Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

Our Favorite Jeffrey Wells Moments in 2008

John Lichman
By John Lichman posted 10 months ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

via Hollywood Elsewhere

It is a crime in this day and age not to occasionally check in on Jeffrey Wells’ Hollywood Elsewhere, with topics ranging from billboard photos, blind item brunches and oddly angry political rants against apathetic teenagers.

Wells is a classic mix of online reactionary and keen insight, peppered with various “what the fuck” moments and the occasional non sequitur involving Paris Hilton and Al-Qaeda. To ring in the New Year, let’s take a quick look back at our favorite blogged remarks from the man who confused Mike D’Angelo with Ed Gonzalez, and whose random photos of restaurants and lawns oddly resemble–for lack of a better term–art. Also, any use of bold is for emphasis and my own editorial comments are in italics.

Happy New Year, Elephants
On New Year’s Eve, it sounds like Jeff was staying at a raucous party house in one of the Boroughs (Manhattan, Brooklyn? Who can tell these days.) Conditions were so bad that he was sadly driven to bar-hopping due to his neighbors:

I live below a family of animals — Hispanic party elephants — who stomp around and play music so loud that the building throbs and the plaster cracks. It’s a fairly safe bet they’re going to lose their minds tonight so I may as well just huddle down in the city and bounce around from bar to bar.

Follow-up in the comments from Wells:

People with a little class and breeding and a college degree don’t tend to be as noisy or boisterous or loutish as the commoners, cretins, galumphs, bad dressers, etc. The lower end of the gene pool. T’was ever thus.

Wells on Sundance: Dagnabbit Kids Be Knockin’ Boots!
One of the subjects dearest and most familiar to Wells is Sundance. His dispatches? Legendary. His mocking of “road to Sundance” articles? Acidic. But the real fun starts when he complains about never getting laid at this supposedly hedonistic festival:

For journalists, Sundance is pretty much synonymous with tight accomodations[sic] and shared bathrooms. O give me a bunk and a shower and a table and a chair and some good wifi, and it’s all cool. Not only do serious festivalgoers make do without outdoor hot tubs or crackling fireplaces or nouveau riche Deer Valley chateaus with 22-foot-high ceilings or those bullshit Utah buckaroo king-size bed frames. It’s kind of against the mindset (the religion, if you will) to stay in a lavish place. Pricey McMansion digs are for the dilletantes[sic] and lookie-lous and — the absolute dregs of Sundance Film Festival visitors — skiiers[sic].

I’m a loyal fan of Carol Rixey’s Star Hotel [Remember this name], easily the warmest and homiest place in town. And it has great wifi, and an excellent living room with soft easy chairs and fat sofas, and a dining room with nice long table to have a nice warm breakfast in. (Comes with the room.)

I can tell you something — it’s the volunteers and the assistants sleeping in those Cider House beds who get all the nookie. In the mid ’90s I asked an assortment of festival veterans if they’d ever gotten lucky during Sundance, and all but one said “nope.” The exception was Usual Suspects and Valkyrie screenwriter Chris McQuarrie, who said yes, good things have personally happened to him in Park City but “only with an import.”

Wells on Sundance, pt 2: Fear and Loathing in Park City
It’s a post that could have simply consisted of, “I have arrived at Sundance. Huh. Time to go to bed. Actually, I don’t need to post this.” In Wells’ hands, it’s a literary masterwork:

Nobody’s here. That I recognize. Empty streets, idle merchants, half-filled restaurants…the last quiet that Park City will know for 10 or 11 days. It all cranks up starting tomorrow. I shared a $34 dollar airport shuttle into town with Hollywood Reporter guy Gregg Goldstein — that’s the single most noteworthy thing that’s happened over the last eight or nine hours. It’s now about 3 or 4 degrees outside. Ice crystals in my nostrils. A big storm is coming on Sunday, the shuttle driver said.

Challenge:Link Shitty CGI-Monster Movie to a Katrina documentary
Ask yourself: how would you link Cloverfield to Trouble the Water? One’s an over-hyped J.J. Abrams joint, the other an award-winning documentary about surviving Hurricane Katrina. But if you’re Wells, comparing the two is easier than snapping a cell phone shot of your dinner:

I’ve almost never felt queasy from jiggly, hand-held photography (I eat films like Dancer in the Dark for breakfast), although I’ll admit that Cloverfield has more than its share. Yesterday, however, I saw the King Kong of hand-held nausea jiggle movies — Tia Lessin and Carl Deal’s Trouble The Water, a doc about the Katrina disaster.

Half of it was shot by Lessin and Deal in the usual fashion and is no big challenge, but the other half is shakycam footage of Katrina’s devastation shot by one of the film’s main subjects, Kimberly Rivers. (The other is her husband Scott.) The footage is so scattered and whip-panny that I was starting to think about bolting less than ten minutes in. Show Trouble The Water to those Cloverfield sufferers in Pheonix[sic] and they’d spew in their seat.

In Which Glenn Kenny Becomes a Platform for Obama
Originally a blind item from Glenn Kenny, Wells added his own spin to it: mainly, the names of all parties involved—including the NY PR guy. (Spoiler: Alex Rivera got harassed by a racist swag shop chick accompanying two actors from his film, Sleep Dealer.)

Note: Kenny doesn’t identify the players by name in his piece. I was given the lowdown last night after a showing of Patti Smith: Dream of Life.

Followup: In a world of my own devising an organized demonstration would be held outside the photo shoot/swag sometime late this afternoon. The chant could be something along the lines of “Hey hey, ho ho, swag racists have to go!” An all-media advisory would be sent out this morning. The usual pitchforks and torches would be handed out of the back of a pickup truck on Swede Alley 30 minutes prior to the start of the demonstration. Flyers with a photo of swag girl who uttered the racist remark would be wild-posted all over town alongside a slogan that reads, “Who are we? Does Barack Obama have reason to be concerned?”

YAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Rambo came out earlier this year. It was supposed to be…well, we’re still not sure what. But Wells was excited about it. How excited? Howard Dean Death Yell excited.

Every time a head got sliced or blown off, I laughed or let go with a big “yawww!” So did the mostly-male audience which applauded at the end. Everyone had a great time. I felt relaxed with these guys…bonded.

This is the second best Rambo film after First Blood, and although it’s obviously not meant to be “funny,” it is at times, wildly so. I laughed out loud on a good five or six occasions. Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez are going to love this thing. You could even make a case for Rambo being an instant porno-violent classic in the vein of Ron Ormond’s The Monster and the Stripper, Alejandro Jodorowsky’s Santa Sangre, Herschel Gordon Lewis’s Blood Feast…that line of country.

Kicker for a Jack Matthews Tribute or Obscure Reference to Self-Masturbation: You Decide.

Ok, this was the kicker to a post honoring Jack Matthews, formerly of the New York Post. But take it out of context, and it may cause you to question what the hell is being honored here.

I will never stop banging it out. One is either busy being born or busy dying. I know where I stand. Die at your desk.

Honest Injun Gayness
Remember that “Full Retard” line from Tropic Thunder? Well, this is like that, but praising an actor for being “Full Gay” and “Full Dick.” Honest Injun.

I felt a genuine gayness from Sean Penn, who plays the title role of the late San Francisco supervisor Harvey Milk, that I didn’t think he had in him.

And Frank Langella’s performance as Richard Nixon is naturally and necessarily more toned down than it was on-stage, and that, Honest Injun, makes it a fascinating, moving (as in genuinely sad), award-level effort.

No. Fucking. Idea.
This is supposed to be a either joke or an insidery snark attack against film catch-phrases. To be quite honest, I’m still convinced this is a secret code to…something.

Do I look like I’m negotiating, friendo? I’m already pregnant so what kind of milkshake-slurping could I get into? Except for ruining the love life of my older sister and her lower-class boyfriend by bearing false witness? I am Sheba, the reincarnation of Shirley Booth!

[No, really. That's the entire post.]

No Fatties, But…
Apparently one of Wells’ great fears is to sit near fat people in a confined space. He shares this with us, followed by the strangest blog update I’ve ever seen. And trust me, I’ve read Hollywood Elsewhere.

Before every flight, I cross myself and ask God Almighty not to seat me next to a morbidly obese person. There are at least two whales in line right now, and I’m feeling a very slight apprehension about this. There are thousands of people in Paris who look well-fed or stocky or fat, but I’ve seen no Jabbas. You might expect otherwise in a foodie city like Paris, but nope.

Update: No fatties but Doug Liman is on my plane.

Live-Blogging is like Swimming After Eating, We Guess
Eric Kohn live-blogged Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skulll for IndieWire. Many were not amused by this. Mainly because they’re twits–something about “herp derp critic integrity!” Mainly because Eric scooped them and wasn’t doing anything that off from the rest of the Cannes crowd. Devin Faraci–a frequent HE commenter, natch–took offense with this. And of course, Jeff agreed. Sort of.

I agree totally — it’s doggerel. Lame. Kohn and Indiewire were simply looking to be first to provide the very first commentary on the film anywhere in the world — except it wasn’t commentary but rudimentary (i.e., quite crude) descriptions of scenes as they happened. There’s an internet audience for this kind of stenography, of course, but to what end? A movie deserves a little thought before before commented on. I tapped out an instant hand-held judgment after Indy 4 ended, but at least I’d thought it through for an hour or two.

Remember that Hotel in Park City?
Fun fact: if you leave a piece of clothing somewhere, that’s as good as a down payment, credit card or loan. From now on, I’ll be paying my bar tabs with socks.

[Jeffrey Wells] to Star Hotel proprietor: “I found a place in Park City but I can’t move in until Friday the 16th. Would you let me crash on the living-room couch for the first two nights (1.14 and 1.15)? Which I’ll pay you for, of course. It would be greatly appreciated if you could grant me this small favor, as you left me in the lurch this year. I thought I’d made it clear as a bell that I intended to return, having stayed in your wonderful abode the last two years and leaving my cowboy hat there and telling you I’d wear it when I returned in ‘09 and so on. Anyway, can ya do me this one?”

When pressed to explain, Wells continues in the Comments:

Yes, yes…if I’d left a cash deposit or a credit-card number then the room would have been assured. I’m not an idiot. But leaving the cowboy hat and plainly stating to the proprietor that I’d come back and wear it the following year (especially after having stayed at the Star in ‘07 and ‘08 and been part of the family there, in a sense) was a very emotionally vivid and pronounced way of stating my intentions. It was a message that is recognized by everyone all over the world. It’s even recognized in the animal kingdom (i.e., leaving your scent on a piece of turf).

If you go out with a girl and she comes home with you and stays the night and she leaves her underwear or bra or socks in your bedroom after she leaves the next morning, we all know that’s a universal message that says, “I want to come back and get to know you better and probably have sex with you again.” Everyone knows that. Leaving an article of clothing, something with your scent and paw-prints and sweat residue on it, means that you intend to come back and spray your scent around some more.

If you were to see a 1930s Gary Cooper western and hotel manager Frances Farmer, giving him the old twinkle-eye, asked him if he was coming back after taking his cattle to market, and if he faintly grinned at her and took off his cowboy hat and left it hanging on the wall as he walks out the door, everybody watching the film in any country in the world would know exactly what that means. It would be crystal clear. So don’t tell me. Credit cards are well and good, but to say left-behind cowboy hats and such mean nothing is to be way too “dollars and cents” about this matter.

Sadly, it looks like the hotel gave his cowboy hat to the police–Jeff then posts the phone call as an audio file.

So Jeffrey, we wish you a happy new year and can’t wait to see what sort of insanity you give out this year. If you’ve got your own favorite Wells-ian moments, leave them in the comments.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • 1/3 Oscarweb Round-up said

    [...] • A creepily in depth look at the top “Jeffrey Wells moments” of 2008.  Yeah.  We’re the story. [Spout Blog] [...]

  • Mike said

    Was the whole thing about asking for nude stills of some starlet from the director of said film this year, or was that last year - I can’t remember? That’s about when I realized that Wells is pretty much a schmuck. An entertaining, oddball one, but a schmuck none-the-less.

  • katiehall said

    The Hispanic low-end-of-the-gene-pool comments are vulgar and stink of low end of Racism, any end actually, both ends, the middle, the beginning. There is NOTHING wrong with partying and enjoying life to the fullest, or loudest. Jeff should simply walk up to his neighbor and ask them to turn it down.

  • Warrant said

    His hair! His hair! He and Rod Blagojevich have things to discuss. Namely, gel and styling brushes.

  • ja said

    Jeff Wells wished cancer upon me … it was by far my most cherished review of my short acting career

  • vadim said

    The nude pic in question was Vinessa Shaw in 3:10 TO YUMA. Gory particulars here:

    http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/creepiest-email-from-a-blogger-to-hollywood/

  • Allen said

    You left out the most revealing Wells Moment: his Obama-fervored Stalinist Purge that wiped the site of most of its most interesting commentators.

  • Pinko Punko said

    You forget of course the doomed small electronic devices waiting to be purloined, also the umbrella.

    Cherry picking won’t do you any favors, though, I think you could have talked some more of what makes him probably a good guy, even if his grampa pants are starting to hike up.

  • R. Conquest said

    Dude, you missed two of the all-time prize moments of Wells’ unhingedness from the past year.

    1. The Stalinist Purge
    More and more Wells was turning his movie blog into a low-rent Obama shill site. The problem was, the non-Obama-koolaid-drinkers (inevitably referred to as rightwingers, though often as not Hillary supporters or merely admirers of clear logic) like Walter Sobchak and Mgmax and Hickenlooper would take his cranky “observations” and the leftwing rants of commenters like SpinDozer and D.Z. and tear them apart. Finally Wells couldn’t take it any more, and so imagining himself a bloggy Che Guevara, he purged all dissenting points of view from his blog in what even he, with no apparent irony, admitted was a “Stalinist purge.” The trouble was, the “rightwingers” included many of the people who actually knew something about movies visiting his site, and now he only has the political ranters left, and posts about actual movies draw mostly silence from his much diminished base of commenters.
    http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/2008/08/stalinist_purge.php

    2. The “Omaba” Incident
    This is the one that shows why he’s untrustworthy and shouldn’t be allowed to operate a keyboard. A commenter named “Duck Dodgers” (possibly one of the purged rightwingers?) tried to reintroduce a certain level of non-lockstep-lefty dissent. It soon became clear that Wells, late at night in his cups, was mucking with Duck Dodgers’ posts, changing their spelling (eg, Obama to Omaba) and punctuation to make them appear illiterate. Dodgers managed to briefly get a response up calling Wells on this and pointing to the Google cache that proved his case; but Wells soon deleted all the evidence and his posts and insisted that Dodgers was “delusional.”
    http://www.hollywood-elsewhere.com/2008/10/mayor_tut-tuts.php

    Both of these are creepier, slimier and just plain weirder than anything you name.

  • Robert Peabody said

    Good Lord man, in what universe did Sobchak and Max “tear up” the “left wing” commenters on HE? Oh wait, I know: the universe occupied by those 25 percent who still approve of Bush and co.

  • Allen said

    PinkoPunko is the perfect example of the dull syncophants left at the site who write “Don’t change Jeff after you’ve proven to be a hypocritical bullying creep” — thus you have the sad level of commentors at the site. Which used to be great fun to read when you had such a panopoly of film thought, left center or right.

    What folks like pinko leave out is that Wells got rid of anybody calling him on his Stalinist bs, left center or right. And look how hard-ass Wells folded on O’Reilly. Tough as tissue that one.

    But the hat thing is classic.

  • Question.... said

    I’ve always wondered about Wells’ background. He often refers to the lack of class found in people without college degrees: ” People with a little class and breeding and a college degree don’t tend to be as noisy or boisterous or loutish as the commoners, cretins, galumphs, bad dressers, etc.”

    However, I’ve read his bio, but no where do I see any reference to a college degree. Does he have a degree? Or is he self-taught? Not that there’s anything wrong with that…He’s obviously intelligent and well versed in film. Just curious.

  • devin said

    How do you NOT post the one where he gets the people off Craigslist to housesit for him, and then sends them a vicious, classist and just plain ugly email about what Kentucky white trash they are?

    OR, even better, the one where he basically said the people in Texas deserve what they get from the hurricane because they’ve profited from oil?

    This dude is a class A douchebag. A fucking scum, and definitely at the top of my list of People I’d Love to Meet in a Dark Alley One Night. Look at that haircut! To quote Weird Science, “Anybody with a haircut like that, gotta be an asshole.”

  • RoyBatty said

    As any regular HE reader knows, I’ve been around bulldogging Wells for a LONG time. I have been banned 3 times already, and am currently on under another name and fictional persona (I actually know Wells and realized long ago that he bites the hand that pets him too often, hence the subterfuge)

    R Conquest and Allen are right, the most damaging thing was the self-described Stalinist purge of the summer. Many long time posters were kicked off and the place is poorer for it. Not that it’s been apparent due to the election year high political posts.

    All that said, the one thing you got wrong was the “No. Fucking. Idea.” It was clearly a mash-up of the year’s catch phrases presented as a challenge for the film freaks.

    And yes, the infamous 3:10 to Yuma nude pictures incident was in 2007. That one got me my first banning.

  • syms covington said

    I particularily loved this one, when he threw a bag of Mexican food at a cab:

    http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/2007/12/boston_cab_alte.php

    Plus, his description of Tim Roth is priceless:

    http://www.hollywood-elsewhere.com/2008/06/all_right.php

    “Poor Tim Roth does an okay job as the Hulk’s nemesis, but his head is growing larger and larger the older he gets — he’s looking like one of those bobbing-head football dolls — plus his nose is getting bigger, his shoulders are way too narrow and he seems to be as short as Dustin Hoffman.”

  • Pluna said

    What about his comments on Jon Voight? Many people started sending harassing emails to Wells. The whole Jon Voight thing lead to Wells being on The O’Reilly Factor!

    http://www.hollywood-newsroom.com/news/jeffery-wells-of-hollywood-elsewherecom-vs-bill-oreilly-over-blacklisting-jon-voight/

    Been reading Jeff since the Reel.com days…

  • R. Conquest said

    “Good Lord man, in what universe did Sobchak and Max “tear up” the “left wing” commenters on HE?”

    This one will do just fine, it was often pretty entertaining watching Sobchak or Max or whoever get bemusedly surreal in response to the increasingly splenetic Bush-hatred and irrelevant fact spouting of people like D.Z. (A favorite was when D.Z. was going off about Prescott Bush or Enron or something and one of them started replying to him with recipes.) But the really sad thing is that there were actual film threads on there and a lot of those guys really knew something about film. (Which, no doubt, is why they had to go from the Wells-centric universe.) Those threads would go on for hundreds of comments and really have a lot of interesting stuff in them.

    Now even the political threads rarely get more than 30 or so and the actual film-related ones are thinner yet (in both quantity and quality). Wells blew his site’s brains out when he purged it, not only getting rid of many of the best people but killing the conversation among those who remained– including himself.

  • Allen said

    And what’s left out of Well’s bizarre hatred for his site readers is their kindness when Wells lost his sister or needed cash to keep it afloat.

    It’s understandable why he would have to go strangers on craigslist to help him with a personal issue that any good friend could have handled. Sad.

  • step said

    Who could forget the priceless moment when his camera and iPhone were stolen in Toronto? After he noticed sketchy guys hanging around, he still didn’t take his camera and phone with him, and was outraged with today’s youth when they were missing after he returned from the bathroom. Hilarious.

    http://www.hollywood-elsewhere.com/2008/09/fuming.php

  • RoyBatty said

    R. Conquest has some rose colored glasses on about the number of comments ever reaching past 200 and the only film-related ones that got up around the 100 replies level were those that dealt with fan boy interest topics. I’ll eat my emotionally-vivid hat if someone cares to post a link to a discussion that got even over 150 replies.

    It is strange that the one thing that actually got him national exposure beyond film circles (the non-calling for of Jon Voight’s blacklisting) is the one thing that was left off this list. Of course, that is also the thing that brought him actual hate-mail and I believe a few hyperbolic death threats which is what set the stage for his purge of RWers from the site.

  • R. Conquest said

    Okay, hundreds is probably an exaggeration overall although here’s an example that had 270 comments of exceedingly high quality:

    http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/2008/02/eternal_polluti.php

    But okay, dozens is probably more accurate in general. Still, quality is what matters most, not quantity, I don’t see how you can argue that didn’t take a kamikaze dive when Jeff deliberately alienated half of his readers (at the behest of some Hollywood type he was sucking up to, if you read the original post… talk about a man of firm convictions).

    And I think it’s important to make a big distinction between whatever sickos may have fired off a dumbass threat following his O’Reilly appearance and the “right-wingers” (again, who ranged from Bushies to Clintonites) who generally behaved more civilly than the lefties. It would be very unfair to smear the longtime participants with that kind of drive-by stupidity and ugliness.

    Or let’s put it this way: do you believe that Walter, Max, Josh Massey or their like would have thrown BurmaShave, Christian, George Prager or D.Z. off just for holding different opinions?

  • Christian said

    From “perfect tommy” and that 270 thread:

    “One last thought from here about this thread. It says something about the relationship between Wells and his readers that he wanted to do something about “soul sucking” films, that he loathed. And his readers go to films that they love.”

    And those threads are what made HE probably the greatest film site on the web…for a brief time. The purge had nothing to do with getting rid of right-wingers since I was booted and as you might know, I’m a little bit to the left of Chomsky. But I did defend those like Mgmax or Sobchak who had a differing opine. Burma, Prager and some others had no problem with Well’s sociopathic behavior, but then, they’re li’l blog bullies too.

    And the site is now reduced to hilarity about Wells and his Sundance cowboy hat. Onward.

  • RoyBatty said

    I think if Wells ever finally booted D.Z. off there would be a national holiday…

  • transmogrifier said

    DZ could well be the worst talkbacker in the history of the internets. He’s the type of guy you wish was on the other side, such is his cringe-worthy attempts at addressing rational arguments (usually a string of ad hominems and et tu quoque logical fallacies).

    He also has an abysmal taste in film.

  • R. Conquest said

    I forget, Christian, what was your offense again… talking loudly in a coffeeshop, or wearing a T-shirt of insufficient thread count?

  • Christian said

    Honestly, I’m not sure. I think it came within me going after JW for his increasing mean-spiritedness towards his own readers and the liberal hypocrisy of banning anybody he perceived to be a threat. It was just such a weird Daily Kos type moment. And most revealing. I have survived.

  • CitizenKanedetc. said

    Christian, man, I miss you on the talkbacks there (I haven’t left because I still speak my mind and he somehow hasn’t banned me…must be some sort of oversight). Where you hangin’ out these days on ze web to discuss film? Anything worthwhile?

  • GW said

    Gee - who could have ever imagined that this comments section would rapidly mutate into a gathering/mutual masturbation spot for the Wells-banished Bushies.

    Here’s some news for y’all: Jeff’s reader count hasn’t dropped a whit since the purge, and his blog doesn’t miss you (collectively) in the slightest. It is still its own beast, and the commentaries are much, much better without the constant blathering from all of those who would mutate film threads into political threads. Which - sorry - makes it a much better read.

    But continue to have fun with the self-deluded mutual stroking, boys!

    [And, yes, "R. Conquest"... they most assuredly 'would'.]

  • CitizenKanedetc. said

    Conquest, I can honestly say that a couple months ago D.Z. (in some sort of once-in-a-lifetime clarity) wrote a post where he actually asked Wells if he could un-do the purge and invite them back. Of course, you can never truly un-do what you have done, but I thought it was pretty telling that one of the absolute thickest commenters on the site even realized the level of discourse was starting to sink a bit.

    Or maybe he just had fewer people to quote in his scatter-brained responses.

    Point is, it ain’t what it used to be, and probably never will be again. For the first half of 2008, HE contained some of the best (film or otherwise) back-and-forth I’ve ever witnessed on ye olde Internets.

  • Christian said

    Thanks Citizen. As I’m doing my own film blog, please stop by and contribute. And I stick to a few refined sites such as Poland’s site; Living in Cinema and others on my blogroll. Join us…

    And I would never ban DZ.

  • CitizenKanedetc. said

    Yeah, I saw the link on your name after posting here. Looks good, bud, perhaps I’ll drop in here and there. Long live Speed Racer, too.

  • R. Conquest said

    GW must be right. Look at how the level of discourse went up here with his visit.