Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post
Films on Film at CineVegas

Films on Film at CineVegas

Karina Longworth
By Karina Longworth posted 5 months ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Of the seven features I watched in full whilst at the 2009 CineVegas Film Festival, it seemed that the bravest endeavors, those that took the greatest stabs into the unknown both formally and conceptually, were actually shot on film. If this isn’t notable enough in a space increasingly dominated by digital photography (and, all too often, an aesthetic indifference that fails to push beyond the ease of use of the tools), the fact that films like Impolex, Modus Operandi and Redland are all the first features of men either barely or not quite the age of 30 is astounding. While other young filmmakers exploit ever-changing technology to shrink production budgets and experiment with non-theatrical models of distribution, Alex Ross Perry, Frankie Latina and Asiel Norton have made uncompromising films that defy contemporary technological trends and notions of financial convenience.

I’ve written about Impolex before so I won’t go on about it at length, but it’s worth mentioning in the context of CineVegas’ celluloid trend, for at least two reasons. CineVegas screened a gorgeous 35mm print of the film, blown up from 16mm, which the director had made expressly for this premiere. Perry, who edited Impolex on his home computer, didn’t have to do this — CineVegas could have easily shown the film via Beta tape, as it was seen at Migrating Forms –– but Perry was adamant that he make good on his promise made to cinematographer Sean Williams to show the film on film. And at the Q & A of the first screening, Perry explained that his desired aesthetic, inspired by WWII documentaries, could only be accomplished by shooting in 16mm. “This is just what WWII looks like to me,” he said. The use of “old” tools is so married to the content that the use of film was not negotiable.

Similarly, Redland would not be Redland if Asiel Norton hadn’t shot on film, and although it would be hard to peg such a succinct generic ancestor for this extremely visual and narratively elliptical ode to physical desperation, Norton is even more aggressive than Perry in literally shooting for visual nostalgia. The story of a dirt-poor family of five living in a secluded mountain shack during the (first?) great depression, the first image of Redland is of teenage daughter Mary-Ann (young Maggie Rizer look-a-like Lucy Adden) alone in a field, punching herself in the gut to induce an abortion. It’s an almost unbearably intense scene, one which virtually wordlessly sets the terms of Redland’s core investigation into the rash physicality of this family’s despair. In a narrative that’s constantly folding in on itself and collapsing fantasy into reality, Norton goes on to intertwine Mary-Ann’s secret, lustful, agonized longing for the absent Charlie (Toben Seymour) with her family’s increasingly dire spiral into starvation. In taking Charlie along on a hunting trek, Mary-Ann’s father forces both crises of hunger to a tipping point of near-mythical proportions.
Shot seemingly entirely with natural and candle light (sometimes, not enough of either to illuminate the actors — a couple scenes play out in a barely legible muddle of dark grain), almost every image in Redland has apparently been processed in some way to look old. Some images are increasingly blurred out from the focal point, as if shot with a pinhole camera; others are psychedelic in their use of color and long dissolves. Norton’s experimentation can be extremely challenging to a viewer looking for narrative clarity, but it mostly works as a formal expression of tone and feeling. Personally, I can roll with Redland’s visual abstraction; I have less tolerance for its intermittent, hokey hippie-poetic narration. That first scene is stunning for what it tells us without words, but too much of the spoken language in Redland adds little to the experience, other than confirmation that the filmmaker likes Terrence Malick. Somewhere between the swooning backwoods romance and the contemplation of pagan spirituality in nature, we might have figured that out regardless.


Modus Operandi
is an entire film about the kinds of films that its maker likes, but Frankie Latina pulls it off with a freshness and charm that’s unquestionably invigorating. A Pulp Fiction-like ode to spy and hitman schlock, Operandi was shot with mod panache entirely on Super8 (as Latina would put it, incorrectly, at the film’s Q & A, “the same film stock they shot the Kennedy assassination on”) over four years in Milwaukee, with expanded cameos from American Movie’s Mark Borchardt and Robert Rodriguez regular Danny Trejo, and the majority of the rest of the cast culled from Craig’s List. The result is a grand feat of DIY exploitation that would seem to render the long-rumored, apparently soon-to-shoot Rodriguez/Trejo collaboration Machete virtually unnecessary.

Modus Operandi’s plot is both unnecessarily complicated and virtually irrelevant. Randy Russell, from American Job, plays Stanley Cashay, an undercover operative dragged out of drunken retirement by the CIA to rescue two missing suitcases, both of which contain videotaped smut that could embarrass a smarmy candidate for president. Cashay essentially outsources the job, and over the course of the film the suitcases change hands innumerable times, passing through the opulent, bikini-girl-clogged lairs populated by spies and crooks with names like Black Licorice and Marcello Maserati.

As the action moves back and forth from Milwaukee to Siberia (probably also shot in Milwaukee) to Japan (according to the credits, actually shot in Japan), the narrative itself becomes completely incoherent. Still, it looks great, and for the full 70 minute running time, the novelty sustains, hitting its peak with the appearance of a quipping Danny Trejo (“Adios, gringo,” he cracks after installing a lit stick of dynamite in the vacancy left by a bad guy’s gouged eyeball). Modus Operandi is what Grindhouse should have been — maybe, would have been — if freed from ego and studio budget bloat. It may not be the best film at CineVegas, but it’s got to be one of the great underground discoveries of the year.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • Local weather forecast said

    There was an old black and white art film, (or at least, I believe it’s art) where there was a woman sitting in a chair with a man standing behind her. The man reaches down and pulls open her eye, and slices across it with a razor blade.

  • Brian said

    Any word on possible distribution for any of these films? This is the first I’m hearing about any of them, and they all sound delicious.

  • Erik McClanahan said

    Karina -

    you’ve piqued my interest with all 3 of these films. So good to see that even DIYers are shooting on film if they can afford it and it’s right for the story they want to tell. Modus Operandi sounds like an especially good time, though I’ll probably have to wait for a quiet DVD release for all 3, huh? Keep up the great work, it doesn’t go unnoticed (or unnappreciated) in my neck of the woods.

  • michael said

    The black and white ‘art film’ you’re referring to is called ‘Un chien Andalou’. It was the first film directed by surrealist Louis Bunuel who cowrote the script with Salvador Dali.

  • Alejandro Adams said

    Shooting on film is a radical gesture but also a eulogistic one. Who these days thinks digital filmmaking is an alternative rather than the norm?

    The relative youth of these filmmakers is a foregone conclusion, but if the matter is worth stating, then it’s worth exploring.

    Those who “experiment with non-theatrical models of distribution” seem more concerned with distribution than with making films. Each stage of the process has its hand-wringing obsessives–some think it’s about the image resolution of the camera, some think it’s about making the final product available for free on the Internet. Rarely in this nexus of priorities do we sense that anyone is actually concerned with making a film as a matter of executing an intractable personal vision of the sort you celebrate in this review(s).

    Each image-gathering tool (8, 16, 35, SD, HD) offers its own peculiar insufficiencies. But, then, a sufficient tool expresses only its sufficiency. Never should technology be mistaken for the friend or ally of the artist. One must fear it or despise it. Much great cinema has resulted from the maker’s anxiety over the inadequacy of his tools to express his vision.

    Digital technology has not changed how films are made; it has changed what films are. The digital camera is not a film-making tool but a film-destroying tool–a wrecking ball. Anyone using digital technology to make a film is a passive vessel for the total destruction of the cinema.

    A few of us knowingly come as destroyers.

  • Deirdre Saoirse Moen said

    Un Chien Andalou is indeed the film; it’s a riff on a scene out of a Garcia Lorca play and is the basis for the fallout between Dali and Garcia Lorca. Some of the back story is explained in the film Little Ashes (about Garcia Lorca, Dali, and Bunuel), along with a translated bit of the play it refers to.