Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

RSS Feeds:All posts by this author|All comments for this post

AN EDUCATION Review

Karina Longworth
By Karina Longworth posted 2 months ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Lone Scherfig’s An Education is an extremely classy film –– classy as in modish, classy as in overtly concerned with class, and both ultimately at the expense of digging as deep as it could into the gut ugliness of first heartbreak. It’s about Jenny (Carey Mulligan), an Oxford-bound beauty in 1960s suburban London, the pet of an old maid-ish English teacher (Olivia Williams) and a worthy sparring opponent for her protective dad (a sharply funny Albert Molina), who takes a vacation from smart-girl responsibility in order to lose herself in the charms of the much older David (Peter Sarsgaard). David picks her up one rainy day and proceeds to insinuate himself into the schoolgirl’s boring, middle-class life, charming her unsophisticated parents into allowing him to take their daughter on weekend trips, tempting her with the lifestyle of the full-time consort, and eventually endangering her virtue, her standing at her uptight all-girls prep school, and her future.

Oh, young love! When An Education works, it’s because it’s capable of recreating the insane fog of love, particularly first love, which always feels like last love. To the outside eye, Jenny is a foolish girl making choices with her heart and libido at the expense of her head, but in the film’s most interesting angle, Scherfig and Hornby approach Jenny’s escape to romance as a political decision. In a post-WWII world, an antebellum age between The Blitz and The Beatles, where the specter of mass destruction is very real just outside Jenny’s bedroom community and her Jewish boyfriend is still an outsider, she feels she’s making an informed decision to live life to the fullest while that option is still available to her. The proto-feminist option — to go as far as possible academically at the expense of expanding her horizons emotionally, with little potential reward in sight –– is, compared to the life David promises of sports cars and cocktails and other shadily acquired luxuries, a death sentence. Watching An Education, you could only wonder why such a smart, rational, good girl would so easily abandon middle class morality and lose her head so many points along the way, if you’ve either never fallen so deeply under the spell of another, or you have and have opted to forget that momentary loss of control.

Ultimately An Education seems to take the latter option. After revealing the truth about David and Jenny’s relationship, Education opts for a kind of willful forgetting about the ways in which youthful romantic obsession leaves its mark on relationships moving forward. The film resolves itself so easily that the last couple of scenes play as if there were a serious scene missing before the camera-drifting-off-into-the-clouds sign-off. Never, up to this point, in charge of telling her own story, Jenny suddenly reveals her inner monologue via voice-over in the film’s tacked-on coda. Her “and life goes on” reflections are very sensible, very classy, and very weirdly cheery, as if this girl has casually pushed aside the “education” she received at the hands of her older boyfriend, as if it had never happened. An Education works as a fever dream of first love, but the wake-up is unsatisfying and incomplete.

Add your comments

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • Winston Smith said

    Uh so I’m guessing the Brittish didn’t have laws against pedophilia back then? And the neighborhood , including the supposedly uptight parents (?!) and the evil man’s own wife did nothing to stop this sexual predator? And this actually happened.?! Disgraceful. This man should be getting anally gang raped along with Polanski in prison right now.

    Teenage girls, take this movie as a warning: this is where a lack of appreciation for bourgeois morality gets you.

  • Henry Ashdown said

    What is Winston Smith talking about….she was 16 not 14!!

  • arthur baker said

    What an incredibly blunt and insensitve responce winston smith. Had you watched the film you would realise that the man is not a sexual predetor, but a man who falls in love with a girl, and goes in over his head, he is not a villan. The girls parents only want her to be happy, and think that marrying a rich man will give her social and financial security, and so make her happy. There is no need to bring roman polanski into this, it is not a fair comparison, although he - like “david” - is to be pittied as a victim, and not hated.

  • Lawrence Cohen, MD said

    A succinct, sensitive review that neglects the sinister secondary theme of anti-semitism protrayed by the script writers, and seemingly unnecessary for and unrelated to the “school girl coming of age” narrative of the film. What purpose does the portrayal of David, as a sexually immature, philandering, conniving art thief/slum landlord JEW, have in this film? Couldn’t he have portrayed all these despicable qualities without being Jewish? This Jewish reference serves nothing except to bait the British lust for anti semitism, and serves to only detract from the innocent and complex messages for young women to stay in school and to keep their legs together…at least until they reach their own particular “Oxford”!

  • William Rogers said

    As a non-Jew, I left the movie wondering if the director was an anti-semite. The Jewish character embodied all the negative Jewish stereotypes. He manipulated financial transactions, he was a cheat, and a thief. He even had beady eyes. The innovation of the movie was that the Jew was also a sexual predator.