympathy nomination or win ? In either case your biased list is ridiculous
I make a habit of always being positive on my site for the most part, and in my critiques of fellow online writers. If I have something bad to say, I just ignore the piece altogether. But, Chris, your above list is indeed one of the worst online pieces I’ve ever read: badly researched, ill-informed, and poorly reasoned. I have to hit it point by point.
1) Vigo for L’Atalante? Okay. You arguably start off good, though I would have researched whether the Academy rules back then permitted a film to be awarded a Best Foreign Film Special Oscar 14 years after its release. But a great movie, you’re right. Where I have a complaint here, though, is with your opinion that “considering the first recipient, Vittorio De Sica (for Shoeshine), would win again two years later (for Bicycle Thieves), the Academy should have recognized Vigo’s film.” How can you hold that against the Academy? This would presuppose they had some magical future-vision machine that would tell them that De Sica was going to win anyway in 2 years, so, hey, let’s throw a bone to Vigo? Whhhhhaaa? Oh, and, by the way, the movie is called The Bicycle Thief.
Adrianne Shelley’s Waitress was a charming movie, but Oscar material? Mmmm, not really. And, what, the Academy is paying tribute to her career as an actress. Not to take anything away from her fine acting, but I’d doubt most
2) Of course, as you point out, James Dean did get a posthumous nomination in ’55 for East of Eden. But if you had researched your Academy rules, you’d realize that, movie god or not, Dean and every other actor has no chance of competing against themselves because there’s a rule against it. Has never happened, and never will.
3) You wanted to GIVE the award to Richard Harris for a nothing role simply to appease the Harry Potter fans and make them tune in to an awards show the otherwise couldn’t give two shits about? This is piss-poor logic.
4) Heather O’Rourke for Poltergeist III? Are you kidding me?! NEXT…
5) I get the impression that you haven’t even seen Murnau’s Tabu (hell, I haven’t even seen it, and I’ve seen 30,000 movies), because you don’t even talk about its merits as a film. You just like other Murnau movies, so you picked this one somehow out of a hat because, I suppose, it made you sound like you knew what you were talking about.
6) PETER SELLERS FOR FU MANCHU???? That thing is an embarrassment to
Sellers’ memory!!! It would have been better if you’d proposed nominating his 1979 Being There performance again in 1980, in a precident-setting move by the Academy voters! God, I know you gotta be kidding now…
7) Finally: a choice that makes sense. 1999 was an incredibly great movie year, filled with Best Director possibilities. But, yes, Kubrick deserved a nomination both as tribute and as recognition of a great directorial effort. Good job.
Academy voters have ever even seen a Hal Hartley movie. They’d be giving her
the Oscar basically for dying in a horribly tragic way. Ugh. Again, bad logic.
9) This one is amazing. You come right out and say you’ve never seen Thelma
Ritter in What’s So Bad About Feeling Good?, but you’re proposing she win a
nomination anyway? And then you even shoot it down by saying she died at the wrong time to even be considered. Now you’re just wasting the reader’s time.
10) Again, you GOTTA be kidding! The only reason The Crow has even made a dent in pop culture is because Brandon Lee died in an on-set accident, and people think that’s creepy somehow. Man, come on.
Again, I don’t like to be negative. This is the first post of this sort I’ve ever written. I dig that you’re so excited about movies that you want to write about them online (I don’t even know if you’re getting paid for your stuff or not). But what you’re doing with posts like this, Christopher, is (a) misinforming people looking to you for good info and detailed, well-backed opinions, (b) misdirecting people to poor movies that you, personally, just have some sort of thing for (and a thing that not even well-explained), and (c) generally bringing down the status of online criticism—just lowering the bar a little more so that other misinformed “critics” can hop right over it.
Go read some books, study you craft, and in the meantime, write detailed, evocative stuff about something you know and know well. And, man, get some taste.
Dean Treadway
Filmicability.blogspot.com