Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post
The Leonard Maltin Movie Game

The Leonard Maltin Movie Game

Kevin Kelly
By Kevin Kelly posted 11 months ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Leonard Maltin has been publishing his Leonard Maltin’s Movie Guide under various different titles (The Movie and Video Guide, TV Movies, etc.) since 1969, although he didn’t start putting out annual updated editions until 1987. In 2005 he started publishing Leonard Maltin’s Classic Movie Guide, which only covers movies released in 1960 and before, mostly so he could save space in the annual editions. Either way, the standard annual edition is a pretty fat book, chock full of capsulized movie reviews that are about two or three sentences long, at most.

This past September at Fantastic Fest, Tim and Karrie League of the Alamo Drafthouse introduced me to the wonder of the Leonard Maltin Movie Game. If Maltin has any moxie, he might want to put out his own edition of this, complete with his smiling mug branded all over the box. Although chances are that you already have everything you need to play, right in your own home. Read on to find out how you can entertain friends, and poke fun at Maltin’s writing style, all in one evening.

What you need:

  • Pens or pencils
  • Paper or note cards
  • One copy of any edition of Leonard Maltin’s Movie Guide. Honestly, the pre-2005 editions are best because they’re stuffed with movies, and the reviews are tiny. If you don’t have one, you can usually find them for under a buck at any good used bookstore, or on the internet.

That’s it. No fancy dice or colored pawns or a funky playing board. Gather your friends around, hand out the paper and the writing utensils, and you’re good to go.

How to play:

Make sure everyone gets a minute or two to glance through the Guide if they aren’t familiar with it. You’ll want to read a couple of the reviews out loud (ignoring the actor and director name listings), just so everyone can get a sense of Maltin’s style. Here’s an example: “Abraham Lincoln, 1930: Huston is excellent in this sincere but static biography of Lincoln; can’t match Griffith’s silent masterpieces.” The key is to pick movies that no one in the group has heard of, and there are enough titles in this book to insure that’s true for years to come.

So, once everyone is fairly familiar, start the game. Arbitrarily decide who is going to be the first person to read from the book, and everyone else will play. The reader flips to a random page, and starts naming titles until you can find one that nobody is familiar with. Let’s say you end up choosing 1957’s Abandon Ship. Read the title out loud, not the description. Everyone then has to write down their own Maltin-esque review on a piece of paper and hand them in face down. While this is going on, the reader writes down the actual review, and shuffles it in with the rest of the answers.

After everyone has handed in an answer, the reader reads back all of the reviews in random order. Someone may have written something like this: “Slapstick comedy aboard an aging battleship struggling to pass inspection doesn’t hold water. Stunning performance from Donald O’Connor gets washed away with the rest of the film. ” And so on. The goal here is to ape Maltin’s style as closely as possible. Oddly enough, you’ll naturally fall into it after a round or two. The actual review in the guide for that movie is this, “Tyrone Power is officer suddenly in command of lifeboat holding survivors from sunken luxury liner. Tense, exciting study of people fighting to stay alive while exposed to savage seas and each other.”

After they’ve all of the reviews been read, everyone else has to individually vote on their favorite. Tally up all the votes at the end, and score it like this: Every time someone voted on your review, that’s a point, and if you voted on the correct Maltin review, that’s a point. Whoever scores the most points wins that round. Play for as many rounds as you like, or until you just can’t take it anymore.

It will quickly devolve into an effort to try and crack people up by writing extremely wacky reviews, or else someone will try to get ultra-serious and write the best Maltinized reviews ever. Board game nuts will recognize it as a variation of Balderdash, but for movie lovers it can’t be beat. Try it out over the upcoming holidays, and you’ll be spreading the word as well.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • Ant Timpson said

    Hi Kevin

    This game is very dare to my heart. So please excuse the self-serving nature of this reply. Sad as it is to say, MALTINS one of my proudest achievements.

    As the originator of MALTINS™ I like to think Balderdash came from MALTINS ™ and not the other way around. Actually MALTINS ™ came from another game we used to play which was Dictionary… same as MALTINS ™ just with a dictionary.

    A round of MALTINS ™ is one revolution of the table with all participants having one turn as Maltin. The game is complete when everyone has chosen a Maltin synopsis.

    Tables must contain more than 4 and less than 8. Less than 4 and its kind of lame. More than 8 and its too hard to keep track of all the reviews and its not fair to those ones read out early.

    The sanctioned version that I created in the early 90s in New Zealand (same version shown to Tim and Karrie in Austin) then the scoring is as follows :

    1. Players the ‘real’ Maltin synopsis - 2pts
    2. Others players choosing your ‘fake’ Maltin synopsis - 1pt
    3. No one guesses the ‘real’ synopsis - Divide number of all players by 2 (6 people playing = 3pts)

    The scoring was chosen after many years of refinement.

    Some obvious things for people to remember.

    - Number the random reviews before reading them out. To help players keep track of what was read.
    - All are read once and once only.
    - Dealers must read all the reviews thoroughly in their mind, so as not to stumble when reading.
    - No laughing at your ‘own’ review
    - No overuse of the name ‘Taylor’ in regards to an actor

    There are a few expert rules that come into play when you’ve been playing with the same group for 12yrs !

    We have a collection of few thousand odd fake synopsi for films. Maybe we’ll put out a guide with Leonard’s mug on it - except with a patch on one eye and call it the Pirate Edition.

    Have Fun.
    And keep On Maltining.

    cheers
    Ant

    ps - the ™ is of course a bad joke.

  • Ant Timpson said

    delete first post - errors.

    Hi Kevin
    This game is very dare to my heart. So please excuse the self-serving nature of this reply. Sad as it is to say, MALTINS one of my proudest achievements.

    As the originator of MALTINS™ I like to think Balderdash came from MALTINS ™ and not the other way around. Actually MALTINS ™ came from another game we used to play which was Dictionary… same as MALTINS ™ just with a dictionary.

    A round of MALTINS ™ is one revolution of the table with all participants having one turn as Maltin (dealer). The game is complete when everyone has chosen a Maltin synopsis.

    Tables must contain more than 4 and less than 8. Less than 4 and its kind of lame. More than 8 and its too hard to keep track of all the reviews and its not fair to those ones read out early.

    The sanctioned version that I created in the early 90s in New Zealand (same version shown to Tim and Karrie in Austin) then the scoring is as follows :

    1. Players choose the ‘real’ Maltin synopsis - 2pts
    2. Others players choosing your ‘fake’ Maltin synopsis - 1pt
    3. No one guesses the ‘real’ synopsis - Divide number of all players by 2 and dealer gets that (6 people playing = 3pts)

    The scoring was chosen after many years of refinement. Some obvious things for players to remember.

    - Dealer should number the random reviews before reading them out. To help players keep track of what was read.

    - All are read once and once only.

    - Dealers must read all the reviews thoroughly in their mind, so as not to stumble when reading.

    - No laughing at your ‘own’ review

    - No overuse of the name ‘Taylor’ in regards to an actor
    There are a few expert rules that come into play when you’ve been playing with the same group for 12yrs !

    We have a collection of few thousand odd fake synopsi for films. Maybe we’ll put out a guide with Leonard’s mug on it - except with a patch on one eye and call it the Pirate Edition.

    Have Fun.

    And keep On Maltining.
    cheers
    Ant

    ps - the ™ is of course a bad joke.

  • Ant Timpson said

    ahh can you change ‘dare’ to dear as well - first line,
    me moron !

  • Erin D. said

    Doug Benson also has a version of this game he plays on his podcast, I Love Movies. They both also make great spectator games.