
Yesterday saw the launch of iArthouse, a download-to-burn service offering a large selection of foreign films. According to Scott Kirsner, the site is an outgrowth of an existing service that I’ve never heard of called EZ Takes––Scott calls it “a rebranding of EZTakes.com without some of the schlockier stuff — no ‘Extreme Sports’ category, for instance, and no Troma movies like Toxic Avenger.” Not that it’s all trophy class from here on out––Currently promoted on the front page of iArthouse: Roberto Benigni’s much-maligned The Tiger and the Snow. Scott goes on to note that EZTakes’ traffic currently falls far short of iArthouse’s logical competitor, Jaman.com, although metrics for actual downloads on these kinds of sites are hard to come by.
Meanwhile, in news that’s so related as to seem ironic: today comes the news that both Starz!-owned Vongo and Morgan Freeman-owned ClickStar are shutting down.
Vongo had big studio titles, but its profile never matched that of iTunes; Starz! will license its library for download through third parties, with Verizon being the first. Meanwhile, ClickStar’s stated mission of bringing indie-arm-ish releases (Brad Silberling’s 10 Items of Less, the John Travolta/Salma Hayek vehicle Lonely Hearts) to the download realm shortly after their traditional exhibition premiere failed, in large part because theater owners are still hesitant to book anything that’s going to be available in homes within a matter of weeks.
So with EZTakes looking to “indiefy” at the same time that download sites with higher star power are shutting down, is this evidence that highbrow content is in higher demand than “schlockier stuff” when it comes to downloads? Maybe. It does seem clear that while Jaman seems to be doing surprisingly well trafficking in festival films and classics (right now Teeth and the original The Italian Job are being promoted on the front page of site, which is ranked just inside Alexa’s Top 5,000 sites on the web), and iTunes––which of course benefits from being the top name brand in s selling 50,000 downloads a day (mostly of high-profile new releases like 21 and Harold and Kumar), the sites trying to hit the middle of the market are not having much luck.
Digital rights management (DRM) is a generic term that refers to access control technologies used by hardware manufacturers, publishers and copyright holders to limit usage of digital media or devices. DRM is controversial and rightfully so, as consumers avoid it wherever and whenever it crops up.
Ez-takes and its constant insistance on DRM, is more of a hindrance for any filmmaker and producer. The people who would use download features are realistically not there: they download from p2p sites anyways. DRM does not actually exist, because any content can be downgraded to analog and then digitzed again; thus ez-takes’ claims of DRM are misleading, if mot false.
For independent producers other and better options such as filmbay ,brosmedia and xing are available. Their networking and distribution features are well beyond the standard fare, suggesting a web 3.0 notion. Indy producers need useful tools. Time will tell how things will pan out, but at least there are some good choices out there.
Dave Wakefield