A man on his phone next to me at the concessions said, “Things have definitely taken a turn for me, today. I’m now four feet away from Salman Rushdie.” In an unusual act of altruism only found at Telluride, author Salman Rushdie has championed the small Indian movie, Firaaq. He is introducing the screenings with the first-time director and acclaimed actress Nandita Das, and he’s conducting the Q&A afterward. This, of course, is helping an unknown movie with no big stars draw a crowd.
Firaaq (translated: Separation) takes place in the immediate aftermath of the 2002 Gujarat riots, where as many as 2,000 people–mostly Muslim–were killed. The riots were a hindu backlash to the Godhra train burning where Muslims were accused of burning up a car with 58 Hindu pilgrims inside. Made with an ensemble cast and intersecting storylines, it’s a day in the life of would be neighbors right after the riots are over, the anger and fear still dense in the air.
There’s a rickshaw driver whose house was burned down, his wife who suspects her Hindu friend did it, a gravedigger wanting revenge, a Muslim priest whose remained oblivious to the conflict outside, a secular shopkeeper married to a Hindu wife and another Hindu woman married to a man who was a perpetrator in the riots. Their lives loosely intersect to reveal they could be a community but for an age old hatred made fresh by the killing, raping and burning of the last month.
A frequent pitfall of movies made this way is that the stories are only skimmed lightly and characters are forced to say exactly what they’re thinking (Crash) because they have to get out of the way for another storyline. Firaaq, at times, is didactic, but where it wins is in delivering on concept.
A little discussed fact of massive violence is that it’s not over when the fighting stops. It’s just smoldering like a volcano returning to dormancy after an eruption. There’s a haze of fear and loathing still thick in the community. It happened with Jews who survived the camps trying to return home after WWII only to find they weren’t anymore wanted then they were during the war. The enduring displacement was maybe the biggest reason for establishing Israel, which shifted the war to a smoldering tension, and occasional eruption, with Palestine. It’s the same five years after the Gujarat riots between hindu and muslim Indians.
If Salman Rushdie is any indication, I think the movie will be well received. There’s a reality that many of us will be oblivious to human suffering happening around the world unless it’s in a movie. Which is why filmmakers continually turn to movies to connect political action with human emotion and why, on some level, it continually works.
The movie begins with a fantastic start hitting the emotions hard and make you touch 2002, however as the movie goes on it looses its dept to connect the viewers to the suffering of people. The movie shows the muslims as victims and Hindu’s as culprit instead of showing that irrespective who ever was the culprit the common man suffered. The movie has a brilliant cast and they acted as usual amazingly however the short movies had weak links and didnt bring the dept out. Over all dissapointed with the direction. Nandita Das should stick to acting and not story writing or direction.
It has become trend sorts to show muslims as victims and hindus as culprits. Same happenned in Slumdog. I am terribly upset that no one is reacting. Can anyone imagine what could have happenned if the victim and culprti religions are reversed? Even the shooting would not have been possible. People are taking it for granted that Hindus are peace loving people. More improtantly everyone is scared of Muslims because we never know how easily each of them is connected to terrorists.
Firaaq does not mean seperation. It means quest!
Friends… the first scene tells everyting… It tries to convey that BJP (Red truck with lotus on front) killed muslims in Gujarat… looks like a Communist/Congress sponsored movie right before the election… Congratulations Nandita