Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Coverage of what is truly interesting in the film world

TOP STORY:

10 Best Online Marketing Gimmicks

10 Best Online Marketing Gimmicks

Christopher Campbell
By Christopher Campbell posted 7 months ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Through one of the smartest film promotions I’ve seen in awhile, Disney has already sold 500,000 advance tickets to its little nature doc-for-kids, Earth, by promising to plant a tree for each audience member who pays to see the film during its first week (starting tomorrow and ending Tuesday, April 28). Never mind that all those people could just plant a tree themselves, and that families may ultimately be disappointed to find the movie is less focused than the ads would have them believe (the “three animal families” narrative is often abandoned for a broader look at the planet’s ecosystems) –– the fact that Disney managed to come up with such a successful marketing gimmick, and incentive, that has no necessary web-related elements is extremely commendable in these mostly viral-campaign-obsessed times.

Of course, there’s nothing at all wrong with online movie marketing, and it’s worth pointing to another new film opening this week, Obsessed, which has a fun little gimmick utilizing personalizing technology we’ve seen in plenty of prior viral promotional tools. It may not help save the planet, but we actually had more fun making this video, in which we made Ali Larter seem to be obsessed with SpoutBlog editor Karina Longworth, than we did watching Disney’s Earth. Then again, we at least saw the documentary, primarily because of its promotion, yet we probably won’t be seeing the very banal-looking Obsessed.

Ignoring whether or not they were successful, we picked ten other favorite viral gimmicks, many of which were more enjoyable than the movies they promoted:
…Read more

10 Movies That Came Out Too Late

Christopher Campbell
By Christopher Campbell posted 1 year ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Earlier this year, I thought that it was way too late for a Sex and the City movie. But then it made a ton of cash, so I guess I was wrong. Still, I’m going to continue similarly thinking it’s too late for another X-Files movie. And even if I’m proven wrong and the masses get out to theaters this weekend in search of the truth, I’ll keep on believing that X-Files: I Want to Believe is way past its time.

To celebrate Mulder and Scully’s tardiness, here are 10 other movies that came out too late:

  1. The Godfather Part III (Released in: 1990; Should have been released in: 1976) - Never mind the fact that had this third installment been made years earlier, Sofia Coppola wouldn’t have been cast and therefore wouldn’t have given her terribly infamous performance. The more important matter is that sequels arriving more than a decade after the previous installment are almost always doomed. The longer the wait, the higher the expectations, and the greater the disappointment. Of course, not everyone agrees that it was also too late for Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, Live Free or Die Hard, Rambo, Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace, etc.
    …Read more

Trade Roughage 12/18/07

Karina Longworth
By Karina Longworth posted 1 year ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • The WGA has refused to grant waivers to allow guild members to script the Golden Globe and Academy Awards during the strike. Unless the strike miraculously ends by the end of January–or the producers of the shows manage to negotiate with the WGA as independent contractors–this will effectively make any star who attends either award show a picket-line crossing rat. The guild has also denied the Academy the right to use clips involving the work of their writers during the telecast.
  • United Artists has pushed the release of Valkyrie, the controversial WWII drama directed by Bryan Singer and starring Tom Cruise, from July 4th weekend to October 2008. Such a move from a normal studio might indicate plans to push the film as an awards contender rather than as a summer blockbuster; in this case, it appears that Singer just hasn’t finished shooting.
  • Fox is “Simpsonizing” Manhattan today, as part of a marketing blitz to promote the DVD release of The Simpsons Movie. There will be a Simpsons on Ice show at Bryant Park today, the Empire State Building will be illuminated in yellow tonight, and “giant inflatable Homers” will be sprinkled through out the city.
  • Nicole Holofcener will once again team with Catherine Keener for a still-untitled dramedy about “life, death and real estate” in New York City.

Scott’s Simpsons Bias

Karina Longworth
By Karina Longworth posted 2 years ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

picture-59.png

After 18 years, is there anything new to say about The Simpsons that hasn’t already been said? Possibly, but if so, A.O. Scott isn’t saying it. At the Vulture blog, Dan Kois and/or Lane Brown (no byline on the post) notes that the film critic has basically spent his entire tenure at the New York Times dropping obsequious references to The Simpsons in places where they probably didn’t belong. To herald the arrival of Scott’s review of The Simpsons Movie, in which the critic leads off by announcing his contention that “the entire history of American popular culture — maybe even of Western civilization — amounts to little more than a long prelude to The Simpsons,” The Vultures round up eight examples of this, which stand in addition to Scott’s 2001 Simpsons hagiography, Homer’s Odyssey.

All of this begs the question: when a critic has shown an inordinate bias for or against a director/star/brand/topic/theme, should they then be recused from reviewing its associated products? Is it possible for even a professional critic to apply their usual acumen to a cultural product that they’ve already professed to being deeply in love (or hate) with? I don’t know. My long-burning crush on Clive Owen didn’t keep me from thinking Sin City was another soulless bit of hack-work from Robert Rodriguez. Whose films I uniformly can’t stand. So, uh, yeah, maybe.

Lohan, The Simpsons and Southland: Trade Roughage 07/25/07

Karina Longworth
By Karina Longworth posted 2 years ago
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

lindsayredback.jpg

  • Brian Lowry has a favorable review of The Simpsons Movie: “Put simply, if somebody had to make a Simpsons movie, this is pretty much what it should be — clever, irreverent, satirical and outfitted with a larger-than-22-minutes plot, capable (just barely) of sustaining a narrative roughly four times the length of a standard episode.”
  • Variety has a loooong consideration of Lindsay Lohan’s future career prospects, as well as an update on the status of Poor Things, the film the rehab rat was scheduled to begin shooting next month alongside Shirley MacLaine. Can Linds make a Robert Downey Jr.-like comeback? The story quotes sales agent Andrew Herwitz, who speculates that Lohan might be able to find redemption in indie film: “She wanted to break free of kid roles, anyway. A lot of indie producers are probably going to be able to cast her in interesting parts because she will actually be reading their scripts. Not a lot of other scripts may be sent to her for a while.”
  • The Hollywood Reporter has a ho-hum quote from Richard Kelly regarding the Southland Tales release date saga, as well as the news that he’ll be making an appearance at Comic-Con to discuss the film.