Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

Batman Fans Threaten Detractors

Karina Longworth
By Karina Longworth posted 1 year ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Two weeks ago, David Edelstein attracted ridiculously outsized ire from the fanboy community for daring to do his job––ie, give his considered opinion on the cinematic value of The Dark Knight. Still, even the most vocal critics of Edelstein’s criticism didn’t really do anything more hostile than declare his review to be “bullshit.”

But other critics who reviewed the latest Batman film less than positively aren’t getting off so easily.

Today Filmbrain takes a look at the increasingly hostile, threatening comments that have stacked up on the negative Knight reviews published by two of his friends (and mine), Jurgen Fauth and Keith Uhlich:

Neither of their reviews was intended to provoke, nor were they playing the contrarian — they simply didn’t like the film. As of this writing there are 938 comments in response to these reviews. (Both at their sites as well as their links on Rotten Tomatoes.) Some go no deeper than Fag!; some are actually amusing - Keep your head in Little Women and Suffrage texts you pansy, but others are downright ugly.

He then excerpts from a comment on Keith’s review, which begins, “You know, some people have been so enraged by your little opinion piece that they want you to kill yourself. Please DON’T!!! You know why, because I am going to have so much fun killing you myself!” It gets worse from there.

Ultimately, Filmbrain concludes that such reactions stem from the fact that “The Dark Knight has become a religion, an opiate, and an ethos. It’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra for the post-literate set.”

If it’s a “religion,” then it’s a faith based on psychotic delusion. This is really amazing to me, this idea that the audience can become so obsessed with a film that they’ll actually rise up en masse to physically threaten anyone who dares speak negatively about it. I guess it’s the best, cheapest marketing Warners could hope for––detractors are silenced, and they don’t even have to lift a finger. Which is, you know…pretty gross.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • Mike Everleth said

    Wow. I don’t know who I’d feel more afraid of my life around: A group of fans waiting outside a repeat screening of The Dark Knight or a group of picketers outside an abortion clinic.

  • Sujewa said

    Young boys who get incredibly excited about a man in a
    tight plastic suit getting deeply involved with a man
    wearing make up AND then get incredibly upset when a
    film reviewer does not like a COMIC BOOK MOVIE
    are idiots. Hopefully they will make & post
    some “don’t pick on my hero Batman” videos on
    myspace or facebook & we’ll be able to
    laugh at them for decades.

    - Sujewa

  • Craig Kennedy said

    I understand now how people who didn’t like No Country For Old Men that much last year felt.

  • Mike said

    Wow, those guys need to lay off the koolaid, or whatever sugary product is making them so mental.

    That said, why the swipe at Warners, as though they’d be glad that fans are making death threats? It’s kind of a cheap conclusion to a post that already had its villains.

  • Scott said

    Give it another couple of months and those creepy fanboy kids will have moved on to something else…hopefully.

  • Clay Liford said

    Is it just me, or is DARK KNIGHT the one film that doesn’t need anyone coming to its defense? I mean with a bajillion positive reviews, what’s actual damage can a few naysayers actually do? What, maybe TWO people who would have normally paid to see it won’t now? I mean how much money does this film freakin’ need? Come on, I mean let’s get creative and defend The Love Guru! Now that’s fighting the good fight.

  • Aidan said

    It is really disappointing to see fanboys channeling their energy into attacking the film’s detractors rather than something more positive.

    The role of a critic is to say it how he or she sees a work, not to pander to the audience. If a critic does not enjoy a piece then they should not be discouraged from saying so, no matter how big the film is.

    There are sadly some people out there who seem to believe that you can be as hurtful or rude as you like on the internet because their victim cannot identify them.

  • James M. Johnston said

    This is the only real comparison to W that holds any water.

  • k said

    This is the internet, where no one takes responsibility for what they say. Those asshats aren’t really that passionate about the movie. They’re just a bit desensitized and usually go to extremes to get the point across.