Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post
BREAKING UPWARDS. SXSW Preview.

BREAKING UPWARDS. SXSW Preview.

Karina Longworth
By Karina Longworth posted 8 months ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Daryl Wein’s Breaking Upwards is one of my most personally anticipated films of SXSW 2009. Wein’s follow-up to last year’s SXSW doc premiere Sex Positive, Breaking is a narrative feature starring Wein and his real-life girlfriend Zoe Lister-Jones as themselves alongside a slightly-starrier supporting cast including Olivia Thirlby. Answering The 5 Questions We Ask Everyone, Wein talks about his film and stuff, but more importantly, he makes our second SXSW-related blow job joke of the day.

Tell us about your movie. Who did you work with, why did you make it? Give us the reductive, 25-word or less, “It’s like [pop culture reference a] meets [pop culture reference b]!” pitch, then explain what the quick and dirty sell leaves out.

Breaking Upwards follows a young, real-life New York couple who strategize their own break-up, in a fictional narrative loosely inspired by their open relationship.  The film stars filmmakers and real life couple, Daryl Wein and Zoe Lister-Jones, in addition to a cool cast including Olivia Thirlby (Juno, The Wackness), Julie White (Transformers, Transformers 2), Andrea Martin (My Big Fat Greek Wedding), Peter Friedman (The Savages), and Pablo Schreiber (The Wire, Vicky Cristina Barcelona).  I made it, in part, because it was a story that was quite close to me, but also because I felt there was a lack of complex portrayals of young people’s struggles with monogamy on screen, and I liked the uniqueness of this narrative, and these characters.  I also was drawn to the idea of me and my girlfriend performing our own story in the midst of an otherwise dramatized narrative. It provokes interesting questions about the nature of performance within relationships, as well as the narrative/documentary divide.

It’s like Annie Hall meets Garden State. If Garden State was better. Snap!

Do you have a day job/a non-filmmaking occupation that raises money for your filmmaking efforts? Tell us about it.

I used to be a babysitter, then I quit, filed for unemployment, and was able to sell a documentary I made called, Sex Positive.  Right now, I’m trying to write another movie before the river runs dry.

Have you been to SXSW before? If so, tell us about your funniest story from the experience. If not, what are you looking forward to re: the festival and/or the city of Austin?

Yes,  my feature length documentary, Sex Positive, was in the documentary competition last year.  I had a blast!  The funniest thing that happened while I was there was probably on my way back to the hotel late at night when a stranger handed me a joint out of the window of his car.  Aust-ome.

Let’s get hypothetical: You’re on death row. The night of your execution, you’re allowed to watch any two films of your choice. What would you pick for your last-night-on-Earth double feature?

Maybe Dr. Strangelove to laugh at the insanity of it all, and then Life is Beautiful to try to look on the bright side.

There’s been some criticism that the only way to get into SXSW is by being a part of an “incestuous scene where everybody knows everybody.” So who did *you* have to sleep with to get in? (Metaphorically or literally: are there any SXSW filmmaker(s) past or present that you’re close with personally and/or professionally, and how have those relationships helped or hurt the process of producing your film and getting it seen?)

I think it helped that I had a film in the festival last year.  But I kinda think that’s a half criticism. I think of all the festivals, SXSW is the least tied up in nepotism or celebrity pandering. As compared with a lot of bigger festivals, they still give a voice to truly independent filmmakers.  Also I slept with every staff member.  Lock. Jaw.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • G said

    You know, this might be a good movie. Or it might not. But honestly, reading about it, the filmmaker really has to ask himself if we really need another film about (ahem) white people and their relationship problems. Especially one that is set in Manhattan!

    I don’t know. I think this whole genre has jumped the shark - ages ago. We need to move on.

    If “indie” film is to become relevant again (b/c I think it’s slipping as a cultural touchstone)…filmmakers need to tackle subjects that people care about.

    Most young people who live in Manhattan and dream of an arty, culturally significant existence and who don’t have a full-time job are generally propped up by trust funds or rich parents.

    The world is far more interesting than this.

  • TJ said

    G, I definitely agree with you. Yet another in the now standard pseudo-intellectuals intellectualizing relationships in New York genre. But even as one of those, this flick isn’t helped by how it looks.

    This movie looks awful. Just awful.

  • JB said

    yo mcG, really? i mean really? It’s dangerous to lump every film that has two white twenty somethings into one category. This actually looks different than every other stupid mumblecore movie with white people in it.

    this film doesn’t look like a generic twenty something narrative to me. it looks like it explores issues of monogamy in long term relationships which are pervasive to all generations and all races. it’s not classic boy meets girl. it’s also shot beautifully and doesn’t have any of that faux verite shit that has become all too trendy. so i don’t know what you’re talking about TJ.

    i hate mumblecore. i think it lacks craft in an age where any d-bag can pick up a movie camera and assume their life is audience worthy. but i don’t judge those films before i see them in their entirety. cause that just seems ignorant and petty. you should try to do the same.

    if you’re so concerned with the plight of the disenfranchised get off your computer and do something about it.

  • ummmmm said

    … so is the “JB” person the filmmaker or somebody else involved in the film? or a friend? i mean really? really? seriously, dude - you couldn’t have advertised it more. oh, and only a “d-bag” as you call it would use a word like “mumblecore”. wtf? how much of a hipster retard are you??

    oh, and i agree with TJ, at least based on the trailer for this flick - it looks utterly awful. just awful. oh, and it indeed seems to fall quite readily into the “trying too hard to not be the now-considered-uncool-hip and therefore in essence really trying to be hip and thus in the process end up being douchy and self-aggrandizing” category.