It seems the Scandinavians know something we don’t: the Nazis are coming back. There are a slew of delicious looking indie features coming out of Northern Europe, three of which share a common antagonist: Nazis. Why this sudden interest in a decades-old threat? What is it about the present day that makes fascism even scarier than usual?
Iron Sky, a Finnish film about Nazis escaping to the moon at the end of WWII and returning to destroy Earth in 2018, is currently in pre-production. The filmmakers did a terrific job promoting their last film, Star Wreck, online. For Iron Sky, they are involving fans in every step of the process, including funding. They’ve already produced a killer trailer (see above).
The English subtitled version of the trailer for Dead Snow hit the web last week (via Twitch). The film, produced in Norway, follows a group of young people in a secluded cabin, fighting for survival against a horde of zombie Nazis. It looks like classic horror based on a fresh and funny premise.
But why Nazis and why now?
The third film that comes to mind when thinking about this trend is not a genre film like the other two, but a WWII period piece. Flame & Citron, a Danish film about the true story of resistance fighters in Copenhagen, is a superb blend of action, espionage, and high drama.
Nazis have been villains in movies for as long as they’ve been around. In many ways they’re the perfect adversaries. They’ve driven, methodical, and ruthlessly evil. Indiana Jones, The Rocketeer, and Hellboy, among many others, have had success inserting Nazis into fantasy. In the case of these movies, as well as Iron Sky and Dead Snow, the Nazi threat is amped up by a fantastic trump card, a hidden ace that would let the fascists overturn the precarious balance of power. It could be a jet pack, the Ark of the Covenant, a secret moon base, or hunger for brains long after death.
So in one sense, the move toward more Nazi villains is obvious: they are scary and evil. But I think there is more to it. This is somewhat speculative, but there is a sense of dread and paranoia that is very palpable, especially in Flame & Citron, which seems more relevant now than ever before. I normally devote this weekly column to post-apocalyptic or dystopian futures, but talking about Flame & Citron seems appropriate here. Although it is set in WWII, it is essentially apocalyptic, the characters are struggling to prevent the end of their world. Without the advantage of hindsight there was no light at the end of the tunnel. While the cost of the War on the United States was tremendous, I imagine the impact of the war on nations that were occupied or otherwise strong-armed by the Nazis was even more dreadful.
What Flame & Citron reveals is that fascism is such a sneaky enemy because while it seeks to destroy dissenters, it also rewards the party faithful. In other words, every individual has to choose whether to oppose fascism and face certain doom, or tolerate it and try to play it to their advantage.
It’s not unreasonable to say that the renewed interest in the threat of fascism, especially from a part of the world like Northern Europe, is directly linked to current global politics. With the proliferation of terrorist watch lists, warrantless wiretapping, and secret prisons, nations and individuals not directly effected by the conflict are forced to choose: remain complicit, or stand up to a threat you may feel powerless to stop. Either way, these are scary times.
why are the nazis still so scary after all these decades?
because they killed millions of civilians. millions, and brutally. this is not that common if you look at a timeline of human history…
Why more Nazis?..well maybe we are being buttered up for “Valkyrie”…
the new Bryan Singer film with Tom Cruise as Von Stauffenberg,the guy who tried to blow up Hitler ..seems like lots of doodah is hitting the fan already about this,not least in Germany.Including from the Von Stauffenberg family…they dont like the fact that Hollywood has appropriated a story that German Cinema may well think itself better qualified,and by now ,justified, in telling . I see it’s not the first time by a long way..and “Valkyrie” it seems,could well be seen as a re-make of “Stauffenberg” a critically acclaimed German made 2004 T.V movie….They also dont like Tom Cruise personally,notably because of his “religious” beliefs…(cue “Religulous” review) BBC Radio four did a show about it a few weeks back ,with (audio only, obviously) clips .and .I must say,i couldnt help laughing at and bemoaning the fact that not a trace of a German accent is evident,least of all from Tom Cruise..I know it’s not necessarily a pre-requisite,but couldnt he at least have given it a go?Arent “actors” meant to be able to do that sort of thing? Didnt they have German accents in Schindlers List”? Other cast members include Stephen Fry and Eddie Izzard..wait a minute, sounds like it’s a COMEDY anyway!
Now you know i’m not anti-American, (anti-Bush yes..) but i cant help imagining a whole tranch of the audience for this thinking “hey, an American guy infiltrated, and tried to stop him… dude” ..sorry, but i know i’m not the only one thinking that..
In “The Boy In The Striped Pyjamas” David Thewlis plays the Commandant of a concentration camp,and is chillingly believable ,it’s not like we should demand Cruise speak German..but why not cast someone who could pull off the same job that Thewlis did.? I suppose it’s about box office and Cruise’s career?…
On the up side.Of course it’s good that a story that hasnt been told in a “big” movie before will get put “out there” ,and more people will be educated to the fact that there WAS opposition to Hitler ,within Germany…so in the case of “Valkyrie” at least the Nazis will not just be the shorthand for evil that you refer to,the comic extras in a “from hell” /”opening pandoras box” type scenario…progress anyone?
Chris Morrell