<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video Essay: Greenaway + Darman + Duran Duran = Thatcher-era Britain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2008/08/18/video-essay-greenaway-darman-duran-duran-thatcher-era-britain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/08/18/video-essay-greenaway-darman-duran-duran-thatcher-era-britain/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/08/18/video-essay-greenaway-darman-duran-duran-thatcher-era-britain/#comment-111162</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=3892#comment-111162</guid>
		<description>OK that is very true - in retrospect, when you have what the Derek Jarman video for It's a Sin does in 4 minutes, you don't need an hour of Greenaway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK that is very true - in retrospect, when you have what the Derek Jarman video for It&#8217;s a Sin does in 4 minutes, you don&#8217;t need an hour of Greenaway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karina Longworth</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/08/18/video-essay-greenaway-darman-duran-duran-thatcher-era-britain/#comment-111018</link>
		<dc:creator>Karina Longworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=3892#comment-111018</guid>
		<description>Charlie, one of the points I made that got cut out of the video was that Jarman didn't necessarily lead to Greenaway, but that the aesthetics of something like Jubilee were seeping into more general pop culture by 82. This video was edited down from an hour long conversation, and while I think my basic point comes across, some of the finer details had to be cut for time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie, one of the points I made that got cut out of the video was that Jarman didn&#8217;t necessarily lead to Greenaway, but that the aesthetics of something like Jubilee were seeping into more general pop culture by 82. This video was edited down from an hour long conversation, and while I think my basic point comes across, some of the finer details had to be cut for time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/08/18/video-essay-greenaway-darman-duran-duran-thatcher-era-britain/#comment-111011</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=3892#comment-111011</guid>
		<description>But but but Jubilee came out in 77 and was hence pre-Thatcher, so it's jaunty-apocalypso mood suited the times of terrified cheekyness and light-hearted/wry wisdom on a decaying Britain. Draughtsman's Contract is from 82, and so completely of Thatcher, which explains its attempt to make something glossy, escapist and a cry for cheekyness in a very serious very dangerous Britian. I think they are both totally of their time, but not comparable - 77 and 82 are like decades apart in British society. You wanna compare Greenaway and Jarman on Thatcher, you need The Last of England - now THAT is a way to respond to the depression of Thatcher with seriousness, which I guess is what you're wanting.

Really great video though, i enjoyed it lots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But but but Jubilee came out in 77 and was hence pre-Thatcher, so it&#8217;s jaunty-apocalypso mood suited the times of terrified cheekyness and light-hearted/wry wisdom on a decaying Britain. Draughtsman&#8217;s Contract is from 82, and so completely of Thatcher, which explains its attempt to make something glossy, escapist and a cry for cheekyness in a very serious very dangerous Britian. I think they are both totally of their time, but not comparable - 77 and 82 are like decades apart in British society. You wanna compare Greenaway and Jarman on Thatcher, you need The Last of England - now THAT is a way to respond to the depression of Thatcher with seriousness, which I guess is what you&#8217;re wanting.</p>
<p>Really great video though, i enjoyed it lots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
