Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post
Could BLINDNESS Really Happen? Five Doomsday Movies Ranked by Likelihood

Could BLINDNESS Really Happen? Five Doomsday Movies Ranked by Likelihood

Kevin Buist
By Kevin Buist posted 1 year ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Bailout talks implode, leaving economy’s fate unresolvedChavez reaffirms Russia alliance during visit, Pirates seize ship carrying tanks, ammo. Just click over to CNN.com or any other news site and you’ll see why post-apocalyptic and doomsday movies seem more relevant than ever. 

The doomsday scenarios in movies can be pretty outlandish, but some of them are actually plausible. After all, in world where pirates have tanks, Hollywood doesn’t need to stray far from reality for a good yarn.

Below the jump, we put five doomsday movie scenarios to the plausibility test. If you’ve always secretly thought Waterworld was a work of dead-on global warming prophecy, read on.

5. Waterworld

The doomsday scenario:

Global warming causes the complete melt of glaciers and polar ice caps, flooding nearly the entire planet.

Could it really happen?

No. Make no mistake, rising sea levels due to climate change are very likely to cause major problems in the the next century, but a near-total covering of the world in water is not possible. While the melting polar ice caps are destroying the habitat of the polar bear, it’s important to remember that most of the Northern ice cap is already floating in the ocean, so its contribution to sea level rise will not be as severe as Greenland or Antarctica. And even if all the ice melted off of those two land masses, the collective sea level rise would be about 67 meters, or 220 feet. That’s very bad news if you live in Amsterdam or New Orleans, but it’s certainly not enough to cover all but the highest mountains, as in the film. We also shouldn’t expect those chucks of ice to melt too fast. It will likely take a thousand years or more for them to be gone completely, so we’ll have plenty of time to hoard paper and build cool boats, or just move to Denver.

4. The Terminator/The Matrix (Separate films, similar problem)

The doomsday scenario:

Computers converge into one super intelligence, hell-bent on destroying the useless parasite known as humanity.

Could it really happen?

Probably not. In the 1980’s Vernor Vinge popularized the theory of a technological singularity. The basic idea is that computers will eventually become smart enough to think for themselves, and therefore make even smarter computers. Those computers would then make even smarter computers, and so on until the exponential growth of artificial intelligence goes far beyond human comprehension. At this point, as in The Terminator and The Matrix films, the machines would realize they no longer need humanity and seek to eliminate it. Most credible scientists doubt Vinge’s hypothesis. While it’s easy to imagine the exponential growth of computing power, as Moore’s Law does, it’s a big jump to assume that such increased power will lead to the creative thinking that would be required for self-improvement.

So that’s the good news, the bad news is that if the singularity did want to destroy humanity, it wouldn’t be nearly so merciful as the machines in The Terminator and The Matrix. I’m sure it wouldn’t take long for the super intelligence to master the fields of biology and nanotechnology, at which point it would engineer a super virus that would wipe out humanity in a mater of minutes. Is it really a smart use of robot-overlord resources to send mechanized assassins back in time or dispatch swarms of tentacled machines into abandoned sewer tunnels? Sure, biological warfare seems like cheating in human-on-human conflict, but I doubt the machines would be so forgiving.

3. Blindness

The doomsday scenario:

The entire population except for one woman goes blind almost instantly. Mass hysteria breaks out, quarantines are ineffective, the strong and brutal hoard food and commit atrocities.

Could it really happen?

Maybe. There is a form of infectious blindness, caused by the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis. It’s usually passed physically, through towels or by touching an infected person’s eyes. It’s most common among children in poor areas where hygiene is lacking. The up side is that it takes a while, unlike the mysterious plague in Blindness. The down side is that blindness caused by trachoma is extremely painful, as the eyelids turn inwards, scratching the surface of the eye to the point where it’s no longer transparent. In its current state, Chlamydia trachomatis could not cause instant mass blindness, but if by some fluke the bacteria became exponentially more contagious, we could be in for a dark future.

2. Children of Men

The doomsday scenario:

Mass infertility. In the film the cause is unknown. Not only are women unable to get pregnant, pregnancies in progress also fail when the mysterious event occurs.

Could it really happen?

Maybe. In the landmark 1995 book Our Stolen Future, the authors examine how chemical pollutants effect reproductive health. In short, there are an increasing number of chemicals floating around that mimic hormones. These have been shown to cause all sorts of problems including reduced puberty age, fetal defects, and reduced sperm counts. The kicker is that many of these chemicals are extremely persistent, meaning that they do not break down. So even if the junk leaching out of your Nalgene bottle is very slight, it will join the other hormone disruptors lodged in your fat cells until they gather enough friends to do some real damage, even if it takes several generations. This differs from the film in that it’s likely to be far more gradual. A steady decline in global sperm count wouldn’t effect pregnancies in progress, and we’d see it coming.

1. Armageddon

The doomsday scenario:

A huge asteroid strikes Earth, wiping out every living thing.

Could it really happen?

Yes. It nearly happened 65 million years ago, causing the extinction of most dinosaur species, and it could happen again. More recently, a meteor or comet exploded over a remote region of Siberia in 1908, detonating with the force of 1,000 Hiroshima bombs, knocking over trees in an 830 square mile area, and on the scheme of things, that was a small one. The US government and the UN have recently begun to take the threat of asteroid collision more seriously, but that doesn’t mean we’re prepared. Many experts put this scenario at the top of their list of likely causes of human extinction. There have been several near-misses, some quite recently. As far as we know, the rock that most likely has our name on it is (29075) 1950 DA, which could spin through space in one of two ways: if it picks door number 1, it will miss us by millions of miles, if it picks door number 2, it will have a 1 in 300 chance of ruining everyones’ day. Luckily, that day won’t come until March 16, 2880.

In the meantime, we can work out a reliable way to either destroy the asteroid, as they did in Armageddon, or alter its course and eliminate the threat. The latter solution is looking more reasonable at the moment, but it’s no surprise Michael Bay preferred interstellar nuclear weapons to a film about altering an asteroid’s course by a fraction of a degree using the gravitational pull of an unmanned spacecraft. The really scary part, however, is that while about 800 near-Earth objects larger than 1 km across (the really bad ones) have been accounted for, many estimate that about 200 have yet to be found. Let’s just hope they find the one heading for us in time to get Bruce Willis and his team from their offshore oil rig and into a nuke-laden space shuttle.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • Shane said

    Without zombies, your entire premise is faulty. Please begin again.

  • joe said

    If I had to pick a way to go it would have to be a tossup between being killed by the governator or blasted away by a comet. Either way is quick and easy, beats the heck outa running around being blind, waiting to fall off a cliff or something.

  • your mother said

    uhhh.h..did everyone forget about 28 days later?!?!

    That IS the most likely to happen. What if AIDS takes a rabid turn or something making all infected ZOMBIES!?

    HUH!? WTF ARE YOU GONNA DO THEN!?!?!?!? Armageddon, pfffft…

  • Jiff Jones said

    Personally, I think anyone who doesnt believe it can happen is an idiot.

    Jiff
    http://www.privacy-center.ru.tc

  • andy said

    When the evolutionary process makes us all gay….it’s over.

  • Jack said

    I would like to live in a water world, so I could piss into a Mr. Coffee and get Taster’s Choice. (Dana Carvey)

  • WGwinn said

    As for waterworld; there have been plans proposed to blunt global warming by dropping chinks of ice comets into orbit as freshwater supplies and solar absorber/reflectors. I know of at least one story based on them messing up the insertion math AND rushing the schedule, so that 50 years worth ice chunks were all inbound on the same collision orbits. While i haven’t done the math, It could well cause a waterworld like disaster.

  • Mad scientist said

    What about the “12 monkeys” doomsday scenario, with the mad scientist wiping out the humanity to reset nature, that could happen.. I thinx. Not some dude travelling back through time and all that.. But i always kind of liked the idea in that movie..

  • Bob Evans said

    Effect and Affect are two different things.

    Affect: to act on; produce an effect or change in: Cold weather affected the crops.

    Effect: result; consequence:

  • By Crom said

    google this: No Blade of Grass!!!

  • Dystopia said

    We don’t really have to die, we just have to have some event that absolutely prevents any and all progress from being made.

    The likeliest of these scenarios today would be

    The Handmaid’s Tale (book) by Margaret Atwood, followed by
    THX-1138
    1984 (stereotypical I know).

    In terms of us all dying off?

    28 Days Later
    The Plague (book) by Albert Camus

  • 10/1 Oscarweb Round-up said

    [...] • Speaking of blindness, a ranking of the five most plausible doomsday movies. [Spout Blog] [...]

  • Lifeboat said

    Good article on existential threats that life / humanity faces. If you or readers are interested, check out the Lifeboat Foundation, a non-profit focused on identifying all natural or man made existential threats that civilization faces and working to mitigate those threats, including asteroid impacts, runaway nanotechnology, pandemics, nearbye supernovae, malevolent artificial intelligence, etc. We have over 500 members on the scientific advisory boards including some nobel prize winning scientists.

  • JohnnyQ48 said

    ” Most credible scientists doubt Vinge’s hypothesis.” I think the author is implying that Vinge is some sort of author/kook when anyone who took one of his computer science courses over the years would know that he is, in fact, a very gifted and *credible* authority on computers. There is still research into neural networks and biomechanical devices. The T100 from Cyberdyne Systems could be a reality in then next 20 to 30 years. The Japanese seem to have no qualms with pushing the robot envelope.

    Don’t count out the singularity just yet.

  • links for 2008-10-01 | Nerdcore said

    [...] Five Doomsday Movies Ranked by Likelihood | SpoutBlog (tags: Movies Lists Apocalypse) [...]

  • kevin said

    Lifeboat, thanks for the heads up about your organization, sounds cool.

    JohnnyQ48, I personally am not worried about the singularity, but I do believe that Vinges is a smart guy. I tried wording my doubt in a somewhat soft way, so as not to rule out the possibility entirely. Another person who has done some interesting writing on the subject is Kevin Kelly, founding editor of Wired magazine. In fact, he wrote a post about the singularity the same day this post was published, just by coincidence. Here’s the link:

    http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/09/thinkism.php

  • Five Doomsday Movies « The Rhetorican said

    [...] Five Doomsday Movies October 4, 2008 Posted by Jehuda in Uncategorized. Tags: Entertainment, Film, News trackback Via Thompson on Hollywood: On the occasion of Blindness opening this weekend, here’s a list of 5 doomsday movies ranked by likelihood. [...]

  • The Great Geek Manual » Geek Media Round-Up: October 7, 2008 said

    [...] to Five Doomsday Movies Ranked by Likelihood, Skynet is never going to become a reality, but that doesn’t keep me from administering a [...]

  • Mariano said

    I study computer sciences, and it is proven with a theorem that it is impossible to make a program that decides if another program ends or not.
    So, it will be impossible to a software create another software (for instance, the S.O. and applications in a robot to command to kill all mankind).
    In other hand, there is no reason for computers to kill us because we represent no threat to them.

  • 5 Doomsday Films that could happen in reality | News Blog said

    [...] li­n­­k­: here Share and [...]

  • Simon said

    Well dah!
    Should likeliness be your compass when considering doomsday scenario movies… mostly when, like in Children of Men or, even more so in Blindness, the doomsday scenario in question is meant to be metaphorical? Blindness by the way was written by Litterature Nobel Jose Saramago. and the original title of the book tells you a lot about what it should stand as: Essay on Blindness.

  • 5 Doomsday Films that could happen in reality | Geek Central said

    [...] read more | digg story This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 30th, 2008 at 3:54 pm and is filed under Movies. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]

  • Introspective said

    Blindness is a nice refreshment in the niche of apocalyptic movies. Plot is intriguing, characters are well developed. We see how people can turn into the different persons in special situations.