Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

Super Bowl Ads 2009: Massive Misstep for 3D. Today in Film Bloggery 02/02/09

Christopher Campbell
By Christopher Campbell posted 9 months ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Jeffrey Katzenberg, for all his attempted promotion of digital 3D as the future of entertainment as we know it, may have done irreversible damage yesterday by attempting to advertise DreamWorks Animation’s upcoming digital 3D feature Monsters vs. Aliens by way of an anaglyphic 3D Super Bowl commercial necessitating outdated red/blue glasses. Here is a collection of scathing reactions found around the blogosphere:

  • Cinematical is polling readers for their reactions to the 3D ads, and so far the majority response, at 43%, is “I never picked up the glasses to begin with.” The most popular response from those who did have the glasses: “They were okay.”
  • One Cinematical reader asked the most important question in the poll’s comments section: “Why promote the amazing current gen tech that would wow the majority of public that hasn’t seen it with antiquated red/blue-lackluster crap?”
  • CrunchGear also has a poll, and the current majority is of the opinion the 3D ads were lame.
  • A sample comment on David Poland’s Hot Blog: “The unanimous opinion here was that the 3D in the Monsters Vs. Aliens ad sucked it” and simply. “
  • Alex of FirstShowing.net rants against the ads: “This whole Monsters vs Aliens gimmick, or publicity stunt, or whatever you want to call it, only achieved the act of being a gimmick and nothing more. All of those millions of people who did have glasses were caught up in a frenzy of enthusiam over the novelty rather than genuinely interested.”
  • I Watch Stuff also complains about the gimmickry: “I thought all the animation studios were pushing hard to legitimize 3-D as more than a gaudy bell and/or whistle. If that’s the case, maybe they should starting cutting all the look-at-this-coming-at-the-screen!-for-no-reason crap. A paddleball zooming at me? Come on. And furthermore, a paddleball at all? Does this generation of kids even know what a paddleball is? Why not a guy using a stick to roll a hoop out of the screen?”
  • Too little too late? DVICE got a response from someone who will be harmed by the responses: “The good news: The CEO of RealD Cinema, the technique in which Monsters and Aliens will be shown in theaters when it’s release this March, assured us this morning that his effects are much better. ‘It’s important to recognize that today’s RealD 3D in theatres is a quantum leap better than what they saw on TV or may remember from years past.’ The only thing we can gather from that damage control: RealD sucks less.” Exactly, and this still doesn’t explain why millions of viewers were marketed to with the outdated effects.
  • At Defamer, Seth ignores the 3D issue altogether and instead offers some criticism regarding the film itself, but ultimately he notes that negative responses don’t matter, because “This will make a gazillion dollars.” Well, if he’s right, then this won’t be a misstep for the technology after all. But I completely disagree with that box office prediction.
  • And now, in case you found the glasses (I hear some people had trouble getting their hands on them) and want to watch the commercial again (or for the first time), here is the Hulu embed:

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • J. Sperling Reich said

    This is a great round up of what some prominent bloggers were saying last night after the “Monsters vs. Aliens” trailer aired. I posted a somewhat similar piece on Celluloid Junkie in which I culled through hundreds of responses to the 3D trailer on Twitter:

    http://celluloidjunkie.com/2009/02/02/dreamworks-3d-super-bowl-stunt-gets-mixed-reviews/?disqus_reply=5793517#comment-5793517

    I added a link back to this post in the comments section. Nice work.

  • J. Sperling Reich said

    This is a great round up of what some prominent bloggers were saying last night after the “Monsters vs. Aliens” trailer aired. I posted a somewhat similar piece on Celluloid Junkie in which I culled through hundreds of responses to the 3D trailer on Twitter:

    http://celluloidjunkie.com/2009/02/02/dreamworks-3d-super-bowl-stunt-gets-mixed-reviews

    I added a link back to this post in the comments section. Nice work.

  • joem18b said

    I live down the street from SKG, where various friends work. Every time they talk about how they’re 100% 3D now, I ask myself if they’re nuts.

  • Andre said

    Did any of the blog authors actually bother getting the proper glasses - they were not using the old red/blue glasses as referred to in the article above.

  • Eddie Ho said

    We had 8 pairs of the blue and red glasses and it really fell flat at out Superbowl party. This is the outdated 3D that was a gimmick in the 50s. I recently saw My Bloody Valentine 3D and the effects were good, movie sucked but the 3D was very good. Because they are going to charge $3.50 a pair for the real 3D glasses they must have chosen not to do the commercials in that technology. Who will spend $3.50 to watch a commercial? So they went with an underwhelming 3D and the masses were underwhelmed.

  • actionman said

    who cares about this 3-D crap? The only ad worth paying attention too was the amazing Transformers 2 teaser. Holy shit does that film look huge.

  • Odaecom said

    I thought the effects looked good, lots of depth, although I do have a brand new Samsung DLP with a built in 3D engine.
    But the earlier trailer they released was better, the Sobe commercial definitely showed separation between the rows of people. The Chuck ad did look bad.

  • Graham D Clark said

    “anaglyphic 3D Super Bowl commercial necessitating outdated red/blue glasses.”
    No wonder you had such bad experience you were not using the correct glasses.
    But I do agree the 3D didn’t work. Actually red/blue would have been better than the amber/blue used, just not for those without glasses.

  • Cine y TV en 3D: opiniones para todos los gustos | emogeny said

    [...] resultado? Parece ser que no fue lo que se esperaba: gran parte de quienes vieron el partido (hasta un 43% segĂșn una de las encuestas) ni siquiera [...]