<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex and Violence &#038; THE WRESTLER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/11/sex-and-violence-the-wrestler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/11/sex-and-violence-the-wrestler/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lauren Wissot</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/11/sex-and-violence-the-wrestler/#comment-118225</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Wissot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=8164#comment-118225</guid>
		<description>"I mean, she’s the one who quits at all end, "

Exactly.  If Pam were truly "pole addicted," she metaphorically would have taken that dive, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I mean, she’s the one who quits at all end, &#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly.  If Pam were truly &#8220;pole addicted,&#8221; she metaphorically would have taken that dive, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joie</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/11/sex-and-violence-the-wrestler/#comment-118224</link>
		<dc:creator>Joie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=8164#comment-118224</guid>
		<description>Actually, I thought the film was suggesting "Cassidey" had indeed suffered from "Pole Addiction," her story as a foil to Rourke (I don't know if you wanted the filmmakers to resort to cheap parallel editing to hammer you with the obvious).  I mean, she's the one who quits at all end, while Rouke's Ram stage-dive (literally) into the abyss of the filmic blackout.  Both of their children suffered from one degree to another from parental neglect.  And from all those scenes of her being agitated by the lack of eyes devouring her on stage, Pam also confronts the sad truth of her profession, leave to the young girls.   Kudos to both Pam/Ram for their Golden Globes noms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I thought the film was suggesting &#8220;Cassidey&#8221; had indeed suffered from &#8220;Pole Addiction,&#8221; her story as a foil to Rourke (I don&#8217;t know if you wanted the filmmakers to resort to cheap parallel editing to hammer you with the obvious).  I mean, she&#8217;s the one who quits at all end, while Rouke&#8217;s Ram stage-dive (literally) into the abyss of the filmic blackout.  Both of their children suffered from one degree to another from parental neglect.  And from all those scenes of her being agitated by the lack of eyes devouring her on stage, Pam also confronts the sad truth of her profession, leave to the young girls.   Kudos to both Pam/Ram for their Golden Globes noms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
