I don’t watch television so I didn’t witness Sony’s “media roadblock” presentation of 2012 footage last night, but fortunately — like all TV-related things I want to see — the footage is available online. Actually, the online clip is longer: five whole minutes of John Cusack outrunning the collapse of California with a limousine. Yes, all of California. From what it looks like, Cusack and his estranged family are the only ones to survive. I kinda feel like I even died in the disaster along with the millions of West Coasters. That’s how insanely destructive this footage is.
Honestly, this sequence may be the most ridiculous and awesome footage from any film I’ve ever seen, and I have to thank Erik Davis of Cinematical for bringing it to my attention this morning with a Tweet claiming “California is going down” may be the movie quote of the year — though I think “Chaos reigns” already has that distinction. Sure, this footage resembles a lot of nightmares I’ve had, and after all the Pacific earthquakes this past week I’m even more worried that the actual Big One is approaching (and I don’t even live out there), but it’s just so damn ludicrous that I’ve already watched it a few times back to back. And I can’t wait to see it again in the theater. Is anyone not with me?
Check out other film blogger’s thoughts on the footage after the jump:
…Read more
While most of the film blogosphere is wondering why Sony hasn’t yet greenlit a District 9 sequel, our old friends at the Oscar blogs are addressing a potential awards campaign for the sci-fi hit. According to Peter Bart at Variety, an Academy screening of the film over the weekend was very well received (best applause in years? come on), and the news has sparked buzz of a possible Best Picture nod. After all, there are ten available slots this year.
Honestly, I enjoyed the movie very much, but if it’s being considered Oscar-worthy, I’ll be the first to begin the backlash (against the awards push; Armond White already took care of the general backlash). District 9 shouldn’t be nominated for Best Picture any more than Star Trek should. It shouldn’t even be nominated any more than Transformers 2 should. Regardless of how much better it may be.
And I don’t necessarily have anything against a sci-fi movie being up for the award. If Cameron’s Avatar is groundbreaking and brilliant, give it a nomination. I just want to make it clear that District 9 is very good, but it is not that good. And just saying that it deserves an Oscar campaign adds to the continued depreciation of the Academy Awards.
Read what other film bloggers are saying about the District 9 Oscar buzz after the jump:
…Read more

***Apparently resigned to the idea that Evan Almighty can never recoup its costs and is basically the biggest tax write-off ever, Universal has scrapped plans to release the picture in Japan. The studio declined to state a specific reason, but Variety speculates that Steve Carell’s lack of international star power might be part of the problem. Oh, and the fact that Americans didn’t want to see it either.
***Consumer home video spending is down almost five percent, and studios are blaming themselves for releasing so much crap during the first half of the year.
***Sony, which bought online video portal Grouper last year, has changed the site’s name to Crackle as part of an effort to re-brand the property as a vehicle for Sony-produced content, as well as a launching pad for new video stars. Contests in place at launch tempt user participation by offering pitch meetings with Sony execs as a grand prize–as if kids who are getting millions of page views on YouTube would give it all up for a conference call.

Remember last week, when I wondered what would happen with Donnie Darko director Richard Kelly’s Southland Tales with the director officially moving on to his next project? Shortly after writing that post, I got on an airplane, and Kelly updated his MySpace blog:
As for Southland Tales… we are about halfway through completing all of the new visual effects. We have to deliver everything by the end of summer. I have to tell everyone that the amount of visual effects work being added to the film is SIGNIFICANT… and I am so grateful for the work being done by Thomas Tannenberger and his team at Gradient VFX in Venice Beach.
And I can confirm that a company has been hired by Sony to begin work on a trailer. The release date will be announced very soon.
This post would seem to be carefully designed to telegraph two messages:
1) Those are his caps on SIGNIFICANT. At ComicCon last summer, Kelly distanced himself from the Cannes cut of Southland, insisting that the version shown to critics the previous May lacked the special effects needed to flesh out the story. (Post-Cannes 2006, there were rumors that the stars of Southland were looking for distance, too–rumors which were given credence by the fact that not a single boldfaced name joined Kelly on stage in San Diego.) He’s clearly saying, “This movie looks totally different from the movie that got those crappy reviews.”
2) Based on the phrasing of the final sentence, it;s sounds like Sony isn’t planning on setting a release date until they have a trailer/a better idea of how/when/to whom they can market the film. Considering the time and money they’ve already invested, that would make sense.
The verdict? This news is better than no news, but Kelly fans can hardly breathe easy.
More on Spout:
Southland Tales: What’s The Deal?
Southland Tales
Donnie Darko
For some time high profile business leaders, celebrities and politicians have lived under the threat of the “blogosphere.” The mental scenario follows the Howard Dean story. In one moment of carelessness, something will slip from the mouth, be appropriated by a snarky music-pirating college kid and transformed into a viral bit of content infiltrating millions of inboxes and shattering a life’s work. The Internet has done for public humiliation what the microwave did for dinner.
Now, Sony Pictures is beating the geek squad to the punch. They’re reediting hundreds of television shows from their library (TJ Hooker, Diff’rent Strokes, Starsky and Hutch, Silver Spoons, What’s Happening, etc) into three and a half minute episodes with–and take note– full story arcs. Meaning, they’re admitting what we all knew growing up. Take out the commercials and mindless subplots (Heather Locklear trying to arrest a fat, sarcastic, 12 year old shoplifter) and what you have is three to four minutes of William Shatner on the hood of a burglar’s getaway car.
They say they’re cutting these campy mini-shows together for a generation with a “shorter attention span.” As if the doldrums in these episodes are the responsibility of an ADD generation. However, deep down they’re simply coming clean with what we all knew growing up. If an hour-long police drama can be cut into three and a half minutes, it’s not attention spans that have gotten shorter. It’s changing the channel that has gotten a lot easier.
I just did a post on SpoutBlog’s web and technology side about the cable channel Current TV. A mere year ago the idea of user-generated content as a source of entertainment was so new it was puzzling people; now, in a world with YouTube, the concept is old hat.
So what do you all think about this other aspect of Current TV: letting viewers create advertisements? Here’s what the San Francisco Chronicle article says:
Link: Why Hollywood Movies Prefer to Premiere in New York.
“But the real reason is that New York’s the home base for the burgeoning, always-hungry celeb-photo press, guaranteeing coverage…The joke is that I don’t think you have to show the movie. If you say “red carpet”, they’ll come, they’ll take the pictures, they’ll ask the same questions, and they’ll go home”
This reminds me of a great article I read in The Times a couple of weeks ago about the recent decline in the box office. In the article, Mr. Lynton of Sony said he would be focused on making, “only movies we hope will be really good.” Mr. Shmuger, of Universal, said the he intends to reassert “time and passion” in movie production. He goes on to say that some of his own summer movies should have never been made.
It is evident to me that Hollywood is willing to blow off their audience if it does not effect their bottom-line. But now, audiences are no longer taking Hollywood’s crap and are forcing them to actually think about making quality films. They are no longer fulfilled by the empty experiences of the multiplex. As audiences are turning away from the multiplex, what will we do now for our film watching experience?
Dave