<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oscars: Can MAN ON WIRE Lose?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/12/oscars-can-man-on-wire-lose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/12/oscars-can-man-on-wire-lose/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tapley for Tool</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/12/oscars-can-man-on-wire-lose/#comment-120890</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapley for Tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=10268#comment-120890</guid>
		<description>Kris Tapley is a tool of the highest order, and I say that as someone whom knows his action first hand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kris Tapley is a tool of the highest order, and I say that as someone whom knows his action first hand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branden Renfro</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/12/oscars-can-man-on-wire-lose/#comment-120876</link>
		<dc:creator>Branden Renfro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=10268#comment-120876</guid>
		<description>I don't think that Man on Wire is a shoo-in for the Oscar. Like last year, people thought that "No End In Sight" would win. I thought that "Taxi to the Dark Side" was way better.

I think that "Encounters" has a shot, but I think that "Trouble the Water" would win overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that Man on Wire is a shoo-in for the Oscar. Like last year, people thought that &#8220;No End In Sight&#8221; would win. I thought that &#8220;Taxi to the Dark Side&#8221; was way better.</p>
<p>I think that &#8220;Encounters&#8221; has a shot, but I think that &#8220;Trouble the Water&#8221; would win overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Young</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/12/oscars-can-man-on-wire-lose/#comment-120855</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=10268#comment-120855</guid>
		<description>If Spike Lee's 4 LITTLE GIRLS could lose in 1999, anything can happen this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Spike Lee&#8217;s 4 LITTLE GIRLS could lose in 1999, anything can happen this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James McNally</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/12/oscars-can-man-on-wire-lose/#comment-120851</link>
		<dc:creator>James McNally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=10268#comment-120851</guid>
		<description>Oh, I really hope there ISN'T an upset in docs. It's the only category where I've seen any of the films this year. And I think Man on Wire deserves to win handily. I found it mesmerizing, moving, and utterly unique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I really hope there ISN&#8217;T an upset in docs. It&#8217;s the only category where I&#8217;ve seen any of the films this year. And I think Man on Wire deserves to win handily. I found it mesmerizing, moving, and utterly unique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Campbell</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/12/oscars-can-man-on-wire-lose/#comment-120849</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=10268#comment-120849</guid>
		<description>I actually didn't mean that Trouble the Water is bad filmmaking, just that its cause is more sympathy-friendly to Academy voters. I actually like the film a good deal, but I do love Herzog and Marsh's films a lot more, so I think it's a shame they'd lose because they don't really further causes of any kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually didn&#8217;t mean that Trouble the Water is bad filmmaking, just that its cause is more sympathy-friendly to Academy voters. I actually like the film a good deal, but I do love Herzog and Marsh&#8217;s films a lot more, so I think it&#8217;s a shame they&#8217;d lose because they don&#8217;t really further causes of any kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/12/oscars-can-man-on-wire-lose/#comment-120844</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=10268#comment-120844</guid>
		<description>What's with Spout's formal vagaries?  I tend to think this is a good crop of documentaries, and don't really have a dog in this.  

But would Christopher Campbell like to elaborate on his comments on the "filmmaking" in TROUBLE THE WATER?  A great deal of TROUBLE THE WATER is from the subject's point of view...that was kind of the point.  Wobbly or not, it's her camera.  It's this approach that does make it somewhat more "original" than, say, MAN ON WIRE, which, as beautiful as it was, didn't exactly take a new approach (re-enactments, talking heads, zoom-pan stills, etc.) to telling a true story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with Spout&#8217;s formal vagaries?  I tend to think this is a good crop of documentaries, and don&#8217;t really have a dog in this.  </p>
<p>But would Christopher Campbell like to elaborate on his comments on the &#8220;filmmaking&#8221; in TROUBLE THE WATER?  A great deal of TROUBLE THE WATER is from the subject&#8217;s point of view&#8230;that was kind of the point.  Wobbly or not, it&#8217;s her camera.  It&#8217;s this approach that does make it somewhat more &#8220;original&#8221; than, say, MAN ON WIRE, which, as beautiful as it was, didn&#8217;t exactly take a new approach (re-enactments, talking heads, zoom-pan stills, etc.) to telling a true story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Campbell</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/02/12/oscars-can-man-on-wire-lose/#comment-120841</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=10268#comment-120841</guid>
		<description>I'd love to see anything but Trouble the Water win (though The Betrayal and The Garden are two of maybe five Oscar-nominated features I haven't yet seen, so I can't totally be in their favor). But my prediction is for Trouble to win, if only because it's the one doc in the crop I think most voters will have that much-needed sympathy feeling for. Never forget that most people unfortunately value a doc's worth on the cause more than on the filmmaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see anything but Trouble the Water win (though The Betrayal and The Garden are two of maybe five Oscar-nominated features I haven&#8217;t yet seen, so I can&#8217;t totally be in their favor). But my prediction is for Trouble to win, if only because it&#8217;s the one doc in the crop I think most voters will have that much-needed sympathy feeling for. Never forget that most people unfortunately value a doc&#8217;s worth on the cause more than on the filmmaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
