<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oscars: Best Picture Underdogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/31/oscars-best-picture-underdogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/31/oscars-best-picture-underdogs/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Katie H</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/31/oscars-best-picture-underdogs/#comment-119197</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=8742#comment-119197</guid>
		<description>My pick: "Let the right one in" 

was really annoyed by The Dark Knight's constant state of climax, the million and one twists and turns. Although I loved that sound before each Joker attack, liked the final "choice" with the boats, the constant annoying twists just ruined the film for me in the end. It is just unnatural to have so many climaxes in one film. On the human body, if a man has an erection for more than a certain number of hours, he is supposed to go the emergency room. There is supposed to be an ebb and flow to a story. I don't mind experimentation, but...ugh. The final boat "choice" between right and wrong, sacrifice for the greater good and personal survival would have hit home harder if the film didn't have a trillion plot twists before it. After a while i was so desensitized, i honestly didn't give a crap anymore. I get it, you are a smart action movie.

Liked Iron man, nice ending, love Robert Downey Junior, campy parts, but good. 

didn't like Wall-E as a whole, the first part of the film is very lovable. In fact, I'm convinced that the first part of the movie is why there are so many Oscar advocates for it. But the second part is where it dwindles in unoriginal, "fun-family-film" stuff mediocrity. or Meh's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pick: &#8220;Let the right one in&#8221; </p>
<p>was really annoyed by The Dark Knight&#8217;s constant state of climax, the million and one twists and turns. Although I loved that sound before each Joker attack, liked the final &#8220;choice&#8221; with the boats, the constant annoying twists just ruined the film for me in the end. It is just unnatural to have so many climaxes in one film. On the human body, if a man has an erection for more than a certain number of hours, he is supposed to go the emergency room. There is supposed to be an ebb and flow to a story. I don&#8217;t mind experimentation, but&#8230;ugh. The final boat &#8220;choice&#8221; between right and wrong, sacrifice for the greater good and personal survival would have hit home harder if the film didn&#8217;t have a trillion plot twists before it. After a while i was so desensitized, i honestly didn&#8217;t give a crap anymore. I get it, you are a smart action movie.</p>
<p>Liked Iron man, nice ending, love Robert Downey Junior, campy parts, but good. </p>
<p>didn&#8217;t like Wall-E as a whole, the first part of the film is very lovable. In fact, I&#8217;m convinced that the first part of the movie is why there are so many Oscar advocates for it. But the second part is where it dwindles in unoriginal, &#8220;fun-family-film&#8221; stuff mediocrity. or Meh&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Bowen</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/31/oscars-best-picture-underdogs/#comment-119138</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Bowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=8742#comment-119138</guid>
		<description>Well, if I had to fill the last slot, it would be with Man on Wire or Rachel Getting Married. If I could slide out one of the three locks that you mention, I would add both. but at that point I might as well just kill the whole thing and insert my dream lineup, right? 

That said, on a practical level, I think Wall-E is the most likely upset-er for the fifth slot. I'm not a huge Wall-E fan, but that seems to be where the critical support lies for a surprise. 

I think Iron Man was a great Robert Downey performance wrapped in a so-so summer movie. But then why doesn't someone start a Downey for Best Actor campaign? It would make much more sense. He made that film. I'd rather see that than some consolation supporting nod for Tropic Thunder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if I had to fill the last slot, it would be with Man on Wire or Rachel Getting Married. If I could slide out one of the three locks that you mention, I would add both. but at that point I might as well just kill the whole thing and insert my dream lineup, right? </p>
<p>That said, on a practical level, I think Wall-E is the most likely upset-er for the fifth slot. I&#8217;m not a huge Wall-E fan, but that seems to be where the critical support lies for a surprise. </p>
<p>I think Iron Man was a great Robert Downey performance wrapped in a so-so summer movie. But then why doesn&#8217;t someone start a Downey for Best Actor campaign? It would make much more sense. He made that film. I&#8217;d rather see that than some consolation supporting nod for Tropic Thunder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shirley</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/31/oscars-best-picture-underdogs/#comment-119023</link>
		<dc:creator>shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 01:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=8742#comment-119023</guid>
		<description>the dark knight should get nominated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the dark knight should get nominated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MidgardDragon</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/31/oscars-best-picture-underdogs/#comment-119022</link>
		<dc:creator>MidgardDragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=8742#comment-119022</guid>
		<description>Go see WALL-E, you'll be backing it in no time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go see WALL-E, you&#8217;ll be backing it in no time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branden</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/31/oscars-best-picture-underdogs/#comment-118998</link>
		<dc:creator>Branden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=8742#comment-118998</guid>
		<description>I wanted to champion a film that is more in the indie side that I thought was brilliant. Courtney Hunt's film, "Frozen River." Also, Martin McDonaugh's "In Bruges".

I want to see those up for Best Picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to champion a film that is more in the indie side that I thought was brilliant. Courtney Hunt&#8217;s film, &#8220;Frozen River.&#8221; Also, Martin McDonaugh&#8217;s &#8220;In Bruges&#8221;.</p>
<p>I want to see those up for Best Picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Everleth</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2008/12/31/oscars-best-picture-underdogs/#comment-118995</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Everleth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=8742#comment-118995</guid>
		<description>It's "Poultrygeist" or nothing. Plus, Lloyd Kaufman for Best Director. This film might be his masterpiece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;Poultrygeist&#8221; or nothing. Plus, Lloyd Kaufman for Best Director. This film might be his masterpiece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
