<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oscar Predictions: Don&#8217;t Underestimate The Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/02/oscar-predictions-dont-underestimate-the-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/02/oscar-predictions-dont-underestimate-the-reader/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: stacey</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/02/oscar-predictions-dont-underestimate-the-reader/#comment-121269</link>
		<dc:creator>stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=9803#comment-121269</guid>
		<description>I hope it does win. The Reader was an amazing movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it does win. The Reader was an amazing movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/02/oscar-predictions-dont-underestimate-the-reader/#comment-121239</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=9803#comment-121239</guid>
		<description>My predictions:  "Slumdog", Rourke, Winslet.  I've got no money riding on 'em but I wish I did!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My predictions:  &#8220;Slumdog&#8221;, Rourke, Winslet.  I&#8217;ve got no money riding on &#8216;em but I wish I did!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwright40</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/02/oscar-predictions-dont-underestimate-the-reader/#comment-120318</link>
		<dc:creator>jwright40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=9803#comment-120318</guid>
		<description>Nope, won't happen.  Let's spend more time with the acting categories, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, won&#8217;t happen.  Let&#8217;s spend more time with the acting categories, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George C.</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/02/oscar-predictions-dont-underestimate-the-reader/#comment-120297</link>
		<dc:creator>George C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=9803#comment-120297</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you should study up more on Oscar History.  Only 9 films in the history of the Oscars have won best picture without at least being nominated for best editing.  The last one was 'Ordinary People' in 1980.  I'd say this is a really really slim chance to bet that 'The Reader' will win this year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you should study up more on Oscar History.  Only 9 films in the history of the Oscars have won best picture without at least being nominated for best editing.  The last one was &#8216;Ordinary People&#8217; in 1980.  I&#8217;d say this is a really really slim chance to bet that &#8216;The Reader&#8217; will win this year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reading The Reader - Carpetbagger Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/02/oscar-predictions-dont-underestimate-the-reader/#comment-120292</link>
		<dc:creator>Reading The Reader - Carpetbagger Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=9803#comment-120292</guid>
		<description>[...] that could interrupt “Slumdog’s” walk to the podium. He suggests that “The Reader” actually has a shot, because the Academy is always crushing on director Stephen Daldry and that the power of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that could interrupt “Slumdog’s” walk to the podium. He suggests that “The Reader” actually has a shot, because the Academy is always crushing on director Stephen Daldry and that the power of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2/3 Oscarweb Round-up</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/02/oscar-predictions-dont-underestimate-the-reader/#comment-120280</link>
		<dc:creator>2/3 Oscarweb Round-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 07:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=9803#comment-120280</guid>
		<description>[...] • Christopher Campbell&#8217;s reasons bot to underestimate &#8220;The Reader&#8221; at this stage. [Spout Blog] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] • Christopher Campbell&#8217;s reasons bot to underestimate &#8220;The Reader&#8221; at this stage. [Spout Blog] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
