<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter, Bloggers Ganging Up to Destroy Film Criticism. A-gain.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spout.com/2009/05/11/twitter-bloggers-ganging-up-to-destroy-film-criticism-a-gain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/05/11/twitter-bloggers-ganging-up-to-destroy-film-criticism-a-gain/</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Chutry Experiment &#187; Wednesday Links</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/05/11/twitter-bloggers-ganging-up-to-destroy-film-criticism-a-gain/#comment-127149</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chutry Experiment &#187; Wednesday Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=14093#comment-127149</guid>
		<description>[...] film criticism and its blogging, Twittering rival now seems pretty tedious to me (Karina captures that tedium rather well).  Harry Knowles has been reviewing films online for about a decade now (maybe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] film criticism and its blogging, Twittering rival now seems pretty tedious to me (Karina captures that tedium rather well).  Harry Knowles has been reviewing films online for about a decade now (maybe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Everleth</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/05/11/twitter-bloggers-ganging-up-to-destroy-film-criticism-a-gain/#comment-127120</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Everleth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=14093#comment-127120</guid>
		<description>The bloggers J-Pod is talking about are probably making way less than he's giving them credit for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bloggers J-Pod is talking about are probably making way less than he&#8217;s giving them credit for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Kenny</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/05/11/twitter-bloggers-ganging-up-to-destroy-film-criticism-a-gain/#comment-127113</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=14093#comment-127113</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. It is pretty funny how voluminously wrong J-Pod can be in such a relatively short space. Most posts on "Big Hollywood" have to go four times that length (and they do!) to achieve comparative idiocy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. It is pretty funny how voluminously wrong J-Pod can be in such a relatively short space. Most posts on &#8220;Big Hollywood&#8221; have to go four times that length (and they do!) to achieve comparative idiocy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karina Longworth</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/05/11/twitter-bloggers-ganging-up-to-destroy-film-criticism-a-gain/#comment-127098</link>
		<dc:creator>Karina Longworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=14093#comment-127098</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think his ignorance of the economic realities of the internet are potentially more dangerous than his suggestion that essentially anyone can write film criticism. I think if there's anything vaguer than his use of the word "interesting", it's the angry mass' definition of what would better qualify a critic for the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think his ignorance of the economic realities of the internet are potentially more dangerous than his suggestion that essentially anyone can write film criticism. I think if there&#8217;s anything vaguer than his use of the word &#8220;interesting&#8221;, it&#8217;s the angry mass&#8217; definition of what would better qualify a critic for the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Kenny</title>
		<link>http://blog.spout.com/2009/05/11/twitter-bloggers-ganging-up-to-destroy-film-criticism-a-gain/#comment-127095</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spout.com/?p=14093#comment-127095</guid>
		<description>Really? You're more pissed-off at Podhoretz for his ignorance of the fact that you're paid by Spout than you are by his commendation of pig ignorance and cretinously vague praise of the so-called "interesting" sensibility?

I dunno. I think the whole ball of wax is just a vile glob of resentment. The money shot is the contributor's note, by which Podhoretz is able to gloat that HE is still paid to review films for the Standard. That'll show everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? You&#8217;re more pissed-off at Podhoretz for his ignorance of the fact that you&#8217;re paid by Spout than you are by his commendation of pig ignorance and cretinously vague praise of the so-called &#8220;interesting&#8221; sensibility?</p>
<p>I dunno. I think the whole ball of wax is just a vile glob of resentment. The money shot is the contributor&#8217;s note, by which Podhoretz is able to gloat that HE is still paid to review films for the Standard. That&#8217;ll show everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
