Who says the movies are recession-proof? A lot of people, actually, yet for every record-breaking opening weekend while the economy is in the shitter, a small film studio, distributor or film festival is likely still hurting financially. Maybe even going bankrupt.
Today movie lovers are saddened by the financial woes experienced by two very different film-based institutions. CineVegas, a favorite film festival of Spout’s Karina Longworth, announced it will be taking a year off due to the current economy. Meanwhile, MGM is also in a desperate situation, though not necessarily due to the recession, and that could mean future Hobbit and James Bond films are also at least temporarily in jeopardy.
I’m not as concerned for those film franchises as I am for Leo the Lion, beloved MGM mascot and monumental film icon. I hope to never have to see the likely punny headlines referencing a certain Tokens song if the lion is forever put to sleep. As for CineVegas, I’ve never even been to the Sin City event, so I can’t speak firsthand to what a loss this is for the 2010 film fest circuit. Still, it made me very sad to read the news of its troubles today.
Check out what the film blogs have to say about each of these depressing stories after the jump:
…Read more
As Chris briefly noted earlier this morning, MGM has confirmed last week’s CNET rumors and announced that they’re slowly rolling some of their feature film library on to YouTube. But the New York Times story about this, by Brad Stone and the always-skeptical Brooks Barnes, warns us not to get too excited — because MGM certainly isn’t.
…Read more
As political polemic and as entertainment, Robert Redford’s Lions for Lambs is mostly unsuccessful, but as a statement of purpose on behalf of its co-star and executive producer, Tom Cruise, it’s mildly fascinating. Through sheer force of star power, Cruise manages to temporarily hijack this lumpy lecture, and turn it into a battle cry against the corporate media that both built and destroyed him.
You probably don’t need to be reminded that Cruise has had a rough couple of years, culminating in the announcement in November 2006 that he and long-time producing partner Paula Wagner had signed a deal to resurrect MGM’s dormant United Artists. Some saw this as a savvy move for both Cruise and MGM: disappointing box office on Mission Impossible: 3 aside, there’s still no one on the planet with Cruise’s international name-and-face recognition, and as he proved with War of the Worlds, which made $65 million in its first weekend just a scant month after the couch jumping incident, the guy can open the right project regardless of what’s going on in his personal life. But skeptics (myself included) wondered if MGM was just throwing Cruise a bone—if they weren’t doing anything with UA anyway, was handing the brand over really a sure sign of confidence?
The guy had—has–something to prove. With his career at the crossroads, the choice of Lions For Lambs as the vehicle to drive him over the hump is not an immediately logical one. It’s worth noting that Cruise didn’t go looking for politically relevant story to tell—Redford signed on to direct the script, and then called Cruise, looking to cast him. And I may get permanently disinvited from Sundance for saying this, but I’m not sure if Redford fully knew what he was getting into.
…Read more